Yes paradoxicaly the establishment has a vested interest in maintaining its own much milder form of facisism against the BNP
I say paradoxicaly because it also creates the conditions in which facisin can emerge which is why we must seek to reform it whilst also on occasions working with it. Remember it was the industrial might of our establishment that defeated nazisism a threat to its own vested interests.
Then you're a lib-dem mug.
Then you're a lib-dem mug.
Explain im not sure what you are asking nowAlong what lines?
I'm asking you to explain what good ideas lib-dems might have about fighting fascsim today that aren't pro-status quo.
Actually there is common ground to be found amongst all humans if you try and look hard enougth, even if that common ground is simply fear.
It's possible I belive even to work together with capitalists, and especially on pan global issues such as climate change and opposing fascism.
On the political compass there are many libertarian capitalists who strongly oppose fascism, they just have a different way of trying to fight it.
Sectarian I am liberal yes.
Not an anarchist then.
An anarcho-liberal who thinks there is a need for grass roots democratic organisations to oppose state and corporate monopolies. Hence why Im an active trade unionist as I think free markets are a good thing so long as they are actively partially opposed to mitigate against thier worse aspects in a balanced conflict of interest. This thread is getting a bit moon focused
freemarkets that are actively partially opposed to mitigate against their worse aspects? are you familiar with the term 'oxymoron'?An anarcho-liberal who thinks there is a need for grass roots democratic organisations to oppose state and corporate monopolies. Hence why Im an active trade unionist as I think free markets are a good thing so long as they are actively partially opposed to mitigate against thier worse aspects in a balanced conflict of interest. This thread is getting a bit moon focused
unity on whose platform? eh? fuck your 'unitity'!The point is we cant be dogmatic in fighting facisism we need a new approach and we should not exclude people who might be of use. Im advocating unitity thats all
people who had parents and (other) family killed in the holocaust do not necessarily have top politics, or politics capable of doing more than sounding off against the bnp. their membership of the establishment gives them a rather vested interest in the status quo ante, and i for one have little interest working with people who simply want their interests shored up and have no concern for the creation of a better world.Im not pro status-quo just willing to work with the establishment some of who had parents and family killed in the holocaust and care passionatly about stopping the BNP
not an anarchist then. A liberal.
you don't need an 'official' definition of anarchism to know it is a different creature from liberalism.If you say so, its a semantic point unless there is an official definition of anarchism which would seem paradoxical to me. I feel like you are trying to pigeon hole my politics when we probably agree on a lot and could be working in a more constructive discourse.
If you say so, its a semantic point unless there is an official definition of anarchism which would seem paradoxical to me. I feel like you are trying to pigeon hole my politics when we probably agree on a lot and could be working in a more constructive discourse.
Defend this sytenms against the fascists! Defend Oxford, defend the queen, defend partliament, defend democracy, defend capitalism!