What's a bit mad is that drew initially said that those not from the area shouldn't be lecturing those that are and now it turns out you are from the area you're being berated for pointing that out too.
That's not what I said at all.
What's a bit mad is that drew initially said that those not from the area shouldn't be lecturing those that are and now it turns out you are from the area you're being berated for pointing that out too.
Utterly amazing that you are lecturing minnie about not understanding what happens on her own doorstep.
You clearly know so much better than anyone who has to deal with these particular kids on a day to day basis.
Perhaps i interpreted it incorrectly then. As you were.
I think maybe so, the context of that comment was co-op trying to lecture minnie about an incident that she saw happen right outside her home, and that he didn't. Completely daft imo. But hey ho, just my opinion innit.
I got no beef with anyone on this thread, but I've clearly upset some and unintentionally derailed the thread somewhat by using the word liberal. I won't bother again, but I still stand by everything I've said.
Btw eric I think that most of what you've posted is absolutely spot on, and also put far more eloquently than I could ever manage.
The problem with this thread is that people have quite different reactions to this sort of thing. Some people have an overriding emotional response that lasts for quite a while, some people quickly get over the initial emotional response and try to react purely logically, and some of us have built up a huge store of anger over similar incidents over many years and react with a conditioned reflex that may be based on either emotion or logical analysis. It's very easy to see ones own reaction as being the only sensible one, and every alternative a sign of something being badly wrong. In fact all the reactions are reasonable. However, whilct I accept that an instinctive emotional revulsion is something that has to be taken into account, I object to the idea that because that's how some people react that the rest of us shouldn't get on with a logical analysis of how to improve things.
Attacking everyone who doesn't respond with the correct emotional over reaction doesn't get us anywhere.
Can we just stick with the attempted MURDER as that is what this thread is about. Keep your childish banter to yourself
One of the teenage suspects in the shooting of five-year-old Thusha Kamaleswaran has been stabbed.
The 17-year-old is in a "serious but stable" condition under police guard in hospital, sources confirmed.
He was admitted to hospital with stab wounds on Saturday - a day before his arrest on suspicion of the attempted murder of Thusha and 35-year-old Roshan Selvakumar.
http://www.streathamguardian.co.uk/...dium=Twitter&ref=rss&utm_source=SNS.analytics
One of the suspects has been stabbed:
17 year old suspect of the shooting has been stabbed, and is currently in Kings.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20110405/tuk-teenage-shooting-suspect-stabbed-6323e80.html
I am a little confused about what I have read.
Did one of the perpetrators hand himself in to the police?
Who handed themselves in and who was arrested?
Sorry just read conflicting things and got confused.
Can we just stick with the attempted MURDER as that is what this thread is about. Keep your childish banter to yourself
Good point. As im one of those who can be characterised as "liberal handwringer" I would add that I can have all the responses to an incident like this together. That is why i have some sympathy for Giles.
If I had been present my reaction would have not been rational. The instance where i did witness this kind of violence left an indelible mark on me. However it was not until Raverdrew wound me up that i remembered it. I had pushed it out of my conscious memory.
Btw eric I think that most of what you've posted is absolutely spot on, and also put far more eloquently than I could ever manage.
I can only apologise if I've inadvertently brought back any distress with those words Gramsci, the situation you mention sounds horrible I honestly didn't realise that what I said would cause anyone such problems.
Nathaniel Grant, 20, of Camberwell New Road, Camberwell, Kazeem Kolawoli, 18, of Black Prince Road, Lambeth, and Anthony McCalla, 19, of Oakdale Road, Streatham, were charged with attempted murder.
Bumped because the three accused were convicted today, and will be sentenced (for GBH on the girl and the other bystander, for possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life and for attempted murder on the bloke they were trying to shoot) on the 19th of April. One would hope it will be for a very long time indeed, given how utterly needless this was and how incredibly sad that CCTV footage is.
Thusha (the girl they shot) only gets to be released from hospital next week.
What else will they be charged with? Surely Intent to Endanger Life and Attempted Murder aren't the crimes that relate to the poor girl? Is there not another charge for what they did to her?
GBH (and probably in its section 20 form) is the most serious charge that they could have been charged with in relation the injuries they caused to her - as it appears they didnt intend to shoot her or the other bloke - but possession of a firearm w/i to endanger life and attempted murder are both offences that you can (and one would hope should, in this case) get life for. They did get convicted on all counts though, it seems.
I think the maximum for GBH is life,and since they were tooled up I'm guessing it's GBH with intent.It's also possible they'll get hefty and possibly consecutive sentences for the other stuff.I can see them getting 30year tariffs.Mind you IANAL.
One of them had previously been acquitted of the murder of a boy on my street, almost identical circumstances, shooting into a shop and hitting an innocent bystander.They did get convicted on all counts though, it seems.