Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Trump presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.
This bit though is also in there:
"When you include people who didn't vote in 2016, Clinton comes out ahead in the do-over, 41 percent to 37 percent. (Johnson and Stein are still at 5 and 3 percent, respectively.) So some nonvoters appear to wish they hadn't sat the last election out."
So if it was run again tomorrow (not the primaries the election) Clinton would be the winner, right?
 
This bit though is also in there:
"When you include people who didn't vote in 2016, Clinton comes out ahead in the do-over, 41 percent to 37 percent. (Johnson and Stein are still at 5 and 3 percent, respectively.) So some nonvoters appear to wish they hadn't sat the last election out."
So if it was run again tomorrow (not the primaries the election) Clinton would be the winner, right?

Depends on whether they would actually vote this time and where they live.
 
Meanwhile . . .

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday the U.N. Security Council must be prepared to impose new sanctions on North Korea as concerns mount that it may test a sixth nuclear bomb as early as Tuesday.

"This is a real threat to the world, whether we want to talk about it or not. North Korea is a big world problem and it's a problem that we have to finally solve," he said. “People put blindfolds on for decades and now it’s time to solve the problem.”

Entire U.S. Senate to go to White House for North Korea briefing

All 100 senators have been asked to the White House for the briefing by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the aides said.

While top administration officials routinely travel to Capitol Hill to address members of Congress on foreign policy and national security matters, it is unusual for the entire 100-member Senate to go to such an event at the White House, and for those four top officials to be involved.



upload_2017-4-24_22-3-50.png
upload_2017-4-24_22-4-37.png

upload_2017-4-24_22-5-24.png

Linky for those who tweet.

(Edited to include 2nd article - somehow missed that out.)
 
Last edited:
Next up Buzzfeed's 10 worst West Virginia coal miner healthcare fails! Thwy are getting what they deserve Lol!

At least It would be relative to the thread, unlike the whataboutry re;Clinton and Sanders. Buggerinel, even TTT hardly mentions them anymore.
 
Meanwhile . . .

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday the U.N. Security Council must be prepared to impose new sanctions on North Korea as concerns mount that it may test a sixth nuclear bomb as early as Tuesday.

"This is a real threat to the world, whether we want to talk about it or not. North Korea is a big world problem and it's a problem that we have to finally solve," he said. “People put blindfolds on for decades and now it’s time to solve the problem.”

Entire U.S. Senate to go to White House for North Korea briefing

All 100 senators have been asked to the White House for the briefing by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the aides said.

While top administration officials routinely travel to Capitol Hill to address members of Congress on foreign policy and national security matters, it is unusual for the entire 100-member Senate to go to such an event at the White House, and for those four top officials to be involved.



View attachment 105178
View attachment 105179

View attachment 105180

Linky for those who tweet.

(Edited to include 2nd article - somehow missed that out.)

"Hmmmm, I got a moderate rise in my polls for a few tomahawks on Syria, what kinda rise would I get for a full nuclear strike on NK, what you reckon Steve?
"Good move Mr President, your base will love you, go for it"
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
IMG_20170425_080201.JPG

But there's evidence of Republican legislators thwarting the investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 US elections at every turn. Curious, too, there are only 7 part time staff working on the Senate Intelligence Committee investigating this. There were 46 working on the 2014 House Select Committee investigation of the Benghazi attack, and likewise many more for previous probes. :hmm:

Gosh, you'd almost thing those sitting GOP legislators are worried the investigation might find something damaging to them and the Administration. :mad:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170425_080201.JPG
    IMG_20170425_080201.JPG
    132.9 KB · Views: 3
That's very weird. Is there any reason to think he's right that sanders fans saw him as a sort of totem non-evil jew?
This is from a fucking Irish-American catholic who lays great emphasis altogether on Sanders' Jewish roots. What do you fucking think? And what do you think his real motive is? And as for blocking with the fukcing libertarians (liberty for those who have the money to pay for it), he must think people are stupid.
 
To be honest I don't follow what his real motive is. Apart from 'to abolish the white race'. The whole article just seems totally bizarre to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
Judging by his pimping of pro-assad black nationalist-stalinist Bruce Dixon and BAR (who i had a lot of respect for before 2011/2), i think he's heavily into abolishing people full stop.
 
To be honest I don't follow what his real motive is. Apart from 'to abolish the white race'. The whole article just seems totally bizarre to me.
It's an exercise in narcissism, typical USAnian "look at me" guff. I don't think I should reply to the person who sent me that link.
 
It's an exercise in narcissism, typical USAnian "look at me" guff. I don't think I should reply to the person who sent me that link.
I think you should reply, or banish them from your life forever. It's a really nasty shitty article, gets worse on second reading.
 
It's an exercise in narcissism, typical USAnian "look at me" guff. I don't think I should reply to the person who sent me that link.
It's overly long and rambling so hard to take much of anything from it tbh.

There is a good point about many white Americans pointing to their oppressed European ancestors when insisting white supremacy is nowt to do with them. (see Irish Slavery thread here as an example) :rolleyes:

Can't really follow the 'good secular Jew' argument about Sanders though. Is it that left wing folk cling to him as a fig leaf for their antisemitism? I can't figure that out, nor most of the piece, sorry.
 
Is it that left wing folk cling to him as a fig leaf for their antisemitism? I can't figure that out, nor most of the piece, sorry.

Shouldn't you be admiring yourself in the mirror, while wrestling a bald eagle and chewing a hamburger?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom