Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The 'Naked Rambler' jailed for 22 months, following arrest within 60 seconds of his release!

I guess it is possible that all the other prisoners - and the staff - are happy with a naked man walking around and never hassle him for it.

I read somewhere recently that he's banged up alone in his cell all day and they let him out for a hour or two after they bang everyone else up for the night. He doesn't get to mix with the other prisoners.
 
I read somewhere recently that he's banged up alone in his cell all day and they let him out for a hour or two after they bang everyone else up for the night. He doesn't get to mix with the other prisoners.

I should think if his incarceration is largely solitary and naked, this probably does not help his mental state.
 
I read somewhere recently that he's banged up alone in his cell all day and they let him out for a hour or two after they bang everyone else up for the night. He doesn't get to mix with the other prisoners.

Yes, this info is on one of the links posted earlier on this thread.
 
He is naked in prison too. He is well committed.
It may seem absurd and trivial to a lot of people but that's kind of the point.

the point of what

liberalist exhibitionism without any boundaries

im glad the cock flashing wierdo is in jail . Hoist on his own petard
 
You'd think people would just roll their eyes instead of getting ALARMED!


ok, your mum and your kids are passing a hedge in a quiet lane way . Next thing some cunt with his cock out comes round the corner

you berate your kids...for fucks sake stop crying, just roll your eyes instead, hysterical little gits

and the next time a stranger nonchalantly approaches your pesky kids with his cock out...just roll your eyes, and tell them he has a perfectly legitimate right to walk past your kids at any hour or any place
with his dick out.

because he has a fucking beard or something and is therefore somehiow anarchisty and left wing.

personally id shoot the cunt
 
He's been allowed out, without having to put on any clothes first. BTW Casually Red, context is all; there's a huge difference between an adult (or juvenile) who just happens to be naked while doing something non sexual, and somebody exposing their bits to shock or to get off on it.
 
I'm suprised by the amount of posts on here against this mans cause. Its just a person walking, who is naked. Its not as if he is called the wanking rambler ffs.

With regards to posts saying- why don't they just force him to leave the area in a van, or what ever - that's not the point. He wants to show the stupidity of law/authority/people by walking through these places naked. You can't just skip a bit because its difficult.

What he needs is about 100 other naked folk to join him when he gets out.

Shame its winter now
 
ok, your mum and your kids are passing a hedge in a quiet lane way . Next thing some cunt with his cock out comes round the corner

you berate your kids...for fucks sake stop crying, just roll your eyes instead, hysterical little gits

and the next time a stranger nonchalantly approaches your pesky kids with his cock out...just roll your eyes, and tell them he has a perfectly legitimate right to walk past your kids at any hour or any place
with his dick out.

because he has a fucking beard or something and is therefore somehiow anarchisty and left wing.

personally id shoot the cunt
Won't somebody please think of the children! [/hysterical wanker]
helen-lovejoy.jpg


Be ashamed of your body, like casually red is.
 
I'm suprised by the amount of posts on here against this mans cause. Its just a person walking, who is naked. Its not as if he is called the wanking rambler ffs.

With regards to posts saying- why don't they just force him to leave the area in a van, or what ever - that's not the point. He wants to show the stupidity of law/authority/people by walking through these places naked. You can't just skip a bit because its difficult.

What he needs is about 100 other naked folk to join him when he gets out.

Shame its winter now

hes only showing his own stupidity the exhibitionist prick . All he has to do is put his cock away for a bit . The reason there arent 100 other people like him is because his is a case involving unique stupidity .
Put a a pair of strides on and fuck off. Hes no martyr, hes a cock flashing exhibitionist . A foppish dilettante
 
ok, your mum and your kids are passing a hedge in a quiet lane way . Next thing some cunt with his cock out comes round the corner

you berate your kids...for fucks sake stop crying, just roll your eyes instead, hysterical little gits

and the next time a stranger nonchalantly approaches your pesky kids with his cock out...just roll your eyes, and tell them he has a perfectly legitimate right to walk past your kids at any hour or any place
with his dick out.

because he has a fucking beard or something and is therefore somehiow anarchisty and left wing.

personally id shoot the cunt

Course you would. Then berate your crying kids and your mum, what with her never having seen a naked man before. Well not one with gunshot wounds.
 
He's been allowed out, without having to put on any clothes first. BTW Casually Red, context is all; there's a huge difference between an adult (or juvenile) who just happens to be naked while doing something non sexual, and somebody exposing their bits to shock or to get off on it.

pray tell us what is the usual excuse for the ones who get caught at it, I believe its usually innocent casual nudism misinterpreted.
If youd be happy enough to let a naked man babysit your kids thats up to you . Personally id have a prejudice . Might make me a cunt in your liberal eyes but i can live with that .
 
Course you would. Then berate your crying kids and your mum, what with her never having seen a naked man before. Well not one with gunshot wounds.

the gunshot wounds would ensure she never saw 2 running about in the hedgerows . Theres a time and place.
 
pray tell us what is the usual excuse for the ones who get caught at it, I believe its usually innocent casual nudism misinterpreted.
If youd be happy enough to let a naked man babysit your kids thats up to you . Personally id have a prejudice . Might make me a cunt in your liberal eyes but i can live with that .
Unlike you, sweetie, I don't happen to read tabloids to get a cheap thrill from somebody else's alleged misdemeanours (or worse). I don't have children, but if I did, as long as I knew and trusted the man, I'd be comfortable with him babysitting no matter whatever he did or didn't wear. Also, sweetie, there's nudity and then there's nudity with sexual intent. In the same way as there's being dressed, and being dressed to seduce.

I'm sure that you can just about understand the difference, sweetie. It's not about how much is or isn't covered, it's about intent.

I've been called ridiculously old fashioned about such matters before, but compared to you... :rolleyes:
 
He's been allowed out, without having to put on any clothes first. BTW Casually Red, context is all; there's a huge difference between an adult (or juvenile) who just happens to be naked while doing something non sexual, and somebody exposing their bits to shock or to get off on it.
Seriously, how is someone meant to know, really.
I can't get my head a round how it is warm enough in scotland of all places to go around butt naked. I think the guy is a bit ill tbh.
There's plenty of other nudists but they take into account other people's feelings..
 
The difference? Well, I suppose not actually touching their genitals or looking around to see who's looking at them might be a dead giveaway that it's non sexual nudity.
 
Naked? Really? :hmm:
Yes. Why not, as long as he's neither doing anything sexual, nor intending to while there are minors in the same room?

Tbh I'm shocked and disgusted that you regard sexual intent and the lack of clothes as synonymous. And before you ask, no, I'm not a naturist.
 
Tbh I'm shocked and disgusted that you regard sexual intent and the lack of clothes as synonymous. And before you ask, not I'm not a naturist.

I don't, not necessarily. But I'd question his motivation for never wearing clothes. He's either mentally ill, in which case he needs help, or he's making some weird statement that nobody else feels the need to emulate. Either way I'd keep kids away from him.
 
I don't, not necessarily. But I'd question his motivation for never wearing clothes. He's either mentally ill, in which case he needs help, or he's making some weird statement that nobody else feels the need to emulate.<snip>
Well I'd question your motivation behind wanting everyone else to cover up as much as you do, but each to their own.

Incidentally, in the recent discussions (here and in the media) about paedophiles, was there any mention of those people being naked or near naked at the time? No? You do amaze me.
 
It's not about paedophilia, it's about what one feels is ok for kids, or anyone else, to be exposed (hur hur) to.

I reckon you lot are just trying to out-hippie each other!
 
The difference? Well, I suppose not actually touching their genitals or looking around to see who's looking at them might be a dead giveaway that it's non sexual nudity.
You can't really expect kids to know the difference....
This guy reminds me a bit of Brian Haw, who also clearly had mental health problems but was encouraged to carry on anyway. It seems to have become an obsession to put it mildly at the expense of anything else. He needs help imo.
 
You can't really expect kids to know the difference....
This guy reminds me a bit of Brian Haw, who also clearly had mental health problems but was encouraged to carry on anyway. It seems to have become an obsession to put it mildly at the expense of anything else. He needs help imo.
Can you expect children to differentiate between rough play (or violence in cartoons for that matter) and real violence?
 
Back
Top Bottom