Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why are pedestrian deaths not as well reported as cyclists?

roryer

道可道非常道,名可名非常名
I believe a 32 year old woman was killed crossing the road outside City Thameslink at 2210 on October 20th. I may have some information incorrect, but was searching on Google for details and there is nothing.

I wonder why this is not news?
 
It's interesting to see that, in terms of deaths per million inhabitants, the UK is still one of the safest places in Europe. Having lived in Portugal it doesn't surprise me that their figures are almost double the UK. I might make this the subject of a conversation lesson.

Just because it is relatively safe in the UK doesn't mean that improving safety wouldn't be good.
 
Purely anecdotally, I recall 3 pedestrian deaths that were vaguely reported in my area in recent years, all involved people over 70 years of age.

And last March 2 people in their 30's and 40's were killed in one go and it was all over the news.
 
With pedestrians it's often their mistake, walking in front of a car without looking, or it's a freak accident where a car drives onto the pavement. There aren't that many concrete things which can be done, pavements are for pedestrians and roads for cars and mostly it works. You still read about those deaths when a crime has been committed, but not when it was an accident. While the same can be true with cyclists, often the reason for their deaths has to with things like dangerous or no cycling paths, dangerous roundabouts and lorries with poor sight lines and in those cases something can be done. There is a campaign for cycling safety ongoing. Nothing will ever be 100% safe but there simply isn't that much which can be done to protect pedestrians further while there is plenty of room for improvement when it comes to cycling in London (I stopped because I find it too stressful).

Most people who commit suicide on the underground you never read about. There are so many and there isn't really that much which can be done.
 
Last edited:
The Standard had a picture of the young Italian cyclist in Battersea killed the other day plastered all over their front page. Can't think why.

Lucia-Ciccioli-1.jpg
 
I guess its because "Pedestrians" don't feel the need to define themselves by the way they choose travel about town.
 
doesn't matter how they define themselves werdo, if you are walking you are a pedestrian, cycling a cyclist, driving a driver.
 
The Standard had a picture of the young Italian cyclist in Battersea killed the other day plastered all over their front page. Can't think why.

Lucia-Ciccioli-1.jpg
The hypocritical Mail probably had a pic of her in a bikini on their website! Necrophiliac porn is very popular among DM types apparently.
 
doesn't matter how they define themselves werdo, if you are walking you are a pedestrian, cycling a cyclist, driving a driver.

except that there is a cycling "community" and the papers know they can be relied upon for clickbait, hence lots of articles about cycling that are designed to get comments/social media shares.
Suspect that carries over to reporting cyclist deaths even though the articles are not clickbait.
 
Cyclists have a "loud" collective voice. There are dozens of campaigning groups for cyclists, as opposed to pedestrians who have few safety/campaigning groups. The Ramblers doesn't do safety, Living Streets a little but you never hear of them.
 
Cyclists have a "loud" collective voice. There are dozens of campaigning groups for cyclists, as opposed to pedestrians who have few safety/campaigning groups. The Ramblers doesn't do safety, Living Streets a little but you never hear of them.

Yes, and cycle campaigners are very good at social media and have lots of 'social capital'. I don't buy the trope of cycling being a moneyed middle class form of transport but it is true of cycle campaigners.
 
It's interesting to see that, in terms of deaths per million inhabitants, the UK is still one of the safest places in Europe. Having lived in Portugal it doesn't surprise me that their figures are almost double the UK. I might make this the subject of a conversation lesson.

Just because it is relatively safe in the UK doesn't mean that improving safety wouldn't be good.

I have heard an argument that the UK is relatively low as fewer people walk / cycle.

It's not really surprising as the priority is always to provide safe roads for vehicles.
 
Deaths from air pollution are in the news again. If 50,000 lives were being cut short with any other preventable cause it would be a huge scandal.

However we seem ready to accept these deaths. The burden on owners of desiel and the most polluting vehicles in rectifying this is considered too great.
 
It's to do with the way news is reported. Cycle deaths, particularly in London, contribute to a narrative about improving cycling safety.

Attaching news items to existing narratives is very common. The extreme example is the US elections where it just becomes 2yrs of lazy journalism.
 
I think we need to focus on pedestrian deaths. Huge issue largely ignored. The interesting thing is pedestrians prefer to complain about cyclists rather than the vehicles that kill.
 
I think we need to focus on pedestrian deaths. Huge issue largely ignored. The interesting thing is pedestrians prefer to complain about cyclists rather than the vehicles that kill.
Yeh cos there have been no stories ever about cyclists killing pedestrians and it's only when you start killing people that they have a right to complain
 
Back
Top Bottom