Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The end of cash?

Another case of cherry picking data if you add up the would struggle column then it come to 10.5 million or 19% of the population so that survey says 81% would be alright in a cashless society even if they 'preferred' cash to remain and would grumble about it. I would prefer cash to remain for a number of reasons but I'm confident that I would cope fine if it went.
It isn't going to get banned though is it? It's just going to be harder and harder to get hold of and use and whilst there might be the odd peak and trough the path is downward.

It was 20 years ago chip and pin was introduced. This isn't something that's happening in the next few years.
 
Another big issue with polls is the number of people surveyed. A survey of 100 people is meaningless whereas a survey of 10,000 is considerably more meaningful.

This is a bit of an oversimplification of how sampling and stats work. A survey of 100 people would probably have a low confidence interval but it's not meaningless.

Not aimed at you particularly but you see 'small sample size!' on here all the time to dismiss stuff with no actual attempt to look at what it means.
 
I want to hear the "principled cash users" defence of their support for the banking industry, by using those notes, which don't have any inherent value, and are really just bits of paper that make a weird promise to "pay the bearer on demand", a promise that can't necessarily be kept. If the bank disappears then the value of their bits of paper disappears so they are heavily invested in making sure this doesn't happen.

Why don't they conduct all transactions in gold pieces, or onions, or direct bartering agreements? The fact that they don't shows how uncaring they are, very much "I'm alright jack" while they prop up the banking sector that so ruthlessly exploits the least privileged in society.
 
I want to hear the "principled cash users" defence of their support for the banking industry, by using those notes, which don't have any inherent value, and are really just bits of paper that make a weird promise to "pay the bearer on demand", a promise that can't necessarily be kept. If the bank disappears then the value of their bits of paper disappears so they are heavily invested in making sure this doesn't happen.

Why don't they conduct all transactions in gold pieces, or onions, or direct bartering agreements? The fact that they don't shows how uncaring they are, very much "I'm alright jack" while they prop up the banking sector that so ruthlessly exploits the least privileged in society.
yawn
 
Another case of cherry picking data if you add up the would struggle column then it come to 10.5 million or 19% of the population so that survey says 81% would be alright in a cashless society even if they 'preferred' cash to remain and would grumble about it. I would prefer cash to remain for a number of reasons but I'm confident that I would cope fine if it went.
It isn't going to get banned though is it? It's just going to be harder and harder to get hold of and use and whilst there might be the odd peak and trough the path is downward.
I don't really see the "cherry picking" angle at all, let alone again?
The point that the survey, when extrapolated from the sample, indicated around 10 million people who would struggle in a cashless economy is, surely, the salient point made.

If the vermin Government accept that, to the point where this last week they have legislated for minimum (free) cash access, then concerns about the potential social and economic impacts must be real enough.
 
Even though you have reposted information literally included in the OP and repeatedly discussed over the course of 4 years since then, I still don't understand. Because an increasingly cashless society does not cause me personally many major problems, I am unable to comprehend how it could be a problem for anyone else nor do I care in the slightest.
liquidindian To answer your question about "I'm all right Jack" remarks on this thread, I'd say the bolded in this post from teuchter is a classic example.
 
Back
Top Bottom