dolly's gal
killing things
has joe croaked it yet?
Not unless he has and nobody has noticed yet.has joe croaked it yet?
Not unless he has and nobody has noticed yet.
He's drawing the knot ever tighter, job-sharing now. Helen allegedly mis-ordered the fruit for the shop (but of course she didn't) so it was twice what was needed but R is not making TOO much fuss, just marking it down in that noble long-suffering way he has.i haven't listened to it in weeks. if the traffic's bad i'll catch tonight's episode on the way home. i see from this thread though that the Helen/Rob story-line hasn't progressed AT ALL
That already happened, she drove past him stopped and tried to speak to him but he was having nothing and .. anyhow it happened a few days ago... Am waiting impatiently for the scene where Ian, who's been pointedly ignoring her calls, gives her a piece of his mind.
Sorry I missed that. How does she explain that to herself, I wonder.That already happened, she drove past him stopped and tried to speak to him but he was having nothing and .. anyhow it happened a few days ago.
Ian didn't say that it was Rob who told him about his partner and Charlie, but he blanked Helen who was shocked, nothing more was said by her about it in that episode iirc.Sorry I missed that. How does she explain that to herself, I wonder.
And what were your respective positions?Tonight ended up arguing with Ms T about Rob's motives for all this bollocks. He is wickedness incarnate.
That already happened, she drove past him stopped and tried to speak to him but he was having nothing and .. anyhow it happened a few days ago.
Yes it did happen and he did give her a telling off for letting him down but she's still trying to contact him again by phone with no success so far.Sorry I missed that. How does she explain that to herself, I wonder.
I'm with Ms T. ObviouslyOk, so Ms T and myself were discussing Rob's possible motivations. Ms t says 'power' and it's certainly true that over the months Rob has been weakening those around him and gradually gathering the strings and wherewithal to isolate the hapless Helen. But I wonder at the logic, since he'll destroy what he loves by this course of action.
Then I shrug and enjoy Rob for what he is; a dramatic character with motivations granted to him by dramatists
It says "on the 20th September a vehicle registered to you drove at 38mph in a 30mph zone in Oxford, you have 20 days to confirm the identity of the driver. Failure to identify the driver in 20 days will result in a fine or a court summons.So, I found out what Phoebe's letter from Oxford says.
Bit far fetched. I drove in Oxford once, and seldom got above 5mph. In fact 5mph would have been cause for celebration.It says "on the 20th September a vehicle registered to you drove at 38mph in a 30mph zone in Oxford, you have 20 days to confirm the identity of the driver. Failure to identify the driver in 20 days will result in a fine or a court summons.
I used to have a car like that!Bit far fetched. I drove in Oxford once, and seldom got above 5mph. In fact 5mph would have been cause for celebration.
Rob told Ian about Ian's boyfriend and Charlie snogging.okay so I'm lost. why does Ian hate Helen so much? What's Rob done to engineer that?
Except he went much further than that - he told Ian that Adam and Charlie had been having an affair for months, and that Helen and everyone in the village knew, and that Helen had told him that (ie implicating that she'd spread all the rumours, even the ones that we know aren't true). Not just one drunken new years snog, but a whole years worth of affair.Rob told Ian about Ian's boyfriend and Charlie snogging.
Ian believes Helen told Rob when she should actually have told him.
He believes she was gossiping behind his back.
Oh ok ... I can't have been concentrating.Except he went much further than that - he told Ian that Adam and Charlie had been having an affair for months, and that Helen and everyone in the village knew, and that Helen had told him that (ie implicating that she'd spread all the rumours, even the ones that we know aren't true). Not just one drunken new years snog, but a whole years worth of affair.
Except he went much further than that - he told Ian that Adam and Charlie had been having an affair for months, and that Helen and everyone in the village knew, and that Helen had told him that (ie implicating that she'd spread all the rumours, even the ones that we know aren't true). Not just one drunken new years snog, but a whole years worth of affair.
Can someone explain to me why David's so upset about the cows going under Ruth's proposals when he was going to get rid of them altogether when she was in NZ?