Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
Looks like twitter have labelled Galloway 'Russian State-affiliated media."
... and manages a tone of big-I-am wankerdom in the process.
Looks like twitter have labelled Galloway 'Russian State-affiliated media."
Looks like twitter have labelled Galloway 'Russian State-affiliated media."
Man's a cunt, obvs...
They've banned better people with more followersIf I ran Twitter, I'd say "request accepted" and change the designation to "Russian state-affiliated cunt."
Aye Putin will be comparing Matt's cancelling against the west's attempts to cancel Russian culture tomorrow. I feel sorry for old JK House-elf. Now she's in league with Putin and Matt Le TissierSince we’re on that football…
Matt Le Tissier has stood down from whatever role he had at Southampton due to his belief they we're being lied to over Ukraine
Matt Le Tissier quits Southampton role after backlash over Ukraine tweet
Matt Le Tissier has stood down from his role as a Southampton ambassador following a backlash over a controversial social media post on the war in Ukrainewww.theguardian.com
pfft, blatant false flag
The Miami Showband massacre.What are the known significant false flags since Gulf of Tonkin or whatever that was called?
Never read the comments, no good will come of itOh God, I read the comments.
Anyway, great PR, Stop the War.
If you go to Parnell square, on the north side you find a memorial to Harris Boyle and Wesley Somerville.The Miami Showband massacre.
Miami Showband massacre: UK government accused of ‘lies’ after £1.5m payout
Survivor of 1975 Northern Ireland attack says he agreed to settle because of plan to halt Troubles prosecutionswww.theguardian.com
Feels fairly likely it's someone from the ex-AFA/RA/IWCA and probably current FLAF milieu? Looking around, it seems like the person who's Class Action on fb is also fairly likely to be the "Celtic Fans Against Fascism"/Class1Action account on twitter: https://twitter.com/class1actionDoes anyone know who's behind the Class Action group on FB? I've just looked on FB for the first time in ages and they popped up -- their stuff is a bit of a mishmash but there's some very dodgy stuff from them on Ukraine.
Wish they could've just stuck to what they were good at, cos when they were good they were really really good.Some of the lot that did the Essex Heckler (among other stuff, they used loads of names and papers) went down the Covid conspiracy rabbithole, and seem to have continued with Ukraine stuff as well.
This should be required reading for anyone involved in Stop the War, and anyone defending them.Article about leftists seeing NATO as the problem here.
There Is No Left Position That Justifies Putin's Attack on Ukraine | Common Dreams
"If we want to support the right of self-determination to America’s neighbors, we can’t deny the same to Russia’s. If we’re not able to recognize multiple imperialisms, we are guilty of the same kind of Americocentrism for which we castigate others."www.commondreams.org
Imho crack smoking is a behaviour which (whilst driven by social/economic inequality) does require personal responsibility to address and also makes people believe a lot of crap, so the metaphor feels appropriate.
Wasn’t keen on (kebabkinhgs?) comment about oxygen deprivation at birth on another thread, but there are worse things happening in the world.
In any case, the reason Galloway (and quite a few others) have spent so long honing their loonshpiel is likely less to do with a drug use and/or organic mental impairment, but because they know it’s effective at grooming those who are a bit (or a lot) vulnerable. Same reason Nigel does it.
Well it isn't a short read but I'd say a bit before halfway down, he's saying about Putin having seen Ukraine as Russian and denying its autonomy. I definitely agree with him about not cheerleading for NATO, but that Putin is his own agent. Oh I'll quote the bit I found most relevant. In my opnion this is where it gets to the nitty gritty:That may be your opinion!
I'll give it another read though, which points should I be looking at?
Don't 100% agree with your assesements, however points you bring up are very important in understanding the situation and how the conflict with Russian military intervention came about!Interesting point onWell it isn't a short read but I'd say a bit before halfway down, he's saying about Putin having seen Ukraine as Russian and denying its autonomy. I definitely agree with him about not cheerleading for NATO, but that Putin is his own agent. Oh I'll quote the bit I found most relevant. In my opnion this is where it gets to the nitty gritty:
"Putin has been expressing his views on Ukraine extensively for years. In July 2021 Putin wrote [*links to Kremlin website*] (perhaps even himself) a 7,000-word article completely devoted to two points: that Ukraine is an inalienable part of Russia and that Ukrainians have no right to govern themselves unless they do so in deep collaboration with Russia. The piece argues that an unbreakable connection between Russia and Ukraine existed for over a thousand years until it was broken definitively by Lenin and the Bolsheviks, allowing a large Ukrainian Soviet republic to become an independent state when the Soviet Union collapsed.
Forget for a moment the bizarre assumption that nations take on their eternal form at one particular moment of creation. Putin’s more important quote is this: “Soviet nationality policy created three separate Slavic peoples, when in fact there is only one large Russian nation, a triune people comprising Great Russians [i.e., Russians], Little Russians [i.e., Ukrainians], and Belorussians.”
The problem, then, with all the accounts focusing on NATO—a topic barely mentioned in Putin’s July text—is that they deny Putin agency. They present Putin as someone capable only of reacting, to America. Putin has repeated endlessly, and with signal clarity, what he thinks of Ukraine apart from the question of NATO. The NATO question is certainly not unimportant, but western analysts who keep stressing its absolute centrality are just plain guilty of not letting easterners, even in this case Vladimir Putin himself, speak for themselves. Yet Putin is clear: if NATO, one year ago, had taken membership off the table, Putin would still be left with the problem of Ukraine insisting that it is a completely separate entity from Russia.
Further evidence for the centrality of the “one great Russian nation” theme comes from a remarkable article published a day after the invasion in Novosti, the official Russian news agency, and then deleted hours later when it realized the extent of Ukraine’s resistance. Amazingly, some in the top leadership have believed this would be a cakewalk, because the article announces that “a new era” has begun, with Russia “restoring its historical fullness” by re-uniting the Russian people “in its entirety of Great Russians, Belarussians, and Little Russians.” Ukrainian independence, it continues, is intolerable because it means the “de-Russification of Russians.”
How much clearer can Russia say that NATO was only a minor symptom of a bigger problem? Publicly Russia spoke about NATO because it knew that this was something anyone wary of American power could latch onto, as a way of minimizing Russian responsibility. We should indeed be wary of American power. But if we are to listen to what Putin says, then we must acknowledge his clear and proud expressions of utterly imperialist ambitions toward Ukraine."
This is just a load of phrases strung together and doesn't actually mean anything.Don't 100% agree with your assesements, however points you bring up are very important in understanding the situation and how the conflict with Russian military intervention came about!Interesting point on
Slavic identiy, agree in some way, consider Serb Nationalism at the end of cold war, blatantly re-invented, much on historical mythology of conflicts with previous Empires; Ottoman, Hapsburg etc. to justify ethnic cleansing among other negative directions and actions!
However, like the Proxy war in Ukraine they were following the lead from EU and Western Imperialism: Predominantely German financial strategies through trade finance & banking thaat led to splitting and recognition of Slovenia & Croatia as western; predominately EU allies leading to Balkanisation of Yugoslavia, before Milosovic opportunistically encouraged Chauvanism & Reactionary Nationalism in Kosova and slightly later Bosnia!
However, like the Proxy war in Ukraine they were following the lead from EU and Western Imperialism:
Yes, and I'm worried that things might get really nasty in the Balkans again.Don't 100% agree with your assesements, however points you bring up are very important in understanding the situation and how the conflict with Russian military intervention came about!Interesting point on
Slavic identiy, agree in some way, consider Serb Nationalism at the end of cold war, blatantly re-invented, much on historical mythology of conflicts with previous Empires; Ottoman, Hapsburg etc. to justify ethnic cleansing among other negative directions and actions!
However, like the Proxy war in Ukraine they were following the lead from EU and Western Imperialism: Predominantely German financial strategies through trade finance & banking thaat led to splitting and recognition of Slovenia & Croatia as western; predominately EU allies leading to Balkanisation of Yugoslavia, before Milosovic opportunistically encouraged Chauvanism & Reactionary Nationalism in Kosova and slightly later Bosnia!