Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will you vote for independence?

Scottish independence?

  • Yes please

    Votes: 99 56.6%
  • No thanks

    Votes: 57 32.6%
  • Dont know yet

    Votes: 17 9.7%

  • Total voters
    175
I believe he has his eye on wheeching the SNHS under wastemonster control so of course he doesn't want independence. Possibly to remind him how pre-Tory NHS worked.
 
It changes its name to the M74 as it reaches the border, but you wouldn't notice.

(I should add, so as not to offend my father in law who is obsessed by these things, that it is actually called the A74(M) at first before becoming the M74).

Maybe Burnham is worried we'll ask for all the road surfaces back, covered as they are with tar McAdam. Which is ours.

Hasn't he got a health service to save? :facepalm:

Thanks for the clarification - you've probably driven over it more recently than me.

There are quite a few things the Scots could ask for back if they wanted to be proper bloody minded, including penicillin, which would potentially be more of a worry to Burnham than the possibility of driving on the right
 
http://www.scotsman.com/news/politi...dependence-no-case-disappoints-stuc-1-3314114

THE leader of Scotland’s trade union movement has said that his members are “more attracted” to the pro-independence campaign than to the campaign for continuing within the UK.

Grahame Smith, Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) general secretary, said the union was “disappointed” in the case being made for staying in the UK by the No campaign.

He made the stark claim as the umbrella trade union body launched an analysis paper on the referendum “a just Scotland” today.

The STUC, which represents, 630,000 workers, includes some of the UK’s biggest trade union such as Unite and Unison - that are affiliated to Labour.

Mr Smith said that STUC members had so far been “more attracted by the vision offered by the Yes campaign
 
True, but campaigning against the union endorsement is a different matter.
No it's not - and i doubt mamy people will be campaigning within the union on the issue of the referendum. To cmapiagners i doubt it will effect things one way or another (expect to give w/c colouration to elements of the YES vote). To individual voters why would it matter?
 
Labour leader facing revolt by MPs

Devomax ideas taking a dive.

A number of Labour MPs are understood to have protested against proposals to give Holyrood control over air passenger duty (APD).
They warn giving Scotland powers to cut the levy may pose a threat to airports in the North of England.
Ms Lamont already faces opposition to her proposals to devolve income tax to Scotland from a number of Scottish Labour MPs.
A Devolution Commission set up to look into extra powers is due to report back ahead of the party's conference in Perth next month.
But a number of her own MPs are threatening to boycott the event in protest.
They warn that devolving income tax would mean a cut in the money Scotland receives from the Treasury through a calculation known as the 'Barnett formula', as well as a cut in the number of Scottish MPs.
 
We're not getting to keep Queenie now apparently, fucking ACE!!!!!! :D

Given that James was king of Scotland before he became king of England, I reckon the monarchy is something else the Scots could claim was their's, along with roads and penicillin. Not sure how happy that would make you :p

Something else to bear in mind - isn't there going to be a British GE during the negotiations around independence? So the UK negotiators may end up representing a different govt than the one they start off with. I'm sure danny la rouge has a copy of the the timetable and proceedures to hand...
 
PCS union has a national Scottish conference on the referendum today. The Herald's predicting they will come out officially in favour of a Yes vote

http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/news_and_events/events/index.cfm/pcs-scottish-conference-on-the-referendum

http://www.heraldscotland.com/polit...-as-trade-union-to-back-independence.23499995

It's a bit of an empty article. Large numbers of PCS branches-my own included-have already voted for PCS not to take an official position. The article studiously ignores that fact. I was speaking to a PCS rep in DWP Glasgow branch today who is in no doubt that 'No official position' will win the vote. There is 3 DWP branches in Glasgow 2:1 for no official position. The HMRC branch referred to has possibly already resulted in reps resigning their position within PCS.
One of the things I find funny is the near desperate rush from Lefts/SSP/Solidarity types desperate for PCS top take a YES position effectively on a border. The very same types who for years wanted other Lefts to ignore the border in Ireland and for unions not to take Pro United Ireland positions for fear of alienating Protestant workers. The issue is much less sharp obviously but in the West of Scotland it is still an issue. Some of the crap i've heard about not bothering if working-class prods/unionist types might resign from the union is ok as Independence is more important shows a rather pathetic side to that debate. Using Independence as some kind of 'progressive/non progressive dividing line is cringingly bad.

There's plenty of straightforward arguments for a YES vote, some of the guff i'm seeing/hearing from mates is far from that.
The meeting is tomorrow btw.

On the issue of PCS not siding as it's not a union issue well of course it is as it affects government staff both sides of the border. People in my office deal with benefit claims in London, Manchester and various other cities in England. That very fact makes it a union issue. However there's one problem there, neither side have put forward anything other than it'll be better with us. For m,any members in my branch there is the fear that the work they do will simply be relocated on the system which is very easy in this 'digital' world. PCS are being asked to take a leap when no trades union rep worth their reputation or politics should ask.

Imho the Herald article is a spike from a NO supporter or a meddlesome idiot. Put out the story that YES is gonna win in a sizable, arguably most militant union, then when the 'No official position' wins the NO Campaign can say look they've pulled back. If a YES supporter put that story out then they are idiots.
 
Given that James was king of Scotland before he became king of England, I reckon the monarchy is something else the Scots could claim was their's, along with roads and penicillin. Not sure how happy that would make you :p

Something else to bear in mind - isn't there going to be a British GE during the negotiations around independence? So the UK negotiators may end up representing a different govt than the one they start off with. I'm sure danny la rouge has a copy of the the timetable and proceedures to hand...

I couldn't give a toss about the royal family whoever they are I'm afraid. The fact that James was 'ours' seems to have gone right over tory heads :D

Yes, there is a GE and one that we still vote in, again this has been pointed out to 'them' but hey ho!
 
Given that James was king of Scotland before he became king of England, I reckon the monarchy is something else the Scots could claim was their's, along with roads and penicillin. Not sure how happy that would make you :p

Something else to bear in mind - isn't there going to be a British GE during the negotiations around independence? So the UK negotiators may end up representing a different govt than the one they start off with. I'm sure danny la rouge has a copy of the the timetable and proceedures to hand...

The 7th May 2015 is prior to independence day, 2016, so Scots will vote in that general election, and you're right, the government could change. But since all 3 Westminster parties agree that Scotland won't be allowed post-it notes, thumbs or the vowels on computer keyboards, negotiations will probably not change much. ;)
 
I broached the subject of independence with two people and one was vehemently against it and the other has yet to make up their mind.
 
Large numbers of PCS branches-my own included-have already voted for PCS not to take an official position. The article studiously ignores that fact. I was speaking to a PCS rep in DWP Glasgow branch today who is in no doubt that 'No official position' will win the vote.

Very sensible.

The 7th May 2015 is prior to independence day, 2016,

Not necessarily. It wouldn't surprise me if a day or two after a 'Yes' vote, the rUK Parliament got shot of Scotland on a 'sort yourself out' basis.
 
Motorists would have to drive on the right if Scotland becomes independent, claims Andy Burnham.

"I don’t want to drive up the M6 and get my passport out or have to drive on the right when I want to drive on the left," said the transparent scaremongering clown Shadow Health Secretary.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...se-they-fear-losing-power-in-Westminster.html

You twat.

Dear Lord.

Canteen at work today. Irish colleague quips about how unfair it is that Scotland could get its independence without having to go through a civil war. English colleagues look very puzzled. 'What civil war? "

Queue quick tour of Irish history. (Well not *that* quick. ) Irish colleague tells me she's amazed by the lack of general knowledge of/interest in things Irish and wonders how I can be bothered explaining the Scottish stuff...
 
This is the actual Daily Mail, not a spoof:

He has already been told that an independent Scotland may not be able to stay in the EU or keep the pound.

But now Alex Salmond faces perhaps the biggest threat his dream of Scottish statehood.

For the country’s first minister has now been warned that, if it opts for secession, Scotland might not be allowed to enter the Eurovision Song Contest
.


Really? OK, I'm running off some Yes leaflets and blitzing the town.
 
This is the actual Daily Mail, not a spoof:

He has already been told that an independent Scotland may not be able to stay in the EU or keep the pound.

But now Alex Salmond faces perhaps the biggest threat his dream of Scottish statehood.

For the country’s first minister has now been warned that, if it opts for secession, Scotland might not be allowed to enter the Eurovision Song Contest
.


Really? OK, I'm running off some Yes leaflets and blitzing the town.

I was just reading that and thinking 'errr... what?'

This and the 'you might not be able to keep the Queen!!!1!!1' stuff. They really have no idea about us do they.
 
Now I'm settled again, I'm wondering if the DM are nihilipilificating independence with that article? Well, trying to, anyway.
 
Now I'm settled again, I'm wondering if the DM are nihilipilificating independence with that article? Well, trying to, anyway.
Belittling the notion by saying the "biggest threat to the dream of independence" is the (entirely fictional) inability to take part in Eurovision?

No, I think that's too subtle for them. They really do think it's a big threat.
 
danny la rouge The Mash ran that story and I think the Mail have picked up on it, totally missing that the Mash is satire :) Bless! :facepalm:
So far all these threats make me want to vote yes even more. You can take your royal family, BBC and Eurovision and shove it!
Honestly, bringing your 'royal' family into our house and then conveniently 'forgetting' them when you leave. Tsk :mad:

;)
 
Was in the barber's today (in London) and overheard a young guy from Dundee being asked by his barber which way he was going to vote. I thought it was a bit rude to just ask someone something like that. I guess Scots all over England are being asked the same question. Must get irritating.
 
Back
Top Bottom