The Tuts make dubious allegations after Brixton Windmill gig

[George & Bill]

I don't think there's loads of people on here disbelieving the story. I think it's more a case of not judging until they've heard the full story, as Twitter is known for not exactly being the best source of accurate information until stories have been backed up somewhere else

This is just after Blagsta called Nadia an arsehole.

 

[Blagsta]

This is just after you've called her an arsehole.

You owe me an apology.

 

[George & Bill]

You owe me an apology.

Oh please do explain!

 

[Minnie_the_Minx]

This is just after you've called her an arsehole.

I don't remember that post. Are you sure I wasn't calling Seamus an arsehole?

 

[Blagsta]

Oh please do explain!

I've explained. Now you fucking explain your shit slinging.

 

[George & Bill]

So, Minnie didn't think on p.2 that there were loads of people disbelieving the story, she just thought people were waiting for a clear picture to emerge. But as you've just stated unequivocally, you already did disbelieve the story by then. I don't think that reflects at all well on you.

 

[Minnie_the_Minx]

I've just done a search of my posts on this thread for "arsehole" and there's no results so it doesn't look like I called anyone an arsehole publicly although I might think it privately, or have you been reading my mind?

 

[George & Bill]

I don't remember that post. Are you sure I wasn't calling Seamus an arsehole?

You weren't calling anyone one - Blagsta was calling Nadia one.

 

[Minnie_the_Minx]

So, Minnie didn't think on p.2 that there were loads of people disbelieving the story, she just thought people were waiting for a clear picture to emerge. But as you've just stated unequivocally, you already did disbelieve the story by then. I don't think that reflects at all well on you.

No, I was looking at both sides of the story and believe me, I certainly would NOT be defending the landlord if he had said it. I still don't see where I called her an arsehole

 

[Minnie_the_Minx]

You weren't calling anyone one - Blagsta was calling Nadia one.

Post No. 1051 gives the impression I did. Maybe you need to amend that particular post

 

[George & Bill]

I've just done a search of my posts on this thread for "arsehole" and there's no results so it doesn't look like I called anyone an arsehole publicly although I might think it privately, or have you been reading my mind?

Minnie, what I'm saying is that on p.2 you, like most people, were saying it was impossible to know at that point who to believe. But Blagsta went ahead and said simply that Nadia sounded like an arsehole, and has said just a few posts ago that it was already clear to him by that point that it was nothing more than someone kicking up shit over being legitimately chucked out. I was quoting you to show that this was by no means the consensus.

 

[Citizen66]

Is slowjoe a sock puppet?

 

[Blagsta]

Is slowjoe a sock puppet?

he's very rude, whatever else he is

 

[George & Bill]

Post No. 1051 gives the impression I did. Maybe you need to amend that particular post

Apologies, now done.

 

[Blagsta]

Apologies, now done.

You owe me an apology.

 

[George & Bill]

No, I was looking at both sides of the story and believe me, I certainly would NOT be defending the landlord if he had said it. I still don't see where I called her an arsehole

Sorry, my bad again - most people at that stage were keeping an open mind; in contrast, Blagsta had already made up his mind. Why that should be, only he knows.

 

[Minnie_the_Minx]

Minnie, what I'm saying is that on p.2 you, like most people, were saying it was impossible to know at that point who to believe. But Blagsta went ahead and said simply that Nadia sounded like an arsehole, and has said just a few posts ago that it was already clear to him by that point that it was nothing more than someone kicking up shit over being legitimately chucked out. I was quoting you to show that this was by no means the consensus.

Right ok, but because the post is at the top of the page, if someone's not read the previous page, it does give the impression it was me that said it. Not to worry, as I don't give a shit about Nadia or the landlord anyway.

 

[George & Bill]

You owe me an apology.

Why? Because I've called you on the way you dismissed a story of a woman being assaulted when others still felt the case was open?

 

[Blagsta]

Sorry, my bad again - most people at that stage were keeping an open mind; in contrast, Blagsta had already made up his mind. Why that should be, only he knows.

You owe me an apology.

 

[George & Bill]

Right ok, but because the post is at the top of the page, if someone's not read the previous page, it does give the impression it was me that said it. Not to worry, as I don't give a shit anyway.

Yep, sorry, I've amended that now.

 

[Blagsta]

Why? Because I've called you on the way you dismissed a story of a woman being assaulted when others still felt the case was open?

I was right. You owe me an apology.

 

[George & Bill]

I was right. You owe me an apology.

Well, it was 50/50, others said it was too early to call, and you took a punt - the most obvious reason for the punt you took is misogyny, but it could be something else. But it still doesn't look good.

We might have to leave this that I'm rude, and you're a broken, possibly slightly misogynistic record.

 

[Blagsta]

Well, it was 50/50, others said it was too early to call, and you took a punt - the most obvious reason for the punt you took is misogyny, but it could be something else. But it still doesn't look good.

We might have to leave this that I'm rude, and you're a broken, possibly slightly misogynistic record.

You're bang out of order. I had reasons for saying what I said and I was right. Whereas you just want to have a pop. Fuck off.

 

[Blagsta]

.

 

[George & Bill]

If you'd given your reasons on page 2, you might not have come across as badly as you did.

I've made my point, and unless you have anything further to add ('you owe me an apology' again, maybe?), I'll leave you to learn from, or remain oblivious to your mistake, as you choose.

 

[Onket]

lol

 

[Minnie_the_Minx]

('you owe me an apology' again, maybe?)

You're really pushing it now slowjoe

 

[Blagsta]

If you'd given your reasons on page 2, you might not have come across as badly as you did.

I've made my point, and unless you have anything further to add ('you owe me an apology' again, maybe?), I'll leave you to learn from, or remain oblivious to your mistake, as you choose.

The reasons are there. Shall I quote them, seeing as you appear to have lost whatever literacy skills you once had, in favour of slinging shit around like a coward?

apparently the landlord was unhappy with the singer of the Tuts bringing her own alcohol in and drinking it onstage

hroughout The Tuts set Nadia, from the band, had clearly had a lot to drink, she offered members of the audience a sip of her vodka Smirnoff bottle and,most hilariously, asked one my friends his ethnic origin to which her response was “nice”. At this point nothing happened, the vodka remained on the stage and the band continued their set.

Whilst our backs were turned Seamus had gone up to Nadia and began shouting at her due to her consuming alcohol which she had not brought at the venue

Now seeing that, plus the comments on The Tuts own Facebook page (which they have subsequently removed) about how trouble follows them around at gigs, how they enjoy fighting at gigs and how they should have "shanked" Seamus, plus knowing The Windmill pub well, I drew a conclusion - which was correct.

Now you, a week later, fling accusations of me being misogynistic around.



You owe me a big apology.

 

[killer b]

tbf, it was obvious on p2 that she was an arsehole. p1 even.

 

[George & Bill]

You're really pushing it now slowjoe

don't see that myself...