Indeed - just saw a trans woman posting about how her (cis) sister got targetted by transphobes for being 6ft 3. The poster herself at 6ft is shorter than her cis sisters because she comes from a tall family. I've seen film of literally a very feminine looking woman but with cropped hair wearing sportswear was questioned by some busybody in the loos.Already happened, butch women have been stopped from using women's toilets and transvestigators are a thing. I'm dreading the TERF reaction to Christiane Endler, because she's cis but you just know some of them will assume she's trans because she's over 6ft.
I don’t know if that's a reference to my posts but in case of any misunderstanding, I’m not accusing you of having insufficient compassion. In fact I wouldn’t have made those posts had I believed that to be the case.in this debate you're not expressing the views that lead people to be accused of bigotry or insufficient compassion.
Copping out and self defeating ness? They overlap.What equivalence, if any, do you draw between the two different phenomena?
Smokedout, you've articulated it better than I could. Glinner almost never talks about abortion, equal pay, femicide, FGM, I'd bet he won't be talking about this horrible new AI beauty contest either, and on the rare occasions he does, it always comes back to trans people. Embery and Walsh are even worse - isn't Embery one of those 'women are happier being homemakers and raising kids' red/brown types? I bet if England women had lost the Euro final, Embery would have gone on about how women's football is woke lefty nonsense that nobody cares about. (I read the report on the BBC of Everton v Brighton a few days ago and it was depressing how many comments had been deleted, and I can guess why)
Quite oddly, many will also speak up in support of a separatist form of feminism which says all men are rapists. I suppose it helps them to think they are still being radical.I think it's also notable how many cis men relish a form of feminism and that is not critical of them in any way and gives them a justification to dismiss and talk over women who disagree with them, police the borders of masculinity and tell people they consider women (trans men and afab non binary people) what they should be permitted to do with their bodies.
Thanks, I appreciate that.I'm very sorry to hear that, and it's not something I'd wish on anyone.
Jesus, a quick google make him look completely insane (and, this, an Institute of StupidIdeas lecturer)And bang on time the fucking transphobes are citing Cass as they attempt to get Pride and Pride related events stopped in Manchester because they're a "super spreader event for gender theory, queer theory and the profoundly damaging activities of the LGBT cult".
Being shared by noted headcase Claire Fox.
View attachment 421225
Yes this is insane, but looks at how dead eyed transphobia and Cass are combining to go after the entire LGBT community now by pathologising trans identity, allowing this quasi pandemic language to be aimed at the community.
I had withdrawn from these debates for a long time. It’s only recently that I came to the realisation that doing so was a cop out and self defeating.
Oh, there are definitely men who think that, and that men need women to tame their wilder urges. And that they need to protect 'their' women from threats.Quite oddly, many will also speak up in support of a separatist form of feminism which says all men are rapists. I suppose it helps them to think they are still being radical.
Suicide and self-harm rates are absolutely horrific in women's prisons. Good luck getting JK Rowling to care about that though.Cis women in prison apparently aren't worth caring about at the moment - they don't seem to matter until HEADLINES about trans women being sent to jail reappear.
Never mind actual abuse that women experience in prison. Never mind that a massively disproportionate amount of those women have mental health issues, are from disadvantaged backgrounds, and have experienced domestic abuse. Never mind the lack of support for them. All that can be ignored. Because women's rights or something.
the ironic thing is the best 'social engineering' tool for access to something like toilets or a semi secure area of any premises is a pair of overalls, a clipboard and toolbox , second best is a police uniform ...It's like the obsession with toilets. Signs are not barriers. A rapist doesn't need to dress up as a woman to rape.
Re abortion, I remember people asking why the hell JKR wasn't commenting on Roe vs Wade being overturned and the reply was 'she's not American, it doesn't affect her'. Well, she's not American or a swimmer but it didn't stop her commenting on Lia Thomas, despite Thomas not affecting her either. And I'd argue Roe vs Wade being overturned was far worse for women than the things JKR gets upset about, but of course TERFs blamed trans people and allies for abortion being overturned because either they weren't focusing enough on protecting it, or Roe vs Wade was overturned because the right were just that fed up of trans people.
which is where the Politicla Lesbian movement comes from, women who aren;t lesbians because they are sexually and romantically atteacted to other femme aligned people but becasue they want to punish menQuite oddly, many will also speak up in support of a separatist form of feminism which says all men are rapists. I suppose it helps them to think they are still being radical.
which is where the Politicla Lesbian movement comes from, women who aren;t lesbians because they are sexually and romantically atteacted to other femme aligned people but becasue they want to punish men
I think this really reveals that fairness is not the real motivation for rigidly segregating sport by sex. If being tall really is an advantage in snooker then surely the fair thing to do would be to segregate by err .. height.And the physical strength argument falls down when it comes to snooker, not to mention that snooker has mixed tournaments. Arm length doesn't matter because you can use a cue extender. But you still get people calling for trans snooker players to be banned.
It's very difficult to read this as anything other than criticism of people being bothered about women's sport:
We are discussing the sport issue right now so it might be nice to hear santinos thoughts on the matter (or those who he represents?). Will you be clear Santino if any comments are your thoughts Vs represented thoughts? Or do the two align?0/10
Come on mate, seriously. Have some pride in your work at least.