Reno
The In Kraut
Give the book a try, maybe you'll like it. It's one of my favourite novels of the last couple of decades and it is different from the film in that it has far more of a plot and concrete themes. I don't think it shines more of a light on the film because the film deliberately leaves events open to interpretation and if you've read the book you are more likely to interpret it along those lines, which for me got in the way. The central character in the book is quite different to start with, a surgically altered quadruped who is described as rather grotesque and who barely passes for human.That it was, I agree there.
I can certainly understand how people like it (it's not "beyond me"), I just happen to disagree. The film very publicly divides opinion. It's not worth having a snit over. The reason I brought up the book (and my experience was contrary - almost all of the positive reviews I read were from people who'd read the book) is because I was hoping to glean something more about why some people like it so much. I was kind of hoping you'd explain something more about it.
While I was initially disappointed that the film is such a loose interpretation, now I think it's one of the things which are admirable about it. So many faithful adaptations feel like mere illustrations of a text, which reduce rather than enhance it and add little to the experience of reading the book. The film of Under the Skin completely becomes its own thing and the only aspect it is really faithful too is its atmosphere and the concept of looking at our world through alien eyes.
It is a deliberately slow and repetitive film. To some that approach is boring, to me it was hypnotic.