Monsters Vs Aliens.
It's the second time I have watched it, not sure why I watched it again. It's ok I suppose.
I thought it was incredibly weak and overlongt
i'm going to watch that tomorrow - what did you make of it?
A Serbian Film
i watched it today and didnt like it at all.turned it off halfway through.
I'll have to have a think about that one a bit more because I only just finished watching it. I wasn't that shocked by it, probably because it has been hyped up as the most shocking thing ever and I have seen a lot of extreme cinema. I really braced myself and then it wasn't quite as bad as imagined it would be. I've seen more mainstream films that I've been more offended by (Fatal Attraction, Looking for Mr Goodbar, Dancer in the Dark) because I found what they had to say more offensive. Politically this film doesn't say anything I find offensive and in the end it's just a movie with special effects. It quite obviously is made as a provocation and I never took it seriously, because. I never felt that engaged by the characters. There is one moment involving an extreme eye injury (and then some) that did actually make me laugh in its gross out outrageousness, but then I've seen a lot extreme cinema.
I would really like to know more about what is behind it. It's clearly meant as a satire and there are moments that are incredibly gross in conception if still fairly conventional in execution. It's never more explicit than a Hostel film, it's just that it keeps breaking a few last taboos that push buttons. I've read reports about war crimes during the Bosnian war some of this reminded me of and I wonder he is sharing some of the horror of that. Then you have to go, well compared to the real thing, enduring this film is nothing.
That said, I can see that this would make many people short circuit. There is quite a bit of simulated kiddie sex in it and it's just a taboo that many people won't ever want to confront. As soon as you are exposed to this type of imagery, there is already the lingering accusation that it's something you want to see and are turned on by. I'm quite secure in the knowledge that fucking children doesn't do anything for me, so I took the simulated sex with children as the ultimate provocation and regarded it as what it was supposed to be, the dead baby joke to end them all. It's like a Chapman Brothers sculpture on celluloid
I'm pretty sure that just watching the film and especially saying anything in defence of it will put you on the naughty step for many people, but I don't actually regret having seen it as I feared I would.
That's fair enough and I think it may be a sensible response for most people.
curiosity perhaps?Then why were you able to finish it?
are you sure it's the same film?Googling it, I realize that I've seen this movie, although it was called 'The Professional'. You know, I can't recall there being child sex scenes in it - maybe they were cut out or something. Or maybe it just didn't stick in my memory.
My recollection was that it was a pretty good film.
are you sure it's the same film?
The one I saw is directed by Luc Besson, starring Jean Reno.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Léon_(film)
are you sure it's the same film?
eta: you're confused. reno is talking about 'a serbian film'. you are talking about 'leon'. read.
Vukmir shows Milos a clip of a man helping a woman give birth to a baby girl; the man then proceeds to rape the newborn in what the director calls "newborn porn
The covers are taken off of the body Milos is raping and it is Milos' young son, drugged and in a state of shock.
He says start with the little one, and an actor unzips himself.
<a big sigh>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Serbian_Film
Give me a fucking break.
I'll have to go back and reread the posts trying to intellectualize the voyeurism necessary to watch such trash.
Actually I just realised what A Serbian Film really reminded my of and in what spirit I took it. It's like the film version of the showbusiness joke The Aristocrats, the one the documentary is about.
See, just as I said, you just mention that you watched the film and some twat will start with the tabloid style moral outrage.
Any morals dissimilar from your own are not automatically 'tabloid-style' morals.
What moral structure is it that allows one to obtain either pleasure or enlightenment from a movie such as the one described in the wikipedia entry? The mere fact that someone was able to think up the plot line and then convince someone to fund the project, doesn't confer automatic credibility on the product.
You still are a silly twit Canuck and you always will be. I'm off to bed....
Seen Cloudy with a chance of meatballs?