Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
No it hasn't.It's been repeatedly stated that he basically told muslim pupils to fuck off and leave the white kids to it.
No it hasn't.It's been repeatedly stated that he basically told muslim pupils to fuck off and leave the white kids to it.
Who has said the subject should be avoided? All I see is people saying the opposite.
.
Workers safety might also mean not drawing, publishing, printing, distributing or selling the cartoons, or anything else that might offend, just in case.
Yeah, it has, and you know it has.No it hasn't.
The killer was a refugee so back to Chechnya have fun dodging the HINDS.
Or Sudan Saudi Syria Afghanistan Somali. Glorious peace loving countries where those attitudes are welcome.
Europe doesn't need savages. It's not difficult you don't have to like others you just can't use violence on people who don't agree with you.
Don't like that?
We will comprise you can use violence against those that insult the prophet.
Others can use violence against Muslims oh but wait your a tiny minority, guess you should have gone with the tolerance approach.
Kind of teacher you still remember decades later. Depressing as fuck that she should receive complaints.
Utter bollocks.Yeah, it has, and you know it has.
In mealy mouthed language, but oh boy has it been said over and over.
Lot of telling offs then!Sorry I wasn't clear, I meant i wondered if she had received complaints, i don't know if she did, but I'm wondering now again, reading this, if she did.
My youngest is in year 5 now and they get to watch Newsround in class but are told off if they make 'rude' comments about Donald Trump.
You're not usually one to pretend like this. In fact, this whole demand for nuance isn't like you at all. You know damn well.Utter bollocks.
Have you retained your union membership? One of yours just got killed at/result of work. That would also be a good place to start.
Fair points...but...as stated earlier, the point at which you invite self-exclusion on the basis that offence might result, has the unfortunate consequence of legitimising the religious rule under consideration. Paty's employers should have set the parameters for professional choice of content; if it's not appropriate for all students, it's not appropriate.Yes, they'd share the same less rich experience. Because of leveling down, to accommodate those who are offended that others don't comply with their religious rules! Apparently, an ideal so worthy that, for some here, it justifies tacitly blanming a worker for his own brutal murder by a right-wing extremist.
And showing the images to those who wanted to see them would in no way preclude the sort of discussion you mention.
And you're not usually one to shamefully misrepresent others in order to score cheap, shitty points.You're not usually one to pretend like this. In fact, this whole demand for nuance isn't like you at all. You know damn well.
Another lie.And you're not usually one to shamefully misrepresent others in order to score cheap, shitty points.
Well if you are, I've missed it.Another lie.
I do it all the time! Only on daft threads though.Well if you are, I've missed it.
it's a quiet day at spymaster mansionsYou're not usually one to pretend like this. In fact, this whole demand for nuance isn't like you at all. You know damn well.
there's three certain things in life - death, taxes and spy crashes round like a bull in a china shopI still think it might be a very subtle troll.
Fair points...but...as stated earlier, the point at which you invite self-exclusion on the basis that offence might result, has the unfortunate consequence of legitimising the religious rule under consideration. Paty's employers should have set the parameters for professional choice of content; if it's not appropriate for all students, it's not appropriate.
Fair enough. This is the first time I've noticed you engaging in such dishonesty though.I do it all the time! Only on daft threads though.
That's kind of the point, isn't it?It is a legitimate rule, for those who choose to subscribe to that religion.
It's actually not. I've got shitloads of work I should be doing!it's a quiet day at spymaster mansions
Do you extend that to the teaching of evolution or the carrying out of dissections? Which other things do all students have to miss out on because some students (or, more often, parents) might object?Fair points...but...as stated earlier, the point at which you invite self-exclusion on the basis that offence might result, has the unfortunate consequence of legitimising the religious rule under consideration. Paty's employers should have set the parameters for professional choice of content; if it's not appropriate for all students, it's not appropriate.
Well, me admitting i do it on daft threads and this not being one should give you pause for thought. This teachers has repeatedly been characterised as i suggested - as basically telling muslim pupils that it's tough shit, there's the door. And with no basis for this being presented as fact. You know this. You know how it's been done, you know the language chosen to give that impression. You know how it's been done.Fair enough. This is the first time I've noticed you engaging in such dishonesty though.
That's kind of the point, isn't it?
But it's not leginate to force that rule on others.It is a legitimate rule, for those who choose to subscribe to that religion.
You said "... fuck off and leave the white kids to it".Well, me admitting i do it on daft threads and this not being one should give you pause for thought. This teachers has repeatedly been characterised as i suggested - as basically telling muslim pupils that it's tough shit, there's the door. And with no basis for this being presented as fact. You know this. You know how it's been done, you know the language chosen to give that impression. You know how it's been done.
I think that's an accurate characterisation of the results of what has been repeatedly mealy mouthed here, yes.You said "... fuck off and leave the white kids to it".
Mendacious tosh.
I pretty much agree with Danny. on the actualities of any such lesson approach in this subject, I also think though going out of your way to be unnecessarily provocative is crass and foolish. Not because it risks being beheaded but for practical reasons. You don’t engage people in your ideas, open up discussion by offending them and everything they believe in.
Of course there is a big discussion and one I think that has been unfolding as to where this line is drawn. For some, the mere raising of certain issues may be deemed offensive. They cannot be afforded the moral wait to deny these subjects are discussed.
Lot of telling offs then!
The dialectic in action.Yes! Which of course makes them want to do it more.