I agree, being in a pub with a whingey toddler is annoying. However, Wetherspoons is not somewhere I would go for a quiet, adult only drink on a weekend daytime - at least my local isn't, it's always packed with families at the weekend.
Yeah this is why I didn't go anywhere at all with my middle child and I only 'inflict' youngest on pubs in daytime for short periods. We're very child unfriendly in general in England, from what I remember, Scotland are even worse (for not wanting young kids on the premises). I can't speak for Wales.There's loads of places parents with young kids can go to socialise without imposing screaming kids on people who want a quiet drink. To sit in a pub and do nothing whilst your baby cries is selfish. Both towards the kid and the other patrons of the pub. If my kids cry in a pub I try to settle them; if I can't, I take them outside for a walk; if that doesn't work, I take them home.
I don't see how anyone could object to anyone taking kids to a kid's venue, or even on a bus or train. But I can't help but think that a pub isn't a good place for bawling infants. To my mind, that's not being unfriendly to kids; rather it's being fair to other people. And I love kids and am the main carer for mine. I don't want to see anyone isolated, but I do find the some people's sense of entitlement a bit frustrating. The truth is that people can't have it all. The way I see it, unless you're willing to impose your choices on others, then, if you choose kids, that's going to preclude some adult activities.Yeah this is why I didn't go anywhere at all with my middle child and I only 'inflict' youngest on pubs in daytime for short periods. We're very child unfriendly in general in England, from what I remember, Scotland are even worse (for not wanting young kids on the premises). I can't speak for Wales.
I didn't even go to places that are supposed to be for babies because he cried, but it is isolating and everyone seems to be judging you no matter what you do. Old women are the worse but the amount of sneering you get for even getting on a train/ bus with a kid that's crying.
There are loads of child free places though! If I go pretty much anywhere after 8pm I can 99% guarantee I won't see anyone younger than 12. I take my kid to places lateish (up to about 9pm) and he is normally the only child there.I don't see how anyone could object to anyone taking kids to a kid's venue, or even on a bus or train. But I can't help but think that a pub isn't a good place for bawling infants. To my mind, that's not being unfriendly to kids; rather it's being fair to other people. And I love kids and am the main carer for mine. I don't want to see anyone isolated, but I do find the some people's sense of entitlement a bit frustrating. The truth is that people can't have it all. The way I see it, unless you're willing to impose your choices on others, then, if you choose kids, that's going to preclude some adult activities.
spanglechick said:nice.
alternatively, why restrict a section of our society (children) from any environment unless it is, by nature dangerous or sexualised/violent? It's almost a cliche to point to southern europe, but in absence of a pub culture they have family friendly venues for drinking and socialising late into the night, children included.
Most of Asia, too, or the bits I've seen anyhow. People have no problem with restaurants etc being used as kids playrooms. Often the owners will take it on themselves to help keep the kids amused, too. The waiter will be getting them some sweets etc. We're really shit in comparison.nice.
alternatively, why restrict a section of our society (children) from any environment unless it is, by nature dangerous or sexualised/violent? It's almost a cliche to point to southern europe, but in absence of a pub culture they have family friendly venues for drinking and socialising late into the night, children included.
I'm not sure children being in late night drinking venues is something to aspire to.
but you're behaving as if children are annoying ringtones. children are an unavoidable stage of being a person. like we all are. we were all babies once, and we cried. what gives us the position of judgement to disapprove when another person is going through that unavoidable stage?I'm not sure children being in late night drinking venues is something to aspire to.
But even then, my point wasn't that kids shouldn't be in pubs (I've spent the afternoon there with my two), but rather that parents should show some consideration for others: if they cannot behave in a way that doesn't spoil others' enjoyment, don't take them. It's the sense of entitlement that irritates me; the idea that parents who have chosen to have children are entitled to impose their noise on others.
Thora said:There are loads of child free places though! If I go pretty much anywhere after 8pm I can 99% guarantee I won't see anyone younger than 12. I take my kid to places lateish (up to about 9pm) and he is normally the only child there.
Thora said:As far as I am aware, children are human beings as well so no reason why they shouldn't be "imposed" on the rest of society
I'm been imposed upon waaaay more often by drunks/men in pubs than by noisy children.It's about the imposition caused by the inappropriateness of children's behaviour in an environment which most people would reasonably expect to be an adult one.
It's about the imposition caused by the inappropriateness of children's behaviour in an environment which most people would reasonably expect to be an adult one.
butchersapron said:All value judgement's that are based on circular assumptions.
spanglechick said:but you're behaving as if children are annoying ringtones. children are an unavoidable stage of being a person. like we all are. we were all babies once, and we cried. what gives us the position of judgement to disapprove when another person is going through that unavoidable stage?
and why isn't it something to aspire to? having kids in licensed cafes etc in the evenings? perhaps if you grow up around people making alcohol and socialising a normal part of family life, they're less likely to see boozing as big and clever, adult stuff and go fucking mental on it in their teens.
The contrary position isn't about excluding a section of society on the basis of a "most people" argument that you only seem to share with William.Yes. But so is the contrary position.
They might be value judgements, but i can't see how they're based on circular argument or assumption.Yes. But so is the contrary position.
cesare said:The contrary position isn't about excluding a section of society on the basis of a "most people" argument that you only seem to share with William.
butchersapron said:They might be value judgements, but i can't see how they're based on circular argument or assumption.
It's about the imposition caused by the inappropriateness of children's behaviour in an environment which *most people* would reasonably expect to be an adult one.
This wasn't the evening though, it was during the day.It's not on the basis of 'most people.' It's in the basis of imposing on others. And I haven't called for the exclusion of all kids, or even of noisy kids. All I've suggested is that parents ought to be a little more considerate, and not allow their kids to ruin other people's evenings.
Thora said:This wasn't the evening though, it was during the day.
I honestly cannot think of a single occasion where an evening out has been ruined by children.
Unlucky. How often has an evening out been ruined by adults?I can.