Anyway phil who do you think were responsible for the Reyhanli bombings in 2013?
Ergenekon.
Anyway phil who do you think were responsible for the Reyhanli bombings in 2013?
no, you haven't. you've proved yourself an arse for putting up evidence (of an attack denied by the pkk) which could have been supplied a day or two ago when asked for. telling your aj link didn't mention this 2008 incident but more telling that you've been reticent about this incident given you said you hated the pkk apparently on its basis. you've by no means proved me wrong as all i've done is ask you to substantiate your claims.Well I've just rationally proved you wrong, that's for sure.
Probably not usable and more of a danger to the looters than anyone they are fired at.
no, you haven't. you've proved yourself an arse for putting up evidence (of an attack denied by the pkk) which could have been supplied a day or two ago when asked for. telling your aj link didn't mention this 2008 incident but more telling that you've been reticent about this incident given you said you hated the pkk apparently on its basis. you've by no means proved me wrong as all i've done is ask you to substantiate your claims.
so unless phildwyer's got some as yet unseen evidence i call bullshit on his claim to hate the pkk because of attacks in istanbul
Aye, but you've looked a right clown for agesLiar.
You've repeatedly denied that the PKK have carried out attacks on civilians in Istanbul:
And now I have proved you wrong. Not that it was necessary to do so, since the facts have never been disputed by anyone except you and Coley. Naturally I don't expect a weirdo like yourself to acknowledge his error, but you look like a real clown now.
the post you quote says nothing about the pkk not carrying out attacks in istanbulLiar.
You've repeatedly denied that the PKK have carried out attacks on civilians in Istanbul:
And now I have proved you wrong.
Certainly won't be booking any Hols in Turkey
the post you quote says nothing about the pkk not carrying out attacks in istanbul
yes, at eton i was taught that tawdry publick intellectuals - like your good self - are all very good at the big distinctions, eg peace/war but fucking awful at anything subtleNow you're going to deny that you've denied it?
FFS, I give up. Is this what they taught you at Eton?
nothing to do with 'more knowledgeable' but to do with dwyer substantiating claims.ffs give it a break. I come here to learn about current events from knowledgeable people, not a pissing contest between those people about who's more knowledgeable.
I honestly don't care. It's ruining the thread and it's going nowhere. He said, you said, and we can make our own minds up. That'll do. Please?nothing to do with 'more knowledgeable' but to do with dwyer substantiating claims.
Fair point,but when someone is positively gleeful at the thought of Kobanis defenders being massacred,it is a bit hard to let slide.I honestly don't care. It's ruining the thread and it's going nowhere. He said, you said, and we can make our own minds up. That'll do. Please?
No way they can be improvised then?Probably not usable and more of a danger to the looters than anyone they are fired at.
Rockets and shells have a kill by date and that relies on being stored correctly developing world military's don't do stock control very well and lots of Cold War surplus means arsenals in developing worlds are going boom with regularity
Fair point,but when someone is positively gleeful at the thought of Kobanis defenders being massacred,it is a bit hard to let slide.
Sorry Crispy, but you'll understand that I can't let this go without comment.
Coley you berk. Nobody has been "positively gleeful' at that prospect.
If you think they have, you should provide evidence. Either do so, or withdraw your statement.
FFS this is ridiculous. Where do you get off spouting crap like this?
"Thing is, the PKK declared war on the Turkish state 20 years ago. Now they´re under attack from another direction. I venture to suggest that every single government in the world would see that as a godsend, and exploit it to the fullest extent possible. It would be remiss of them to do otherwise."
I despise the PKK, but I don´t endorse a massacre.
Any links?seems like the YPG have taken another hill on the edge of the city, this time to the east. I think that is Mistenur Hill which had the black IS flag on it before.
Here's a reading suggesting that this actually is a sign that things are getting better:Not getting any better.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-29606089
More reports of beheadings and the Iraqi army refusing to fight.
Everyone should calm down. The reality is that ISIL and its forerunners have always been in Baghdad. The Iraqi capital and its rural exurbs – the “Baghdad belts” — have been a desperate battleground since 2003.
True, ISIL has been posing much more of a direct threat to Baghdad since the beginning of 2014, when the movement took control of Fallujah, a city of 300,000 that is located just 25 miles west of Baghdad International Airport. But Baghdad won’t fall to cascading panic the way that Mosul did in June 2014, no matter how many towns and cities ISIL overruns in the Euphrates River Valley to the northwest of the capital.
Here’s why. Mosul was a predominately Sunni city of one million people where the Shia-led security forces were despised and where the bulk of Iraq’s security forces were hundreds of miles away. Baghdad is a predominately Shia city of more than seven million and the hub of a gargantuan popular mobilization of Shia militias and regular security forces.
In truth, the threat posed to Baghdad this autumn is emerging less because ISIL is winning the war in Iraq and more because it might be slowly but steadily losing it. All across north-central Iraq, ISIL is being challenged by joint forces comprised of Sunni tribes, Shia militias, Iraqi soldiers, Iranian advisors and U.S. airpower. ISIL is struggling to maintain its grip on this battlefield of strange bedfellows, and it could be moving on Baghdad now out of a desperate need for a big victory more than anything else. Even as ISIL appears to be making progress in marginal places like Kobane, the Syrian Kurdish border town, inside Iraq the group has been faltering and needs a new front to rejuvenate its campaign.
Among the less-noted victories against ISIL recently: In early October, Kurdish peshmerga forces and local Sunni tribesmen of the Shammar confederation – usually bitter rivals – cooperated in a three-day blitzkrieg that recaptured the vital Rabiya border crossing that links the ISIL territories in Iraq and Syria. In Dhuluiya, 45 miles north of Baghdad, Sunni tribesmen of the Jabouri confederation are pushing ISIL back from their lands in collaboration with both Iraqi Army forces and, stunningly, Iranian-backed Shia militiamen from the Kataib Hezbollah movement.
Near Kirkuk, the Obeidi confederation, another conglomeration of Sunni tribes, is starting to cooperate with Shia Turkmen tribes and Kurdish security forces against ISIL. For the first time since June, the Iraqi government is able to drive tanks and supply columns all the way from Baghdad to Kirkuk, allowing the security forces to open a new front on ISIL’s eastern flank.
No way they can be improvised then?
Yeah sorry I got it from a couple of messages off Jenan Moussa's twitter, here's her exact words: "Eyewitnesses on Turkey border tell me black flag of ISIS on sandy hill #kobane was taken down by Kurds early morning. Now airstrikes there."Any links?
Reading that,you can draw the conclusion that the longer Kobani holds out the better the chances of IS being degraded beyond repair?Here's a reading suggesting that this actually is a sign that things are getting better:
Why the Islamic State Is Losing - The pundits have it wrong—the terrorists’ move toward Baghdad is a sign of desperation.
And also, have a read of this to compare the above with the Mosul shambles:
Special report - How Mosul fell
And one last thing - excellent pic of YPG/YPJ snipers:
The ground for various such "organisations" is way deeper than one town defying them and eluding them...
More like a red cloth before the bull, I would say... There is no rational debate with these guys, I fear!
Well, not yet, anyway. Maybe later on, when they suffer a lot more and figure out their own vulnerability...
...The ground for various such "organisations" is way deeper than one town defying them and eluding them...
More like a red cloth before the bull, I would say...
Aye, and IS know if they don't succeed here they will lose a lot of credibility so they keep hoying reinforcements in which in turn make nice targets. It would be a game changer if Turkey relented and allowed reinforcements in.actually, the more effort they devote to taking particular targets, the more focused their forces are - the easier it is to firstly see and target them from the air, and the more effective air strikes are at degrading them.
if you want to kill wasps, should you chase them around your garden with a fly-swat, or should you hang around the nest with a fly-swat, some wasp spray, a litre of Unleaded and a long match?