The39thStep
Urban critical thinker
Very weird line up.Anyone? Anyway, here's another union-y thing people might want to go to, applications close this week:
New Organising Conference | Ella Baker School
www.ellabakerorganising.org.uk
Very weird line up.Anyone? Anyway, here's another union-y thing people might want to go to, applications close this week:
New Organising Conference | Ella Baker School
www.ellabakerorganising.org.uk
not sure i want to listen to kevin courtney about how to organise to win after they jist capitulated to the govt and sold out educators.Very weird line up.
Did anyone go to this? Would be keen to hear people's thoughts.
Very weird line up.
I'm curious, particularly as it overlaps with the TUC Congress, also in Liverpool, but honestly not sure I'll get my head in gear in time to actually make a decision and make arrangements.Anyone? Anyway, here's another union-y thing people might want to go to, applications close this week:
New Organising Conference | Ella Baker School
www.ellabakerorganising.org.uk
Cheers, will be interested to see that. I was going to not go because it looked like I was going to be called on to spend my weekend doing urgent-but-dull admin stuff to keep my own branch running, but then that didn't need to happen in the end. Sounds worthwhile though, will be keen to read any write-ups.Planned to but rail strike and laziness fucked my plans. A few people I do stuff with went, will stick any write-up they do here hitmouse. Notes from Below are having a bit of a re-think/strategy thing about their activity as well, will post details up sometime if possible.
Yeah, don't think I'll bother going either, just seemed worth posting in case anyone was interested.I'm curious, particularly as it overlaps with the TUC Congress, also in Liverpool, but honestly not sure I'll get my head in gear in time to actually make a decision and make arrangements.
did she sign up before or after the names were announced / the process started ? as if after then AFAIK the union can only offer limited representationI am annoyed. A new joiner who signed up because her job was at risk availed herself fully of union support, got a new job then promptly resigned.
This is why I am adamant we won’t go to the wire for the deathbed conversions, as I like to call them.
After. I do help the deathbed conversions as much as I can but we’re definitely not going to the wire for them.did she sign up before or after the names were announced / the process started ? as if after then AFAIK the union can only offer limited representation
absolutely , and depending on the union;s constitution and /or the recognition agreements there is only so much you can do OfficiallyAfter. I do help the deathbed conversions as much as I can but we’re definitely not going to the wire for them.
repping in meetings/ hearing even if you confine yourself to ' as a colleague' level of interventions usually isn't a problem it's when the 'deathbed convertee' wants you to mobilise the full regional / national / actual Legal resources that it's a big fat ''neggers cheggers' moment ...Yeah, it's one we come up against a fair bit, know of a couple of specific situations recently. And I do mean "against", because I think for a lot of us it's definitely one of those where our different principles are put in opposition to each other.
Aye, somewhat similar at our place. We've done well on recruiting in recent years, less so on organising or developing activist members.Thanks for the report. In my own workplace the ‘rank and file’ tend to be massively individualist only supporting the collectivist union approach when it suits. Heaven forbid there be an overtime ban or filling vacancies which reduces that prospect.
As mentioned by LDC elsewhere, here's a report from the Troublemakers conference:
Notes from the Troublemakers’ conference in the UK – The problem with the rank-and-file - Angry Workers
After the first phase of the so-called strike wave the primary question is whether the strikes gave birth to new initiatives of self-organisaton amongst participating workers. This is difficult to assess. What we can see are various initiatives within the broad left to organise ‘rank-and-file’...www.angryworkers.org
When I went and looked into it, I was actually one of the people affected, and I'd sent the support desk an email saying something like "oh, you seem to have changed my email address from my work to my personal email, can you change it back", I didn't think to add "also is this a massive issue affecting hundreds/thousands of people that you're aware of but haven't bothered telling branches about?" Anyway, if the relevant person does a report for all movements between August 11th-13th, that should give a list of the relevant emails.Fuck, now did I or did I not hear about this at the time?
Definitely feel like there was some situation we were getting a significant number of members telling us they weren't receiving messages, but that actually might have been before August, so maybe a different thing.
I don't have access to WARMs meself, but will def ask someone who does to take a look, cheers
The implications of the TUPE legislation which I think date back to 1979 would seem to be massive if I understand them at all.One might think that they are one of the most important pieces of employment protection on the statute book and yet I for one rarely hear them referred to in the media at all.Thought about this because there is a re- tendering process going on where I work.I work for the client of a transport company that has suddenly gone under and no-one has a scooby whether all the drivers will be transferred with the contract -and thus be in on Monday albeit with a different employer(new holders of the contract) or whether they are gone for good?