Donna Ferentes said:I wrote one once after somebody kept drinking my milk. It went something like:
Before drinking the milk in the fridge from the carton marked Donna, please check that your name is, in fact, Donna. Somebody has been drinking from it under the apparent impression that their name is Donna, which surprises me as to my knowledge I am in fact the only Donna working here. If you are not sure what your name is, please check with a friend beforehand. Thank you.
pk said:Twat goes pale and says fuck all, escorted out, never to be seen again.
nah - it was hilariouschio said:that isn't actually that funny
Loki said:Wrong, wrong and wrong! In fact, I read about a study that found that people with "untidy" cluttered desks are mostly more productive and creative than their clean desk counterparts.
Mr_Nice said:Had a classic a while ago ... some woman sent out an email on the coporate distribution list saying that she had an ironing board for sale for £15, then some one replied to ALL asking if she would take £10 then an IT bod mails everyone to say that this is using up valuable resource, then some one else replies asking if it came with an iron then somebody higher the chain said stop sending any more mails, then another jobs worth sent another to all saying that he was quite right ...etc
Can whoever has taken the plugbank from my room return it immediately.
Bob Marleys Dad said:fuck knows what a plugbank is.
Yes, summat similar happened once when I worked in a company with about 20,000 employees. Someone sent a local office email company wide and we rolled around in hysterics as dozens of people who weren't paying attention hit "Reply-all" with stuff like, "Thanks, I can't see how a printer in Staines is relevant to me here in Tampa, but I'll see what I can do" etc...Iam said:It was sent not to a couple of people nearby in the office, but to the national distribution list, and followed up seconds later with another titled "Yoghurtgate".
fractionMan said:Where, where is that study?
craigxcraig said:I had this one after a partic big weekend:
I have to email this to you to let you know how I feel about this afternoon.
Mate, you turned up for work at 1pm and where an absolute waste of space, it was really not worth you coming in!!! I am really flexible with you changing holidays so you can have half day on Friday and half day on Monday, but to be honest I feel you are taking the p*ss out of me!!! Turning up and you are not able to distinguish between whether it is Monday or Tuesday is unacceptable!!! I really am annoyed and disappointed beacuse I have tried to help you when you aksed for Friday half day instead of all day Monday!!
In the future, I will definitely think twice about things. I know everyone has heavy weekends but coming into work and blatantly being incapable of doing anything is really out of order. You are quick enough to tell everyone how ruined you are and how you need to sleep...... but I would rather not here it.... and it is actually not funny!!!
Then to top it off when you where leaving saying ........'I am sorry i have been useless today; I will be ebtter tomorrow' really does almost tip me over the edge.
For those using the shower please stop taking the Fairy liquid from the lower ground kitchen to wash your bits…it’s just wrong.
.Plastic wrappers from the Café’s 80p small baguettes will not flush down the toilets.
To the kind person that’s attempted this in the lower ground gents please come and fish it out
As we seem to be on a theme lately with toilet training, I hope we don’t need to arrange an actual training session, the first floor ladies will not flush themselves – it hadn’t even been attempted, don’t ask how I know this.
KellyDJ said:One we used to have in the ladies toilets of my past jobs
please clean the toilet after use. Other people do not want to see your mess. Apart from being unhygenic it's also disgusting!!!
The HEAD of IT made this error? That is amazingly bad.May Kasahara said:Reminds me of the rather IT-unaware place I used to work at - one day everyone's system slowed down, really badly, during a very busy data entry period. No one knew why. Then everyone received an email with a MASSIVE attachment, which someone in management had sent round to everyone for no reason. Then the head of IT forwarded it around to everyone again, pointing out that sending massive attachments slows the system down considerably. Then our head of department replied (to everyone) to this email, still with attachment, agreeing how unnecessary and thoughtless it was and could everybody stop doing it please.
pk said:Twat goes pale and says fuck all, escorted out, never to be seen again.
Mr Smin said:The HEAD of IT made this error? That is amazingly bad.
Poi E said:But he perks up later as his lawyer files an action for unfair dismissal
chio said:that isn't actually that funny
May Kasahara said:To be fair to him, he was a fucking moron.
This isn't the study I read before, but it will dofractionMan said:Where, where is that study?
Work by Steve Whittaker and Julia Hirschberg of ATT Labs-Research, however, suggests that clutter may actually be quite an efficient organising principle. In "The Character, Value and Management of Personal Paper Archives", they examine the distinction that MIT's Tom Malone draws between "filers" and "pilers".
When filers receive paperwork, they put it away. When pilers get it, they leave it on the desk--not randomly, but in concentric circles. There is a "hot" area, of stuff that the worker is dealing with right now. There is a "warm" area, of stuff that needs to be got through in the next few days: it may be there, in part, as a prompt. And there is a "cold" area, at the edges of the desk, of stuff which could just as well be in an archive (or, often, the bin).
According to Mr Whittaker and Ms Hirschberg, the assumption that filers can find stuff more quickly is wrong. Filers, they say, "are less likely to access a given piece of data, and more likely to acquire extraneous data...In moderation, piling has the benefits of providing somewhat ready access to materials as well as reminding about tasks currently in progress." Filers have two problems finding stuff: they tend to file too much, because they have put so much effort into building a filing system, and they often find it hard to remember how they categorised things.
As well as giving much-needed succour to those attached to the ecology of their desktops, these studies have some serious implications for managers. If they interfere with people's desktops, they may also interfere with their thinking. Trying to force workers to get rid of clutter and scan their papers into a computer system may be an expensive waste of time. Companies which do this may find that they create large, useless databases full of information that nobody ever uses.