Don't forget Adam and Rob had a right falling out over a cricket match (Adam in the wrong IMO)
Video, iirc.Why did Rob delete the photo from Helen's phone then eh? eh? Answer me that then.
Yeah, so he made her life miserable as well, but I still don't understand what the writers are doing with him.Remember Jess telling Helen 'You don't know what he's like'?
Yes. This business of a cosy Christmas with just the three of them is part of that.He wants to mess up Helen's friendship with Ian as part of his isolation of her. It's typical abuser shit. I love you so much I want you all to myself. He is jealous of her loving family and her friendships and trades on her history of anorexia and lack of confidence.
Thankfully, I have never been subjected to such abuse, but I always figured that they did it because they wanted and needed to be loved and felt that the way to get that love was to control their loved ones. So I do understand him wanting Christmas alone with her and Henry, and I understand him making her wear frumpy dresses, and him wanting her at home to look after him when he was working, but I don't understand why he doesn't even let her make decisions about the shop, and why he is making her think she has gone mad and that she keeps forgetting things or misunderstanding things.It's power and control, he wants power and control over Helen. That's why perpetrators of DV do what they do. They aren't generally very nice people.
Does Rob know about Helen's anorexia? cos he was needling her about eating too much at the wedding which is pretty low (no lower than his other antics though).
Yep. It's proper horrid, shout at the radio stuff.Even if he is unaware, it's just another way to control innit. It's that whole thing of nothing the victim does is ever quite right. I don't listen but from what I read it seems they are doing the coercive control aspect of it brilliantly.
Thankfully, I have never been subjected to such abuse, but I always figured that they did it because they wanted and needed to be loved and felt that the way to get that love was to control their loved ones. So I do understand him wanting Christmas alone with her and Henry, and I understand him making her wear frumpy dresses, and him wanting her at home to look after him when he was working, but I don't understand why he doesn't even let her make decisions about the shop, and why he is making her think she has gone mad and that she keeps forgetting things or misunderstanding things.
I think he is getting more and more evil as the writers get into their stride. I am wondering whether the writers are finding out more and more about what abusers do, and are beefing it up as they go.
Yep. It's proper horrid, shout at the radio stuff.
And yet in parallel, there is the Ruth in NZ storyline ...Just caught up. Ugh. Seriously creepy. One of rhe most believable storylines in a long time
And yet in parallel, there is the Ruth in NZ storyline ...
well, since last year...which is one of the most unbelievable storylines in a long time.
That long?well, since last year
Yeah but Ruth has an inheritance David has his eye on.I'm still a bit confused at how their farming nouse is so poor after 20 odd years of farming that they've gone from considering a robotic milker, lending feckless brother £££s and blithely handing over the income from Rickyard's to being on the brink of milk-related financial ruin within a few months
Ruth is gone. Roy and Kirsty to hook up. Titchener to BURN IN HELL but they'll string us out. Can't they just go back to it being about nothing?what's the betting that if she comes back it's a different actor