Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

Anti-Fascist Resource.

TremulousTetra

prismatic universe
I wanted to create a thread, that wasn't a debate about how people oppose the fascists, but was a resource for people to use how they will. I thought it could be a thread where people could add links to pictures, videos, speeches, documentaries, journals that delineate something about the neo fascist nature of the fascist parties of Britain. For example;
Here is a link to the constitution of the British National Party.

vhttp://bnp .org.uk/resources/constitution-9th-edition/


This has some beautiful gems like;


The leader can;
Change sections of the constitution without consultation with the members
Block any proposals from anyone asking for a change to the constitution
Dismiss any BNP member for anything he sees fit
Proscribe members from having any contact with any individual or organisation he chooses
The BNP is currently NOT a democratic party. So Y, would you trusted to be democratic in government.
From the BNP constitution
The British National Party stands for the preservation of the national and ethnic character of the British people and is wholly opposed to any form of racial integration between British and non-European peoples. It is therefore committed to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration and to restoring, by legal changes, negotiation and consent, the overwhelmingly white makeup of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948.
 
i don't mean to piss on your parade, but this sort of resource seems to exist already at bnp org uk - reading through some of the blogs linked to from there complements this voluminous website

any reasonable person will rapidly find enough there to give them enough ammunition on the subject
 
i don't mean to piss on your parade, but this sort of resource seems to exist already at bnp org uk - reading through some of the blogs linked to from there complements this voluminous website

any reasonable person will rapidly find enough there to give them enough ammunition on the subject

A lot of reasonable people seem to be voting for them though regardless of whether they're deemed a fascist party...
 
Thanks, ResistanceMP3. Going by the bit of the constitution you tell us about, the BNP seems not to be internally democratic.

The BNP is currently NOT a democratic party. So Y, would you trusted to be democratic in government.

Can you think of any other fringe sects that lack democracy?

Perhaps I'm taking an insufficiently dialectical view of these things, but if an undemocratic group should not be trusted in government, we should not trust your little Church of Latter Day Bolsheviks anywhere near power, should we?

Still, never mind. I really can't see any risk of Griffinites or Cliffites forming a government.
 
i don't mean to piss on your parade, but this sort of resource seems to exist already at bnp org uk - reading through some of the blogs linked to from there complements this voluminous website

any reasonable person will rapidly find enough there to give them enough ammunition on the subject

Well thats the problem, I couldn't find what your talking about.
 
Copied from elswhere.
This is the sort of story I want to hear from a former NF member, turned BNP leader/hardcore (not that I expect them to end up campaigning for minority rights necessarily) but no-one seems to answer the question; when and how NG and pals had the road to Damascus moment that turned them from neo-Nazi thugs into democracy loving nationalists.

 
An alternative source for the BNP for their manifesto

1 Item from that;
Is The BNP really an anti-immigration party?

"The horrifying future that awaits Britain as a result of the follies of Third World immigration can only be averted if we adopt two very firm policies: 1) Future immigration of non-whites must be stopped; 2) Non-whites already here must be repatriated or otherwise resettled overseas and Britain made once again a white country". - BNP General Election Manifesto 1997

After its poor results in the 1997 General Election, The BNP has changed its policies of forced repatriation to "voluntary repatriation". Is it possible that this has been changed in order to make the BNP more appealing to the electorate, but the policy, combined with a few others, still amount to the same thing?

"A BNP government would accept no further immigration from any of the parts of the world which present the prospect of an almost limitless flow of immigration: Africa, Asia, China, Eastern and South Eastern Europe, the Middle East and South America would all be placed on an immediate ‘stop' list." - BNP General Election Manifesto 2005

This undermines the idea that the BNP is an anti-immigration party and indicates that The BNP would actually still allow most immigrants into the country so long as they are white, because in reality the majority of immigrants in the UK originate from the Republic of Ireland, yet Ireland is NOT on The BNP 'stop list'. Other countries which are in the top ten countries of origin for UK immigrants include Germany, USA, Australia and New Zealand, are not included.
 
Well thats the problem, I couldn't find what your talking about.
and then you have the gall to post links to "none-fascist" sources of bnp documents. if you don't know how to search the bnp site to find things like their constitution or their activist guides, that's your look-out: but it's all on there, and the bnp site's a fuck of a lot better than that of 'anti-fascists' like searchlight.
 
(You might like to break that link.)

Redwatch is not exactly a BNP publication, you know, Greasy.
 
yeah I know but they clearly aim to intimidate the BNP's opponents, exposing some sort of link. Probly wouldn't stand up in a legal sense but hey.
Im not internet savvy enough to break a link, I'll do it now.
 
[url/[/url]

If the BNP are a democratic party then why are people exercising their "democratic rights" against the BNP having their pics and personal details published on a site that incites violence against them?
good enough for for an anti-fascists, but you need hard evidence of BNP collusion to convince a bnp member/supporter/voter/waiverer.
 
I've always took a mixed view to Searchlight as practical means of spreading a message. The whole Hope not Hate crap is meaningless but there have been times when recourses have been tight and they just send a load of newspapers for free that I've found myself giving them to people or pushing them through letter boxes.
Feedback from people about them has been mixed too, to some it smacks of the very establishment "be tolerant" crap that they hate, to others it seems to sew the seeds of doubt about the BNP.
The BNP's web site is "better" in so far as it's an activists' site.
 
Back
Top Bottom