articul8
Dishonest sociopath
The Christian doctrine is the paedophilic doctrine.
this is about as blatant as trolling gets - you've put a bit of effort in creating this persona I'll grant you
The Christian doctrine is the paedophilic doctrine.
The Christian doctrine is the paedophilic doctrine.
this is about as blatant as trolling gets - you've put a bit of effort in creating this persona I'll grant you
Xianity elevates it to a cosmic principle, yes. But even allowing that Xianity also tends to desexualise childhood, while it insinuates there is nothing natural about sexuality, it seems a heck of a leap to pedophilic violence.The Christian doctrine of love assumes only an empty (now positively charged, sexualized) appearance for children.
In the Christian doctrine, and partly as a leftover of the paganism it appropriates, in its attempt to generalize love, extends its principle to everything, to no human qualities, that's why it, by way of its teachings, has to belatedly and in christian spirit assume paedophilic violence. After all, there is nothing natural about sexuality.
Is it the office which corrupts these people, or what? Are they just thrill-seeking perverts who love the idea of blaspheming in such an epic way? Or perhaps they are dominated by their urges yet remain intensely guilty about them, such that an on-off cycle of piety and depravity is the only way they can maintain sanity?
Xianity also tends to desexualise childhood, while it insinuates there is nothing natural about sexuality, it seems a heck of a leap to pedophilic violence.
um, that word natural ... I'm not sure it means what you think it means.When I said there really is nothing natural about sexuality, there really is nothing natural about it.
And any gesture I make to you will therefore be a destructive one that I cannot ever foreclose and in a designated space.
Xianity elevates it to a cosmic principle, yes. But even allowing that Xianity also tends to desexualise childhood, while it insinuates there is nothing natural about sexuality, it seems a heck of a leap to pedophilic violence.
It's like trying to decipher the writings of a member of the Frankfurt school after said member has suffered a massive neurological insult.
Are you possessed by the spirit of gorski?
It's only a "heck of a leap" if you're rational, though, not if you're playing the part of a holy fool a la ibn Khaldoun.
I also reject your accusation, .
No, Christianity makes paedophilia possible through the effects of some of the non-biblical injunctions it lays upon the priesthood. Celibacy and chastity are not part of the usual human practice.Christianity makes paedophilia possible institutionally because love is abstracted from human qualities.
No paedophile was a paedophile before he became one.No catholic preist was a paedo before he became one.