i envy you trots your problems. at least youse engage.
With each other? Swapping (no pun intended) leaflets?
it's more than the International Cricket Conference does!
i envy you trots your problems. at least youse engage.
Yes, it's just great, if you like dysfunctional families
Their house is a museum.at least you're a family!
Their house is a museum.
I was thinking earlier today that it's a remarkable that a tendency or tradition whose roots date back to the 1890s/1900s, and which still has doctrinal continuities with those roots (unlike the social democratic parties), should even exist, and retain the ability to be players, in a small way, in a few countries (I mean Trotskyism in general, not just the Sparts).
Perfect opportunity to rebuild the fourth internationalDo we have their line on Ukraine?
Rebuilding the Fourth International is the political equivalent of repainting the Forth BridgePerfect opportunity to rebuild the fourth international
Rebuilding the Fourth International is the political equivalent of repainting the Forth Bridge
That’s why Workers Power’s Fifth International used CuprinolRebuilding the Fourth International is the political equivalent of repainting the Forth Bridge
They balanced the millennium foot bridge in LondonThat’s why Workers Power’s Fifth International used Cuprinol
I'll put this here because I don't want to pollute the discussion on the war.
This is from Tom Riley's Bolshevik Tendency. The particulars of the analysis don't interest me very much. The belief that what they write on their website is of historical significance is more interesting. This is the product of living in your head (and never setting foot outside) for 50 years or more:
We know that the ranks of the TF, IG and even the WSWS, are mainly composed of serious subjective revolutionaries. We appeal to them to think through the politics and potential geopolitical stakes in the current confrontation. The WSWS correctly describes it as “in essence, and in fact, a war between NATO and Russia”—in this war Trotskyists have a side, despite the unpleasant character of Putin’s reactionary bonapartist regime. It is not too late to break with muddleheaded centrism and the “anti-war” pacifist neutrality which, at bottom, represents a capitulation to imperialist ideological pressure.
This is no time for sitting on the fence—if Russia successfully “de-Nato-izes” Ukraine, it will make the world a safer place for the Chinese deformed workers’ state, Iran, Syria, Venezuela and the many other countries targeted by the rapacious US imperialism and its allies. A NATO triumph over Russia in Ukraine will represent the opposite, and bring humanity one step closer to the risk of annihilation.
Down with social-pacifist neutrality—Ukraine has no ‘right’ to join NATO!
The international workers’ movement must defend Russia against imperialist encroachment!
Smash capitalism through world socialist workers’ revolution!
That is one of the ickiest things I've ever readAs a distraction in these stressful times here are a few more wise words from James Robertson, great revolutionary leader, about one year before his sudden, shocking and totally unexpected degeneration. He's talking in 1977 about how the Spartacist League was first given life:
"The Spartacist League of the U.S. has been built through regroupment and recruitment and in the flowing continuity of the history of Trotskyism, it has not been built the way that a pearl is built. When you unfold all the layers of a pearl, at the bottom you find a piece of hard quartz. The first act in the creation of the Spartacist League was sexual, that is to say, two components came together in a regroupment. And the sexual experience of accretion has continued since. Some comrades don't understand this and since they come in as outsiders, right, in a regroupment, they continue to feel themselves strangers. This is a pathological reaction that is false and I encourage all the comrades to examine where all the rest of us came from. It was all sexual."
Interesting imagery, is it not?
It's from a Talk on Party History in this internal bulletin. The whole talk is 15 pages long and impossible to follow unless you already know the history (so what's the purpose of the talk?)