invisibleplanet
porter des cornes
The Children of a Vanished World are waiting ...
Can we clear something up, please? How many people were killed in the Nazi death camps, and how were they killed?
That's not exactly an extermination plan, is it?...
....No, again this is not the same as a plan to exterminate the Jews.
Who are these "mainstream holocaust researchers"?
Well, EVERYONE I presume, including all researchers who are not Holocaust deniers. Frankly I am surprised that this is taken as a controversial statement and that for some mysterious reason now all of a sudden everyone thinks I am a Holocaust denier. What's wrong with you people? Here I've spent something like 50 pages explaining that you guys have more in common with the Nazis than you think and it should be quite clear from my writing that I think Nazism is evil, and then all of a sudden *I* am a Nazi supporter!?!?!? How is that level of evasion and mind twisting contradiction even possible without your brains exploding?
Answer the question directly, and stop avoiding/evading.Well, EVERYONE I presume, including all researchers who are not Holocaust deniers. Frankly I am surprised that this is taken as a controversial statement and that for some mysterious reason now all of a sudden everyone thinks I am a Holocaust denier. What's wrong with you people? Here I've spent something like 50 pages explaining that you guys have more in common with the Nazis than you think and it should be quite clear from my writing that I think Nazism is evil, and then all of a sudden *I* am a Nazi supporter!?!?!? How is that level of evasion and mind twisting contradiction even possible without your brains exploding?
Well, EVERYONE I presume, including all researchers who are not Holocaust deniers. Frankly I am surprised that this is taken as a controversial statement and that for some mysterious reason now all of a sudden everyone thinks I am a Holocaust denier. What's wrong with you people? Here I've spent something like 50 pages explaining that you guys have more in common with the Nazis than you think and it should be quite clear from my writing that I think Nazism is evil, and then all of a sudden *I* am a Nazi supporter!?!?!? How is that level of evasion and mind twisting contradiction even possible without your brains exploding?
Well, EVERYONE I presume, including all researchers who are not Holocaust deniers. Frankly I am surprised that this is taken as a controversial statement and that for some mysterious reason now all of a sudden everyone thinks I am a Holocaust denier. What's wrong with you people? Here I've spent something like 50 pages explaining that you guys have more in common with the Nazis than you think and it should be quite clear from my writing that I think Nazism is evil, and then all of a sudden *I* am a Nazi supporter!?!?!? How is that level of evasion and mind twisting contradiction even possible without your brains exploding?
No. I'm just not seeing as big a difference between you all as you seem to think there is. Opposite sides of the same coin.
Actually, Onar should answer lbj's question. That will determine whether he is denying or not.
I hope all the people who read his blog see this.
No it's Himmler's attempt at a defence; do you think it holds water?
I didn't originally refer to the jews. I was pointing out the existence of plans for systematic killing, killing which went onto include extermination camps where not only jews met their deaths.
You are squirming, but no amount of wriggling will get you away from the questions as to your preferred holocaust historians and scientists; so lets be having them.
I explicitly asked for references to concrete plans to exterminate the Jews, because I was unaware of any such plan. Whether Himmler's attempt at a defence holds water or not is completely irrelevant, because at least it is very clear that his defence in no way is an admission of an extermination plan.
Sorry, then I misunderstood. I thought you were talking about extermination plans, not of individuals, but of a plan to systematically wipe out an entire people (or race as Hitler would call it).
I don't have any preferred holocaust historians. I have read quite a bit on the holocaust and as far as I can tell I am in no way making any remotely controversial statements here. Remember, I never said that the holocaust didn't happen. I said that there was no physical evidence of industrial scale deliberate extermination of Jews. Of course the mainstream scientists and the holocaust deniers have very different accounts of why the evidence doesn't exist (the mainstream claims the physical evidence was destroyed by the Nazis, whereas the deniers claim that the evidence never existed in the first place) but as far as I know there is no disagreement as to the lack of physical evidence.
Well, EVERYONE I presume, including all researchers who are not Holocaust deniers. Frankly I am surprised that this is taken as a controversial statement and that for some mysterious reason now all of a sudden everyone thinks I am a Holocaust denier. What's wrong with you people? Here I've spent something like 50 pages explaining that you guys have more in common with the Nazis than you think and it should be quite clear from my writing that I think Nazism is evil, and then all of a sudden *I* am a Nazi supporter!?!?!? How is that level of evasion and mind twisting contradiction even possible without your brains exploding?
= the Holocaust. And you're saying there's no physical evidence. How is that not Holocaust denial?industrial scale deliberate extermination of Jews
Come on, Onarchy, do as blagsta asks. Name one.
I explicitly asked for references to concrete plans to exterminate the Jews, because I was unaware of any such plan. Whether Himmler's attempt at a defence holds water or not is completely irrelevant, because at least it is very clear that his defence in no way is an admission of an extermination plan.
Sorry, then I misunderstood. I thought you were talking about extermination plans, not of individuals, but of a plan to systematically wipe out an entire people (or race as Hitler would call it).
I don't have any preferred holocaust historians. I have read quite a bit on the holocaust and as far as I can tell I am in no way making any remotely controversial statements here. Remember, I never said that the holocaust didn't happen. I said that there was no physical evidence of industrial scale deliberate extermination of Jews. Of course the mainstream scientists and the holocaust deniers have very different accounts of why the evidence doesn't exist (the mainstream claims the physical evidence was destroyed by the Nazis, whereas the deniers claim that the evidence never existed in the first place) but as far as I know there is no disagreement as to the lack of physical evidence.
Primo's waiting...
It's hard to come up with a more politically feeble narrative than Onar's 'you're all fascists', but you've done it; simultaneously useless and smug.
Louis MacNeice
Not now, Kizmet.It's can't be that hard since you've been doing it throughout the thread.
No, he first needs to give the citations, harvard reference style will be fine.
Name names, cite publications, reference documents.
Louis MacNeice