They aren't offensive views, they just happen to be different from yours. Big, big difference.
It's also possible to reply without strings of profanity. When all people can do is swear and throw personal insults as a response, it shows they've run out of intelligent responses.
Assuming, of course, they had any in the first place.
i tend to fidn that peopel who obsess over the venacular rather than the point of the conversation tend to be short sighted and incapable of logical discussion because their dogmatic belief system be it religion or secular morals predetermines their viewpoint.
swearing is bad/wrong/imorral so the point being made is invaild becuase it to is bad/wrong/immoral.
it's this flawed logic which makes fundemenalists of all flavours impossible to deal with...
there's no such thing as swear words unless you also support a class system. swear words or vulgar language was derivied from the class seperation which had those in the upper classes seeking to dissaccocated themselves from other classes by attempts to control words in common venacular. This comes from the overtly xtain base of swear words, citing the though shall not swear from the bible to give siginifcant dogmatic gravitas to the subject.
however it's a direct misquote and a misinterpreatation of the idea of swearing: I swear on the grave of my father, by my eyes etc. not sexually refferenceable or suggestable wordings.
ergo any one who attempts to prevent the use of common vencaular when in discussion is attempting to introduce a class dynamic to the disscussion by way of supressing dessenting viewpoints to their own.
i reject wholley your notions of class based prejudices and state clearly this isn't an acceptable line of deabte. period.
those who wish to express themselves do so on their level not on your subjgated demanded or even wished level.
as any adult knows you cannot dictate the terms of one persons social interaction with you any more than you can limit what they say. Adults tend to let that which they find minor to wash over them as letting things which are not really important slide is frankly also an exculsive of adult conversation.
common venacular is in this catigory.....
every time.
as for the acutal viewpoint epspouse if you can think of something ore offensive to humanities longeigty than bringin and unloved unwanted uneeded and potentially short lived person into the world whilst at the same time denying the rights of the one section of our society who are able to give life force to humanity as though it were a descion of property or ownership is someone far to unevolved to be allowed to maintain their stance without challenge.
that's offensive. you would summarly hold women hostage and force them to submit to your will in order to allow your beliefs to proper...
take a long hard look in the mirror, then you will be eye to eye with the subject of that which causes you greatest offense and ironically that which causes the greatest offence to your larger sperices....
pro lifers are always unevolved mentally, emotionally, physically and should for the sake of all humanity be wiped permently off the face of the world for praciticing their control fantasies out on others...