Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Only it's a summary
Only it's a summary
Summary + full hereOnly it's a summary
Yes that's what I figured. I'm struggling to imagine the judge being overly sympathetic given the above.None of the reports mention costs, but lots have this line 'A hearing will follow Thursday’s judgment to consider the consequences of the ruling', maybe that's when costs will be considered.
Not sure. Can he declare himself bankrupt?So what happens now? If Y-L doesn't pay, does the plaintiff have to enforce the judgement, or is it just a straight contempt of court?
Just be grateful I posted the summary up eh?Only it's a summary
Think he had already done so or at least said he was . House isn’t in his name etc . Just have to wait for his response, not sure if there is an appeal process or if there is how he’d fund itNot sure. Can he declare himself bankrupt?
Or ramp up the 'commercial' side of his hobby.He'll have to knock his coke habit on the head
Can he appeal if he's been made bankrupt? I'd thought not.Think he had already done so or at least said he was . House isn’t in his name etc . Just have to wait for his response, not sure if there is an appeal process or if there is how he’d fund it
I don't particularly mind if a bunch of racists have to scrape money together to give it to a brown person. In fact, I hope that their noses are regularly rubbed in it.The Telegram grift has already started. The problem with this grift is his supporters will be giving money to a Syrian refugee
View attachment 279982
Anti-Islam activist Tommy Robinson has lost a High Court libel case brought by a Syrian schoolboy.
Jamal Hijazi was filmed being attacked in the playground at Almondbury School in Huddersfield in October 2018.
The English Defence League founder, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, claimed Mr Hijazi attacked "young English girls".
Mr Justice Nicklin ruled in Mr Hijazi's favour and granted him £100,000 in damages.
Shortly after the video of the incident went viral, Mr Robinson claimed in two Facebook videos that the teenager was "not innocent and he violently attacks young English girls in his school".
In the clips viewed by nearly one million people, the 38-year-old also claimed Jamal "beat a girl black and blue" and "threatened to stab" another boy at his school, allegations the teenager denies.
God knows however there may be two questions or more . Is their a legal right to appeal the decision and secondly does that route require means beyond what he has .Can he appeal if he's been made bankrupt? I'd thought not.
God knows however there may be two questions or more . Is their a legal right to appeal the decision and secondly does that route require means beyond what he has .
I imagine that this means that for the next quite a few years, Yaxley-Lemon and his financial affairs are going to be very much under scrutiny.Some good clarifications rubbershoes nice one.
Bit of a charade if he can wriggle out of it but the judgement is clear. Obviously I would like the lot paid in full...
Quite. If he is constantly successfully begging for money but remains bankrupt then questions will be asked you'd think.I imagine that this means that for the next quite a few years, Yaxley-Lemon and his financial affairs are going to be very much under scrutiny.
I wonder what happens if he continues to perpetrate libels to take advantage of the fact that he's effectively "judgement proof"?
The English Defence League founder, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, claimed Mr Hijazi attacked "young English girls".
Mr Justice Nicklin ruled in Mr Hijazi's favour and granted him £100,000 in damages.
He was also ordered to pay legal costs which the BBC understands amount to about £500,000.
The final figures will be agreed and submitted to the High Court as part of forthcoming hearings to establish his means and assets.
Are we breaking bbc links now?Update from the BBC, could be £500k in costs.
There's going to be some sort of special judicial hearing to find out what assets he may have hidden.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-57930901
Fuck him but that's gross isn't it? Justice at a hefty price.Estimate of costs in that BBC item...£500k
Of course, this presumably works the other way around.If has good advice, there is no reason for him to ever hold any assets in his name again. He can continue this civil action performances for as long as he wants.he’s a twat but not thick. Why bother suing if you have to pay your own costs. Nice little paradigm going on there
Not in this caseFuck him but that's gross isn't it? Justice at a hefty price.
Most of the country and a lot of lawyersWhere did the kid get the money to start suing in the first place from? Was there someone with deep pockets and a strong enough dislike of Tommy willing to stake half a million on it?
From the BBC reportWhere did the kid get the money to start suing in the first place from? Was there someone with deep pockets and a strong enough dislike of Tommy willing to stake half a million on it?
Jamal Hijazi's lawyers welcomed the judgement and praised Mr Hijazi's "courage" in pursuing the claim. Francesca Flood, from Burlingtons Legal, said: "Jamal and his family now wish to put this matter behind them in order that they can get on with their lives. They do, however, wish to extend their gratitude to the Great British public for their support and generosity, without which this legal action would not have been possible."