Does any actual evidence exist to support the claim that there is a genetic component to gender roles?
only reaching 'evidence'.
Does any actual evidence exist to support the claim that there is a genetic component to gender roles?
Culture is a choice. Ethnicity isn't. Who hell gets to choose their parents and where they are born?
We are though predisposed to engage in identity, what's so bad about wanting to choose that. Tom Cruise can play a European who becomes a Samurai... overcoming not actually being born Japanese. God help a white woman who really wants to go method on this being a black American lark.
Some of us may choose to adopt an ethnicity we weren't born into.
Well as Rutita said, the biggest problem is that she's a liar. But these post-being-found-out justifications are still fucked up. She's wrong on at least two counts. First, she's trying to turn racial identity into some essential thing to being human, which it very clearly isn't. But at the same time as this essentialist nonsense, she also seemed to think that by dying her skin and changing her hair, she was becoming 'black', neglecting all the non-essentialist crap that goes in to growing up black in a racist state like the US. She manages to both overstate and understate the significance of race and racial identity in the society she grew up in.
I take your point, but her point was that she was American and grew up in America. She didn't claim to have grown up somewhere else.I'll have to read the link before I can comment on most of that, but being black means growing up in a racist white society... therefore people from African countries who haven't ever experienced racism at the hands of white people in the day to day sense you mean (global economic injustices of power and economics impacting societies and histories not withstanding for reasons of another level) therefore aren't black, because they did not experience growing up in racist America.
Does any actual evidence exist to support the claim that there is a genetic component to gender roles?
Not sure how that predisposes women to do e.g. housework and sewing. Would be grateful for any illumination you can offer. Let me just finish the washing up and I'll be with you.Like breast milk, for example?
Not sure how that predisposes women to do e.g. housework and sewing. Would be grateful for any illumination you can offer. Let me just finish the washing up and I'll be with you.
Yeh. But that's clearly not what lbj is talking about. That is one gender role. There are others. Do you think women ended up doing the work they do on the basis of genetics: or would you agree with me that what constitutes women's work is a cultural construct?Nice straw man. It obviously dictates who feeds the infant, historically speaking.
Yeh. But that's clearly not what lbj is talking about. That is one gender role. There are others. Do you think women ended up doing the work they do on the basis of genetics: or would you agree with me that what constitutes women's work is a cultural construct?
apparently it's all to do with agriculture (guardian link)Mixed but mostly a construct.
I think historically it made sense for the woman to be at home if she had young and for others to go out hunting which might involve the father but equally other women. But milk producer made you primary child rearer/protector which isn't conducive to fighting sabre toothed tigers if you want the best chance for your offspring. And that biological position may have instructed how things developed culturally between gender roles.
The fact they're expected to do this work for free under capitalism is an interesting discussion and definitely comes from patriarchy / ownership of women by men.
apparently it's all to do with agriculture (guardian link)
maybe the primmies are right against the odds.That article makes sense. Move resource accumulation to attain egalitarianism again.
maybe the primmies are right against the odds.
On that basis, it's hard to distinguish been transsexualism and transracialism. Though, instinctively, I'm dubious about the latter.
Even if that were true (and it's by no means settled), the fact that some transsexuals have certain brain characteristics isn't evidence for the idea of female or make brains. At most, or could be a weak correlation in trans v cis brains i.e. that trans people have brains similar to each other, but not, necessarily, to cis people of the gender with which they identify.Study on the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis a decade or so ago suggested a brain pattern link in (certain?) transsexuals.
No but it suggested that, in this area males and females had different brain patterning and that m/f transsexuals (for instance) had brain patterns similar to women. And this was regardless of hormone use. I can't find a proper link but this might doEven if that were true, the fact that some transsexuals have certain brain characteristics isn't evidence for the idea of female or make brains.
there are so: living and deadThere are not 2 types of brains FFS.
No but it suggested that, in this area males and females had different brain patterning and that m/f transsexuals (for instance) had brain patterns similar to women. And this was regardless of hormone use. I can't find a proper link but this might do
A Sex Difference in the Human Brain and its Relation to Transsexuality
Well, no of course there can't be, politically. That would be unthinkable.There are not 2 types of brains FFS.
No, there just aren't.Well, no of course there can't be, politically. That would be unthinkable.
But there might be, biologically.
i can google too!
i can google too!