Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

"Hey, I've got an idea. After Starmer loses the next general election, let's start a grassroots campaign to get a 'proper left-winger' from the backbenches onto the ballot paper for the resultant leadership contest.

Why has no one thought of this before?"

No idea if your being serious but if you are i'm in
 
Ive noticed lately they have a lot of links to old stories on the front page that if you dont know they are old can be misleading as when you click on them, the resulting page has no date, sloppy
They have a big yellow banner on them if they’re more than a few weeks old
 
"Hey, I've got an idea. After Starmer loses the next general election, let's start a grassroots campaign to get a 'proper left-winger' from the backbenches onto the ballot paper for the resultant leadership contest.

Why has no one thought of this before?"

No idea if your being serious but if you are i'm in
?
 
There does seem to have been a very strange reaction to that speech from the labour centrists on my radar - they all seem to think it's some knockout blow, and they seem genuine in their belief.

It feels like political discourse right now is just a series of parallel realities that never actually meet anywhere. Has it always been this bad?
 
There does seem to have been a very strange reaction to that speech from the labour centrists on my radar - they all seem to think it's some knockout blow, and they seem genuine in their belief.

It feels like political discourse right now is just a series of parallel realities that never actually meet anywhere. Has it always been this bad?
If I were to ask the kabbess, who is a far-left sympathiser in principle and frequently a soft-left liberal in practice*, what she thought of Starmer's knockout speech, she would (a) need a moment to remember who Keir Starmer is; and (b) would have no idea what the speech was.


*e.g. has voted a combination of Labour (pre-Iraq and Corbyn), Lib Dem (post-Iraq, pre-coalition) and Green (coalition to Crobyn) in past elections

***
ETA: I just tested this theory. She did actually know straight away who Starmer is but had no idea he had made a speech. I told her what was in it and she just laughed and said, "I really liked Corbyn."
 
Last edited:
Yes I assumed they were talking about far right and people like the RCP, and certainly any centrists who support the inequalities in society as it is now. Didn't actually read the article though.
 
Apparently if you’re not centrist enough, you are a dumb dumb says boffin professor at Cambridge.

Without clicking on the link, I suspect that's an example of subs trying to summarise a complex cognitive study in ten words or fewer, and massively fucking it up. Reminiscent of the Mail and cancer.
 
and I know this will amaze many but he's lying :eek: he's trying to spin it that he was asking challenging questions to those in power:

The prime minister’s press secretary, Allegra Stratton, said Johnson was referring to the job of reporters in holding the government to account, saying: “That is the prime minister talking about the fact that you … as journalists your job is to constantly challenge and that’s something that makes all of us in government better.”

While it was of course:

But others may reflect on Johnson’s record of writing in derogatory terms about groups other than politicians without necessarily “putting yourself in the place of the person you’re criticising”.

In a 2018 column for the Daily Telegraph, he wrote that women who wore burkas were choosing “to go around looking like letter boxes” or “a bank robber”. In a 2002 column for the same newspaper, he described black people as “piccaninnies” and referred to “watermelon smiles”, language for which he later apologised but claimed had been taken out of context. In a 1998 column, again for the Telegraph, he used the phrase “tank-topped bumboys” to describe gay men.

By the time he finally gave up the column when he became foreign secretary, Johnson was paid £275,000 a year, about £4.80 a word.

As well as a columnist for the Daily Telegraph, he was a Brussels reporter for the same newspaper and editor of the Spectator. As a reporter he had a reputation for filing exaggerated, if colourful, stories and was famously fired from his first job at the Times after making up a quote and attributing it to his godfather.

Since changing professions, the prime minister is said to have sometimes taken umbrage when facing negative press himself. The columnist and former newspaper editor Sir Max Hastings wrote in 2019: “I have handwritten notes from our possible next prime minister, threatening dire consequences in print if I continued to criticise him.”

 
Top story today: Blair says they should've been able to develop a vaccine in 100 days.

Notwithstanding trials, which necessarily take time because you're trying to judge if something that takes weeks or months to work actually works, 'they' did actually develop multiple vaccines in something like 100 days. I'm sure all those researchers who sweated blood to create vaccines on a world-record timescale will be delighted to hear that everyone's favourite war criminal has decided their efforts weren't good enough.
 
Back
Top Bottom