ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
all those born again 12 step people you encounter on campus i suppose
He drives his students to drink?
all those born again 12 step people you encounter on campus i suppose
another ISIS apologist. fuck off.
and you dwyer, you're a fucking cunt of the first order. it's all OUR fault is it? it's OUR fault? WE did it? who is WE? you fucking wet-wipe globetrotting liberal twat. fanboy.
Are YOU Muslim, if not then why are you investing yourself emotionally in believing that there is a correct form of Islam?
Degrade and diminish 'Islam'? From what otherwise purely accepted benchmark? I have my own criticisms of Quilliam, and individuals who work for Quilliam, but this is very dodgy ground. Are Quilliam bad because they are deviating from a more, objectively correct, form of Islam? If so, what about Alawite and Shia Muslims? If Quilliam are quislings then does that make ISIS the resistance forces?
If I had another life I'd research my hunch that Protestantism was inspired by contact with Islam.
that doesn't seem true for al-baghdadi
by the way - the simple reason why there is such savagery in these individual acts (like chucking a gay bloke off a building, or watching a man burn, or killing children, etc) is because of one thing - religious mania. the political might motivate it somewhat, but the religious mania will really up the game in the mindless savagery stakes. drop books not bombs on these people and it might temper their extremism, their grotesque cruelty.
The Jew are involved as well? I fucking knew it.
Yep; "S" for state.Unfortunately religion and politics are both belief systems. Religion doesn't turn "normal" people into ravening beasts any more than politics does.
Those who participate in ISIS do so from choice.They may claim religion as their primary motivation, but their primary motivation is actually power - the power over whether someone lives or dies. Everything else is window dressing.
As for "savagery", measured against what? Dwyer might be a tool, but he's right about the actions of "the west" in the Middle East giving licence to the likes of ISIS.
Dwyer might be a tool, but he's right about the actions of "the west" in the Middle East giving licence to the likes of ISIS.
But then again the Cathars were based in the south of France, part of a Mediterranean world which also had close relationships to the Muslim communities not so far away.
And their heresy was Manichean, unlike Luther's.
there was no islamophobick intent or insult intended.You're coming across as an Islamophobe but here in the UK that's the norm.
Well done.
there was no islamophobick intent or insult intended.
if China, say, had imperial land grabs in the UK, and stole much needed resources, and took the best bits for themselves and left the British with nothing...if China carried out air strikes on perceived British enemies, say, and many civilians would be killed...
....never, ever would i grab one of them, especially a mere pilot, and put him in a cage and watch him slowly burn to death.
no matter how desperate, i would not train disabled children to walk into Chinese strong holds and blow themselves up.
it is the responsibility of everyone to not excuse these cretins.
can you imagine the joy these fuckers feel when they see some hand wringing liberal justifying this shit? if there was any doubt in their mind about acting like a monster, that would certainly help to get rid of it.
so true of so many of your posts.HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHHA
HAHA
HA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
It would be funny if it wasn't so stupid.
speaking as an emigrant yourself, i'm sure.
there's at least 192 countries would not want yer man as a citizenAs a "citizen of the world",surely?
I'm fucked if I'm going to watch the beheading vids, but from what I've been reading ISIS have taken it to the next level by revelling in the obscenity of their crimes.
Did the previous Jihadist groups try to stick to the old recruiting sergeant's trick of portraying war as noble, or were they dealers in obscenity as well? (genuine question)
there's at least 192 countries would not want yer man as a citizen
193. I conducted a survey, and Wales doesn't want him back!
given the difficulty you've had differentiating between land and air forces i think it's safe to say you're not in a position to say what's obvious to a rational mind.I'd happily (indeed joyfully) cop to the first point, if only people could grasp the second. But it seems they simply cannot. I'm not entirely sure why, for nothing could be much more obvious to a rational mind. Perhaps it is a testament to the media's ability to induce cognitive dissonance?
there was no islamophobick intent or insult intended.
there was no islamophobick intent or insult intended.
Close but violently hostile relations. I've never seen any evidence, or even any assertion, that the Cathars were influenced by Islam. It's not impossible, but it's very improbable.
But Islam is not Manichean. Do you have any serious theories about this, or is this just speculation?
can you link to this boast?HAHAHAHAHAHA...HAHAH...HA...ha haha... heh...heh...
Phew, just managed to stop laughing. Thanks Pickman's. In fact we'll have it one more time:
HAHAHAHA. This from the man who boasts about publicly burning the Prophet in effigy.
Right Pickman's? You did that, didn't you? You burned an effigy of Mohammed in a London park. And now you expect us to believe that you didn't intend any Islamophobic insult! You know what I say to that? I say this:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Twat.
That's my whole point, you shit for brains fuck-knuckle - that the case of the Cathars, who were in relatively close proximity to the Muslim world, but who did not develop their religious heresy in ways analagous to Islam (but who were instead Manicheans, a religious worldview anathema to both Christianity and Islam), would seem to contradict laptop's hypothesis (which is by no means outrageous, I think) that analogies between Luther's version of Christianity might be related to the proximity of central Europe to those parts of the continent under Ottoman rule at that time.