Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Tout exposed Mark 'Stone/Kennedy' exposed as undercover police officer

cover1.jpg
 
Police facing call to publish list of their undercover spies


...

Police have admitted that at least 460 political groups have been infiltrated since 1968, but have not made public a list.

The letter from the 133 individuals points out that there are “hundreds of organisations who still have no idea that they were spied upon. This means the overwhelming majority of individuals and organisations targeted since 1968 have had no opportunity to consider the possible consequences of the actions of undercover officers on their work and cannot currently participate as witnesses.”


34 Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army

Dangerous folk, not.
 
The seditious bastards :mad:

well if you advertise a huge demo and then arnt prepared to talk to the police.
the police do have a duty to keep the roads open your right to protest doesnt mean you have a right to do what the fuck you like and sod everyone else
 
well if you advertise a huge demo and then arnt prepared to talk to the police.
the police do have a duty to keep the roads open your right to protest doesnt mean you have a right to do what the fuck you like and sod everyone else

Read the thread. The police have been using unconscionable tactics to sabotage peaceful protest movments in this country for decades. Nobody has a right to be trusted when they repeatedly violate both trust and basic decency.
 
Read the thread. The police have been using unconscionable tactics to sabotage peaceful protest movments in this country for decades. Nobody has a right to be trusted when they repeatedly violate both trust and basic decency.


which is completely unacceptable.
So is wanting to hold a demo on public roads and not inform anyone of what your planning its a dim tactic.
 
which is completely unacceptable.
So is wanting to hold a demo on public roads and not inform anyone of what your planning its a dim tactic.

The situation you described was a publically advertised mass demonstration, so surely you're telling everyone what you're planning?

Which is different from asking for permission of course. Even if the police had some notional right to grant or withold permission for people to engage in lawful activity, they would have long since forfeited it by virtue of their own despicable behaviour.
 
Last edited:
which is completely unacceptable.
So is wanting to hold a demo on public roads and not inform anyone of what your planning its a dim tactic.

So the potential for some temporary, minor disruption to traffic is comparable to the most extreme level possible of state backed violation of people's privacy?

201121181825754633_20.jpg

This lot didn't ask police permission for their demo - completely unacceptable!
 
ANY fucker got up in clown gear - the creepiest fucking "fancy dress" in existence - doesn't deserve sympathy, they deserve a shoeing!!! :mad:
You get the full horror of the Clown Army throughout that video. But there's a bit at 2:30 where they go into a 'huddle' to have a discussion about whether they should carry on talking to the coppers in high pitched voices or not. :eek: The fucking state of 'em!
 
The situation you described was a publically advertised mass demonstration, so surely you're telling everyone what you're planning?

Which is different from asking for permission of course. Even if the police had some notional right to grant or withold permission for people to engage in lawful activity, they would have long since forfeited it.

because chucking paint all over an Army surplus store:facepalm: is completely lawful:hmm:
 
A few of those organisations might have raised legit concerns smash edo was into throwing stones and not cooperating with the police for example

At the time that Smash EDO was infiltrated by 'Marco Jacobs'- for over a year, there had been no 'mass demos'.

What there had been was an attempt to gain an injunction under the Protection from Harassment that made protesting outside the factory illegal. The police advised the arms manufacturer to seek such an injunction after they had been used successfully to crack down on animal rights protesters. Information gained by the undercover was probably channelled to the offices of Timothy Lawson Cruttenden, the solicitor who made millions out of the PHA injunctions and enjoyed a very close relationship with NETCU.
 
Apples and oranges by the sound of it

No. So, what does 'peaceful protest movement' mean? Do you actually mean non-violent? Is that how they would have described themselves ideologically or strategically (because that wasn't the case for many of them), or are you just describing them as that for some other reason?

And, as well as that being not true for some of the groups infiltrated, it does tend to suggest that it might be OK for the cops to do it to groups that were violent or whose actions resulted in some violence. Classic 'good' protester, 'bad' protester rubbish.

One of the depressing things for me about this whole saga is the amount of 'radicals' who seems to have got a bit confused about the role of the cops and their infiltration and have often ended up towing some odd liberal-type line about how it was a subversion of democracy and just not needed as all the groups were really well-meaning and lovely actually...
 
That BBC play was shit of course. And don't even get me started on the fucking clowns...
 
Is that a badge of pride or of shame if your group is not on the list?
it seems they were spying on tuck shops and the WI by this point so I'd say shame. I mean you could put it down to organizational discipline and a keen nose for these wronguns. That would be the comforting lie I told myself rather than being ranked under the clown insurgency as a threat to her majesties gov
 
Back
Top Bottom