Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Terrorist attacks and beheadings in France

I presumed he meant that the teacher would say he going to show the pics, and let parents decide where or not their own kids attend. Rather than giving them a veto on it being shown to anyone.
Yep, no prob, but the idea is that this effects all of society later down the line.
 
That's a difficult one, and will depend on the kids'age and understanding. You run the risk of parched imposing their religion on their kids.

So here we are, at an impasse, but all in agreement that this was an awfully gruesome thing to happen. An appalling thing to happen anywhere, never mind within a community and to happen within a school setting at the age when young people need safety and security in order to properly develop.
 
All it would mean is that Catholic indoctrination would only continue outside of schools, where it happens anyway. You've got a strange definition of suppression.

so what’s the answer to indoctrination within the home setting? How do we monitor that? Copy the DPRK model?
 
When the kids were about 10, a christian fundie acquaintance of mine started moaning and complaining to anyone who'd listen that the school was "forcing homosexuality down the kids' throats". She started a campaign of hatred on social media against certain teachers.

It turned out that the kids had had a class discussion about different types of families.

The school rightly ignored her.

You can't reason with religious nutters.
 
When the kids were about 10, a christian fundie acquaintance of mine started moaning and complaining to anyone who'd listen that the school was "forcing homosexuality down the kids' throats". She started a campaign of hatred on social media against certain teachers.

It turned out that the kids had had a class discussion about different types of families.

The school rightly ignored her.

You can't reason with religious nutters.
you seem to be conflating 'the religious' with 'the mentally ill' which i don't suppose is helpful to either the religious or the mentally ill. or the religious mentally ill.
 
so what’s the answer to indoctrination within the home setting? How do we monitor that? Copy the DPRK model?

Partly by fostering a political and social culture where oppressive religious behaviour gets challenged and then transcended. Something your position is running counter to.
 
you seem to be conflating 'the religious' with 'the mentally ill' which i don't suppose is helpful to either the religious or the mentally ill. or the religious mentally ill.

Well, there's certainly an argument that all extremist religious people are mentally ill.

But this was in response to the argument that if you teach something in a respectful manner, that will appease the bigoted twats. Unfortunately that's not the case.
 
Partly by fostering a political and social culture where oppressive religious behaviour gets challenged and then transcended. Something your position is running counter to.

how to make the distinction between oppressive religious behaviour, conservative religious behaviour, or a loose fitting of religious guidelines for one’s life.

How to make that distinction?
 
Not trolling, but you're right. I'd never have thought that I'd be the one to explain to a bunch of fucking lefties why gratuitously offending a minority may not be the best way to get one's point across.
Here you go again definitely not characterisng the teacher and actions as i suggested. It's pretty much all you've done on the thread - yet you demur?
 
I had a friend at uni, he was heavily into the jihadi stuff. I never challenged him, we just talked about stuff like how it is to be a 3rd generation Bengali Brit. How his family came to be in the UK, and other (rudimentary) political and sociological stuff.

We never had any classes where his beliefs were openly ridiculed, but by the end of uni he’d changed.

there’s more than one way to cut the cake.
 
Not trolling, but you're right. I'd never have thought that I'd be the one to explain to a bunch of fucking lefties why gratuitously offending a minority may not be the best way to get one's point across.

Showing pupils the material that's the subject matter of the discussion isn't gratuitous. Nor was anyone exposed to that material against their will.
 
Not trolling, but you're right. I'd never have thought that I'd be the one to explain to a bunch of fucking lefties why gratuitously offending a minority may not be the best way to get one's point across.
“Gratuitously offending a minority”. That’s your judgement of this guy’s lesson, a lesson you didn’t attend.

I didn’t attend either, but there are lots of ways of offending certain minorities. Just being gay, for one.

It’s not “lefties” who are confused here (whatever that term is intended to encompass here), but blancmange-brained moral relativist appeasers of the reactionary right.
 
I had a friend at uni, he was heavily into the jihadi stuff. I never challenged him, we just talked about stuff like how it is to be a 3rd generation Bengali Brit. How his family came to be in the UK, and other (rudimentary) political and sociological stuff.

We never had any classes where his beliefs were openly ridiculed, but by the end of uni he’d changed.

there’s more than one way to cut the cake.

Nobody is proposing ridiculing anyone.
 
Back
Top Bottom