Frankie Jack
Not a bloke..
I believe he has his eye on wheeching the SNHS under wastemonster control so of course he doesn't want independence. Possibly to remind him how pre-Tory NHS worked.
It changes its name to the M74 as it reaches the border, but you wouldn't notice.
(I should add, so as not to offend my father in law who is obsessed by these things, that it is actually called the A74(M) at first before becoming the M74).
Maybe Burnham is worried we'll ask for all the road surfaces back, covered as they are with tar McAdam. Which is ours.
Hasn't he got a health service to save?
There is nothing compelling a PCS member to vote the same way as the union endorsement.
No it's not - and i doubt mamy people will be campaigning within the union on the issue of the referendum. To cmapiagners i doubt it will effect things one way or another (expect to give w/c colouration to elements of the YES vote). To individual voters why would it matter?True, but campaigning against the union endorsement is a different matter.
A number of Labour MPs are understood to have protested against proposals to give Holyrood control over air passenger duty (APD).
They warn giving Scotland powers to cut the levy may pose a threat to airports in the North of England.
Ms Lamont already faces opposition to her proposals to devolve income tax to Scotland from a number of Scottish Labour MPs.
A Devolution Commission set up to look into extra powers is due to report back ahead of the party's conference in Perth next month.
But a number of her own MPs are threatening to boycott the event in protest.
They warn that devolving income tax would mean a cut in the money Scotland receives from the Treasury through a calculation known as the 'Barnett formula', as well as a cut in the number of Scottish MPs.
We're not getting to keep Queenie now apparently, fucking ACE!!!!!!
PCS union has a national Scottish conference on the referendum today. The Herald's predicting they will come out officially in favour of a Yes vote
http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/news_and_events/events/index.cfm/pcs-scottish-conference-on-the-referendum
http://www.heraldscotland.com/polit...-as-trade-union-to-back-independence.23499995
Given that James was king of Scotland before he became king of England, I reckon the monarchy is something else the Scots could claim was their's, along with roads and penicillin. Not sure how happy that would make you
Something else to bear in mind - isn't there going to be a British GE during the negotiations around independence? So the UK negotiators may end up representing a different govt than the one they start off with. I'm sure danny la rouge has a copy of the the timetable and proceedures to hand...
Given that James was king of Scotland before he became king of England, I reckon the monarchy is something else the Scots could claim was their's, along with roads and penicillin. Not sure how happy that would make you
Something else to bear in mind - isn't there going to be a British GE during the negotiations around independence? So the UK negotiators may end up representing a different govt than the one they start off with. I'm sure danny la rouge has a copy of the the timetable and proceedures to hand...
We're not getting to keep Queenie now apparently, fucking ACE!!!!!!
Large numbers of PCS branches-my own included-have already voted for PCS not to take an official position. The article studiously ignores that fact. I was speaking to a PCS rep in DWP Glasgow branch today who is in no doubt that 'No official position' will win the vote.
The 7th May 2015 is prior to independence day, 2016,
Did you ask them about their votes in 2010 first? Because it doesn't count if you did.I broached the subject of independence with two people and one was vehemently against it and the other has yet to make up their mind.
It would me.It wouldn't surprise me if a day or two after a 'Yes' vote, the rUK Parliament got shot of Scotland on a 'sort yourself out' basis.
Did you ask them about their votes in 2010 first? Because it doesn't count if you did.
Motorists would have to drive on the right if Scotland becomes independent, claims Andy Burnham.
"I don’t want to drive up the M6 and get my passport out or have to drive on the right when I want to drive on the left," said thetransparent scaremongering clownShadow Health Secretary.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...se-they-fear-losing-power-in-Westminster.html
You twat.
This is the actual Daily Mail, not a spoof:
He has already been told that an independent Scotland may not be able to stay in the EU or keep the pound.
But now Alex Salmond faces perhaps the biggest threat his dream of Scottish statehood.
For the country’s first minister has now been warned that, if it opts for secession, Scotland might not be allowed to enter the Eurovision Song Contest.
Really? OK, I'm running off some Yes leaflets and blitzing the town.
For the country’s first minister has now been warned that, if it opts for secession, Scotland might not be allowed to enter the Eurovision Song Contest.
It's hard to tell the spoofs from the real Project Fear these days.Oh dear, I laughed so hard I need another mug of tea after that!
Belittling the notion by saying the "biggest threat to the dream of independence" is the (entirely fictional) inability to take part in Eurovision?Now I'm settled again, I'm wondering if the DM are nihilipilificating independence with that article? Well, trying to, anyway.
Honestly, bringing your 'royal' family into our house and then conveniently 'forgetting' them when you leave. Tskdanny la rouge The Mash ran that story and I think the Mail have picked up on it, totally missing that the Mash is satire Bless!
So far all these threats make me want to vote yes even more. You can take your royal family, BBC and Eurovision and shove it!