BigTom
Well-Known Member
I've been longlisted for a job as a research administrator at the uni of birmingham, and they've sent me a call document for some funding money that is available, and asked me to summarise it in 250 words or less... but there's a summary at the start of the document which is around 300 words long and I've basically c+p'd that and removed some of it, down to around 200 words, but I don't think there's the need to include anything else from the full document (which is 8 pages long).
I mean, the people doing the funding have summarised it, and surely they'd know the most important information, I just feel strange having a test which involves me doing almost nothing. I've been through the whole document, I didn't even really clock that the first bit was a summary until I noticed I'd copied some bits which had the same information, and I don't think anything else needs to be in there really, there's a couple of bits I might have put in but they would take it over 250 words. It sounds wrong not to include it but these are the success criteria - only I can see that they are meaningless - "scientific excellence is the key criteria" like someone isn't going to put in a funding application (in social sciences) that doesn't claim to achieve scientific excellence. I bet that or something similar is there on the success criteria of every funder, just like diversity and inclusion is for arts funding.
Can I really just send them back the summary from the document itself. c+p'd bar a few sentences dropped and the odd word changed to make it make sense? It feels wrong, I guess because I reckon most people could see that there's a summary there so just copy that. Seems an odd test if it's that easy I suppose.
I mean, the people doing the funding have summarised it, and surely they'd know the most important information, I just feel strange having a test which involves me doing almost nothing. I've been through the whole document, I didn't even really clock that the first bit was a summary until I noticed I'd copied some bits which had the same information, and I don't think anything else needs to be in there really, there's a couple of bits I might have put in but they would take it over 250 words. It sounds wrong not to include it but these are the success criteria - only I can see that they are meaningless - "scientific excellence is the key criteria" like someone isn't going to put in a funding application (in social sciences) that doesn't claim to achieve scientific excellence. I bet that or something similar is there on the success criteria of every funder, just like diversity and inclusion is for arts funding.
Can I really just send them back the summary from the document itself. c+p'd bar a few sentences dropped and the odd word changed to make it make sense? It feels wrong, I guess because I reckon most people could see that there's a summary there so just copy that. Seems an odd test if it's that easy I suppose.