Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

The bigots st the spa claimed the interloper was trans. There is zero evidence this person is/was trans. And the bigots (your bigots) did then side with the proud boy scum. That’s whose side you’re on.

if you disagree, write a letter isn’t that what you do best?

tldr - terfs are scum

Most of the bigots aren't T.E.R.F's.

T.E.R.F. has a specific meaning.

A T.E R.F is a trans-exlusionary radical feminist. The phrase was created by radical feminists to differentiate the types/attitudes of other radical feminists.

It's not helpful to call people T.E.R.F's when we mean transphobes or bigots.

We may believe that all T.E.R.F's are transphobic bigots (or we may not) but not all transphobic bigots are T.E.R.F's either way.

Very few people involved in events at or outside the Wii Spa were radical feminists, or indeed any kind of feminist.
 
Most of the bigots aren't T.E.R.F's.

T.E.R.F. has a specific meaning.

A T.E R.F is a trans-exlusionary radical feminist. The phrase was created by radical feminists to differentiate the types/attitudes of other radical feminists.

It's not helpful to call people T.E.R.F's when we mean transphobes or bigots.

We may believe that all T.E.R.F's are transphobic bigots (or we may not) but not all transphobic bigots are T.E.R.F's either way.

Very few people involved in events at or outside the Wii Spa were radical feminists, or indeed any kind of feminist.
True, tho the actual terf’s did pick up on and use the incident with their usual honesty. And the incident does show what Butler says in her reply - that the far right use gender essentialism as a form of attack and the terfs (and other exclusionary types) will not oppose them.
 
True, tho the actual terf’s did pick up on and use the incident with their usual honesty. And the incident does show what Butler says in her reply - that the far right use gender essentialism as a form of attack and the terfs (and other exclusionary types) will not oppose them.

Yep.
 
There is no need for it to whatsoever. The topic under discussion is guardian censorship. Do you approve?
I agree with this, it's outrageous. It should have been left as is.

The Guardian should have added an editor’s note after the journalists question, factually stating the charges and making clear that these were made after the interview.
 
I had a look on Twitter and I can't find anyone anywhere who says 'Yes, they were correct to remove the paragraphs.'
 
so clive sinclair's died and the guardian has decided to promote him to inventor of the pocket calculator
1631814605897.png
only their link goes to Sinclair Cambridge pocket calculator | Science Museum Group Collection which says his calculator's from 1973 (and made of cheap components)
sinclair's offering was preceded by japanese, american, and yugoslavian offerings:
1631814905254.png

once again the guardian is full of fail
 
so clive sinclair's died and the guardian has decided to promote him to inventor of the pocket calculator
View attachment 288635
only their link goes to Sinclair Cambridge pocket calculator | Science Museum Group Collection which says his calculator's from 1973 (and made of cheap components)
sinclair's offering was preceded by japanese, american, and yugoslavian offerings:
View attachment 288637

once again the guardian is full of fail
the BBC bulletins on the radio tonight were also introducing Sinclair as "inventor of the pocket calculator". I wonder if there's a common source of the error in a wire service report or something they've both just copied.
 
Wikipedia says Texas Instruments were the first to develop a pocket calculator, although a Japanese company called BUSICOM made the first commercially available one.

Have sent a correction request to the BBC. I might have said the error was appalling given the information is easily available.
 
Last edited:
Wikipedia says Texas Instruments were the first to develop a pocket calculator.
It seems Sinclair were the first to launch a "slimline" pocket calculator, but the calculator bit of the electronics was bought off TI. Sinclair made a thinner housing and did something apparently clever with the power input.
 
It seems Sinclair were the first to launch a "slimline" pocket calculator, but the calculator bit of the electronics was bought off TI. Sinclair made a thinner housing and did something apparently clever with the power input.
But there were earlier pocket calculator models on the market. I am not disputing he improved it, but he did not invent the concept.
 
But there were earlier pocket calculator models on the market. I am not disputing he improved it, but he did not invent the concept.
He or someone he employed invented the "slimline" pocket calculator. After that, I would guess someone invented the slimline pocket calculator with an little red "on" light. And so on.
 
He or someone he employed invented the "slimline" pocket calculator. After that, I would guess someone invented the slimline pocket calculator with an little red "on" light. And so on.
I manage inventions for a living. I am telling you, he did not invent the first pocket calculator.
 
Back
Top Bottom