less severe butIt’s been edited to just “less” now.
Sorry, forgot to include the link.
Security guard tackled Leicester Square knife attacker who stabbed two people
Witness describes ‘mentally disturbed’ suspect behind attack, as girl, 11, and woman, 34, taken to hospitalwww.theguardian.com
I saw that article and was going to add it to this thread.A moment that changed me: I put people-pleasing aside – and told my new boyfriend the truth
I had gulped down oysters despite my deep dislike of them for years. Suddenly I knew the pretence had to endwww.theguardian.com
tldr?
Oysters, ffs! She pretends to like oysters.
By the time I met Chris, I’d got faking oysters down to a fine art, although I still felt like the child in The Emperor’s New Clothes, itching to call people out on what seemed to me like pretension. That said, I had come to enjoy the ritual: the platter mounded with sparkling shavings of ice, the crowning with lemon, even the loosening of the mollusc from its pearly white shell. I just refused to believe anyone really enjoyed the oysters themselves.
Hungry HeartIn a genuinely crowded field this must be one of the most witless things the guardian has every published - behold the final paragraph, it's one of ths you feel more stupid for having read:
A few oysters have come close, but for now what I love most is the metaphor these molluscs, suddenly shucked of their shells, have inadvertently created: realising how much richer life is if people like and accept you for being you, rather than for being someone who likes oysters.
This is an extract from her book 'Hungey Heart' which is a title in search of a topic if ever there was one...
I liked the 'I've given up people pleasing but I'm continuing to eat this thing I really don't like because my BF does.' I mean that's just weird.In a genuinely crowded field this must be one of the most witless things the guardian has every published - behold the final paragraph, it's one of ths you feel more stupid for having read:
A few oysters have come close, but for now what I love most is the metaphor these molluscs, suddenly shucked of their shells, have inadvertently created: realising how much richer life is if people like and accept you for being you, rather than for being someone who likes oysters.
This is an extract from her book 'Hungey Heart' which is a title in search of a topic if ever there was one...
i thought his first big mistake (post 4 july) was the winter fuel allowanceToday Martin Kettle's er, forensic political intellect is turned to the important matter of whether Kier Starmer was right to cancel his holiday or not.
In cancelling his family summer holiday, Keir Starmer has made his first serious mistake | Martin Kettle
The days when Harold Macmillan could disappear to the grouse moors for the summer are gone – but even prime ministers need a break, says Guardian columnist Martin Kettlewww.theguardian.com
Apparently it's his first big mistake as Prime Minister and the "journalist" intones pompously his hope that Sir Kieth does politics differently next year.
Meanwhile, a nation shrugs. It's the depth of the silly season and clearly Martin is in need of his Tuscan holiday. Poor chap.
Today Martin Kettle's er, forensic political intellect is turned to the important matter of whether Kier Starmer was right to cancel his holiday or not.
In cancelling his family summer holiday, Keir Starmer has made his first serious mistake | Martin Kettle
The days when Harold Macmillan could disappear to the grouse moors for the summer are gone – but even prime ministers need a break, says Guardian columnist Martin Kettlewww.theguardian.com
Apparently it's his first big mistake as Prime Minister and the "journalist" intones pompously his hope that Sir Kieth does politics differently next year.
Meanwhile, a nation shrugs. It's the depth of the silly season and clearly Martin is in need of his Tuscan holiday. Poor chap.
This article was amended on 19 August 2024 to remove an incorrect reference in the subheading to the project costing £150m. Also, part of the museum will be situated underground at the same level as passing Thameslink trains, not Crosslink trains as stated in an earlier version.
A friend who works in heritage was talking about this article yesterday. He said their existence is absolutely not a shock as they've been known about for a very long time though they weren't publicly accessible (he visited them years ago for work).Vaults of ambition: shock find under London Museum enchants its builders
Discovery of Victorian network hiding under some of city’s busiest streets set ‘magical’ new challenge for multimillion pound projectwww.theguardian.com
Guardian inventing new train lines. Crossrail? Thameslink? Why not both?
Aye, it's bonkers stuff. But I found the article article to be quite interesting, once I started reading itFocusing on the important stuff:
Kamala Harris wore a tan suit to day one of the DNC – what does it mean?
Some argued the suit was actually camel, while others online speculated Harris was trolling Republicans – or simply wearing her off duty suitwww.theguardian.com
(Seriously, does anyone GAF about this nonsense?)
Focusing on the important stuff:
Kamala Harris wore a tan suit to day one of the DNC – what does it mean?
Some argued the suit was actually camel, while others online speculated Harris was trolling Republicans – or simply wearing her off duty suitwww.theguardian.com
(Seriously, does anyone GAF about this nonsense?)
Same happened to May (to a lesser extent) and to almost any woman in politics over here as well. There are no articles on Trumps suits.Stateside some do. Clinton's jumpsuits were the source of endless carping from right wing males during the 2016 campaign. Who'd have thought they'd be fashionistas?
A few days agoSame happened to May (to a lesser extent) and to almost any woman in politics over here as well. There are no articles on Trumps suits.
fair play. Although it is on the 'fashion' page, not the 'US election' page, as KH's is
A friend who works in heritage was talking about this article yesterday. He said their existence is absolutely not a shock as they've been known about for a very long time though they weren't publicly accessible (he visited them years ago for work).
I knew just from the headline that it was a reference to the furore over Obama wearing a tan suit that time, but I appreciate the reference would go over most people's heads.Focusing on the important stuff:
Kamala Harris wore a tan suit to day one of the DNC – what does it mean?
Some argued the suit was actually camel, while others online speculated Harris was trolling Republicans – or simply wearing her off duty suitwww.theguardian.com
(Seriously, does anyone GAF about this nonsense?)
People have ridiculed Trump's weirdly long ties though. And his comb-over hair. And his MAGA baseball caps. (My theory is that he made the MAGA baseball caps his thing because of open-air rallies and the risk of his comb-over being blown askew without the cap.) And there's also been speculation about his bulky trousers and whether he wears adult diapers. So there has been lots of commentary/ridicule of Trump's personal appearance.Same happened to May (to a lesser extent) and to almost any woman in politics over here as well. There are no articles on Trumps suits.
He's made his political career out of ridiculing how people (especially women) look/talk/laugh/present etcthat's all justified though
Jesus, I really didn't need that mental image.And there's also been speculation about his bulky trousers and whether he wears adult diapers.
"pantsuit"Same happened to May (to a lesser extent) and to almost any woman in politics over here as well. There are no articles on Trumps suits.