According to that scumbag if your husband starts yelling at you you should keep quiet and then when he's done, quietly ask if he wants a glass of water.
perhaps his career will only really take off when he's deadYou'll also be pleased to know that the reason why i found that blog is because i went to his blog to see if he was dead or not and found a post moaning that he thought he was about to be killed and how lonely he was without his friends, and posting a link to ten different sites asking people to promote his writing in the event of his death!
Anyone seen another source for this? PKK YDG-H statement claiming they've killed an IS operative in Istanbul as a response to Suruc bombing.
this may be one of the best spent £60,000 in all of human history. raping, murdering, wife-beating peice of shit? check. pathetic, teenaged angst ridden prick inflicting appalling writing on anyone he's not raping, murdering, or beating? check....
I can't access that in this part of the world, but it sounds totally plausible. It's exactly what people in Turkey have feared for ages: the war coming home.
YDG-H statement plus translation from twitter. Essentially - 'High ranking IS fighter/present at Kobani/tracked for 3 months/killed in response to Suruc massacre/expect more'
I certainly do expect more.
The really disturbing question is: what was a high-ranking IS fighter doing in Istanbul?
Fuck celebrating a drone as a dispenser of justice. 28 civilians killed by drones for every (extra-judicially designated) militant. Any evidence to suggest that British drones are more or less accurate than their US counterparts?
You're right of course but i really struggle with my dislike for military intervention vs wanting them all to meet a bad end
The one place he does identify as behaving in the way he would like, I imagine the security services are taking a very close look at...
I know - but if/when the drone campaign kills more civilians than rotters, then it's morally bankrupt and politically counter-productive. And as phildwyer points out regularly, dead civilians are easily exploited by those pushing the jihadi narrative.
(ETA - I know you know this, too - I'm explaining my position, not trying to tell you yours).
That's my fault for not typing out the entire press release - according to the (single source) statement, 'among ISIS fighters during the Kobani siege and had returned for treatment to Istanbul seven months ago'. He's named as Mursul Gul - which is a Turkish name, is it?
which one is that?
Fuck celebrating a drone as a dispenser of justice. 28 civilians killed by drones for every (extra-judicially designated) militant. Any evidence to suggest that British drones are more or less accurate than their US counterparts?
you can either use what is available and live with the undesired effects
I know - but if/when the drone campaign kills more civilians than rotters, then it's morally bankrupt and politically counter-productive. And as phildwyer points out regularly, dead civilians are easily exploited by those pushing the jihadi narrative.
(ETA - I know you know this, too - I'm explaining my position, not trying to tell you yours).
This isn't having a go or anything but what do you do?I cant remember now and i dont really want to access that stuff at work.
It's pretty easy to "live with the undesired effects" when you live 2,000 miles away.
any evidence to suggest that a manned platform is any more or less accurate/discriminating than a UAV, or an artillery shell, or a magazine full of 7.62 short?
No, no. Just a bit of a facetious question on my part. Reading back it does seem a little bit intrusive.sorry for making you feel that wayJust a temp admin job. Im posting from my phone. Sorry should i delete those quotes as im getting a bit paranoid?
It's this, isn't it? The operators don't live with the undesired effects - & wouldn't tolerate them at home. '28 people hanged this morning in Strangeways - Department of Justice very confident that one of them was a notorious murderer'.
any evidence to suggest that a manned platform is any more or less accurate/discriminating than a UAV, or an artillery shell, or a magazine full of 7.62 short?
ISR is not perfect, targetting is not perfect, accuracy is not perfect, lethal effects area is not 30cm. you can either use what is available and live with the undesired effects, or you can use nothing and watch IS sweeping aside all before them.
purity has a cost.