Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Tuts make dubious allegations after Brixton Windmill gig

Status
Not open for further replies.
editor said:
Maybe you should tweet them back and tell them to read this thread?

I did sort of test a reaction:

@MagicTina @WindmillBrixton I would look at the whole story (both sides) first. Then again I was not there. Were you?

Reply:

@MagicTina @Badgers_Musing What is the other side? That he had a really good reason to attack a girl and call her a "paki"?! @WindmillBrixton
 
You mean sexist weirdo, clearly

I really don't think she has any right to be labelling me as a sexist tbf...

lq5br.jpg
 
'Holroyd-Doveton' :facepalm:

D-B surname is no longer necessarily a sign of being a posho, to be fair. It could alternatively mean that her parents combined their surnames when they married, or that they never married but that she took both their surnames.
She looks a bit twatty, though, although that's not necessarily a sign of poshness either. ;)
 
Blagsta said:
That's not an entirely fair thing to take the piss out of. My kids have a double barreled surname cos me and my partner aren't married. Doesn't mean we're posh!

Yes (and sexist)
 
I've come across triple-barrelled in definitely not at all posh.
i DO realise that and have come across plenty of non poshos with crazy high faluting names
if myself and current partner out our names together it would poshify me by a few 1000% :oops:
 
free spirit said:
I thought you were making the point that he'd somehow be better off if the police did arrest him as he'd then have the opportunity to prove himself innocent.

If you weren't making that point, then I apologise for thinking you were, and please ignore my response.

If you were, then your point is wrong for the reasons stated. Everyone in the scene would know about him being arrested, as this would be gossip that would spread like wildfire, but only a small percentage of those people would then be aware at a later point if he'd been acquitted as this wouldn't attract anything like the attention of the initial arrest. Unless he owned the venue, he'd also quite likely be suspended pending the results of the police action, which would also be picked up on as an indication of his guilt.

Sorry, but I don't agree with trial by rumour and letting someone have the opportunity to defend themselves (whilst presumption of innocence is in effect) is a far preferable scenario imo. I think it's quite telling that they are refusing to go down that avenue actually.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom