I don't have much time for Socialist Action (to whom I think Fiona Edwards belongs, although I could be wrong), but when did the main enemy of the radical left/ anarchism stop being at home?
Thought I'd try to give this a proper answer: yes, the main enemy is at home, as it's always been, but there's never really been agreement about what that actually means in practice. I could gesture at Lenin vs Luxemburg here, for instance, even though I think they both would've claimed to agree with that slogan. For me, it means that bearing in mind that our enemy is at home, but also the government of every other state in the world is also the enemy of our friends in those countries, which can be a difficult tension to navigate at times; for some clowns, Socialist Action included, it seems to mean "my enemy is at home, therefore any state that happens to be in opposition to my state is my friend". I don't think the main enemy being at home means that British lefties are/were required to do mental contortions to prove that the UK government was really behind Italy invading Ethiopia in 1935, Germany invading Poland in 1939, or the USSR invading Hungary in 1956, and the same applies here.
The class struggle against our own ruling class continues, of course, at P&O and Chep and JustEat and all the rest of it, but I dunno what "socialist" geopolitical witterings have to contribute to it.
FFS, when your first response to likely war crimes is to shout 'false flag' have a fucking look at yourself.
Honestly finding this whole topic pretty despairing, and very reminiscent of the positions around Syria.
Makes sense, since the military invading Ukraine is the same as carried out a lot of the atrocities in Syria. Or possibly Syria was just about the US attacking the legitimate government of the Syrian people, depending on who you ask.
Yeah, that. I mean I have some sympathies with some of that tbh, but their stuff always seem to be the more antagonistic arsehole end of the spectrum. That stuff does get pushed by similar forces, so maybe it comes from that? Also something about what people get personally from being 'an outcast' or special, and looking for 'communities' defined by being different etc. Like with the Covid denier/anti-vaxxers as well I guess? For some of Galloway's crowd it's performative though in part, some imagined 'prole' position of 'common sense' to go with the hilarious flat caps and Brexit stuff.
Yeah, without wanting to turn this into yet another trans thread I find myself thinking of the recent Nina Power trajectory. I would really, really have liked the pessimists to be wrong about that one.
What are the known significant false flags since Gulf of Tonkin or whatever that was called?
Italy stategy of tension stuff, like the Piazza Fontana bombing? And I suppose spycops stuff as well, like I think you could justifiably call Debenhams 1987 an (alleged) false flag? That's one of the frustrating things, of course states really do shady and dishonest shit, just like there really are nazis in Ukraine and that's an actual problem too, it's just these fucking dickheads make it impossible to have a sensible conversation about the subject.