Seems a bit pointless. It’s currently being refurbed.
PDF you say...?Newsletter for the NHS strikes coming up. PDF link here NHS Strike Newsletter – Whose strike is it? - Angry Workers
View attachment 354948
500 years of Royal Mail under threat. I would have thought the symbolism and opportunity were obvious and attractive.Seems a bit pointless. It’s currently being refurbed.
Will HM withdraw the royal warrant? Some pressure should be applied imo.We're off to Buckingham Palace apparently!
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
"Royal" what does that entail, your majesty?Will HM withdraw the royal warrant? Some pressure should be applied imo.
Thanks Louis MacNeice for your clear suggestions as to how to phrase each letter and what to emphasise, I wouldn't have known what to focus on otherwise.Thanks for the great post scalyboy. With regard specifically to the what can the public do and writing to Thompson, I would suggest three letters/emails (do both and say you're doing both) as follows:
1. To the Delivery Office Manager (DOM) asking where is your post and asking for confirmation that parcels aren't being prioritised over letters as stated by the CEO. Lay it on thick how urgent some post is.
2. To Simon Thompson asking him for written confirmation that parcels aren't being prioritised over letters. Lay it on thick about your concerns over media reports that this is going on.
3. To your MP voicing your concern that the letter post is being deprioritised in direct contradiction to the public statements of Simon Thompson. Lay it on thick that this puts customers and delivery staff in a really awkward position, the former regarding whether they should use the service or not and the latter about what they are supposed to do on a day to day basis.
Copy all three letters to all three people and let them know you have done this. Ask for prompt replies as this is a matter of some urgency and say that you have let your postie know what you are doing.
The letters/emails only need to be a few lines long, but getting a few of those will be noticed by the DOM and the MP; I doubt Thompson would care very much at all unless there were a large number. If you wanted to include copies for board members then it couldn't hurt.
It's not going to turn the world upside down, but every little helps.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
p.s. Oh and obviously encourage other people to do the same.
Apologies for the link but this newspaper is currently the only one reporting the story.
Of course you're right but let's not forget the need for more clichéd rhetorical flourishes in cyberspace.If that bill becomes law the only thing to combat it will be escalation, coordination, militant action - wildcat strikes, sit-ins/occupations of workplaces etc. Hopefully thats what it will lead to, otherwise we're fucked.
Now more than ever militant, autonomous alternatives from below are required. Real resitance to capitalism, and real solidarity.
That newsletter/leaflet is brilliant. Nice one Angry Workers.Newsletter for the NHS strikes coming up. PDF link here NHS Strike Newsletter – Whose strike is it? - Angry Workers
View attachment 354948
also this posted on stramer threadBastards. Driving them into a corner and don't give a shit about the consequences.
Health Secretary won’t hold pay talks with nurses despite offer to pause strike’
The independent and open assemblies in each hospital or department - found this idea interesting but based on what you describe above how much of this is possible ?Fucking RCN turned cowards at last moment and announced that after discussions with management pretty much every department at my Trust is now 'essential' and won't be going on strike the fucking lickspittles. Strike will be barely noticeable now.
I genuinely still don't quite understand just who/what they're talking about when they talk about "hostile" unions. Like, those are workers, the people both parties at least claim to fight for, and will wax lyrical about when it's convenient.
TBF the full quote isI genuinely still don't quite understand just who/what they're talking about when they talk about "hostile" unions. Like, those are workers, the people both parties at least claim to fight for, and will wax lyrical about when it's convenient.
"...the public had sacrificed 'a lot of their lives and liberty' to prevent the NHS from being overwhelmed" - yeah, and have you somehow forgotten who was keeping it going despite being completely underserved and underresourced??!
Absolute, colossal bell ends
Thank you, choir, that concludes today's preaching.
Bah, I even thought, "hey, should you make sure you're not popping off without knowing the full context?", only to then think "nah, it's all there..."TBF the full quote is
"One of the things that I do find frustrating, given that we have committed to more staff, I cannot understand why the BMA is so hostile to the idea that with more staff must come better standards for patients,” he said, accusing the union of “living on a different planet”. "
...this is the Telegraph after all.
But still...
Bastards. Driving them into a corner and don't give a shit about the consequences.
Health Secretary won’t hold pay talks with nurses despite offer to pause strike’
The independent and open assemblies in each hospital or department - found this idea interesting but based on what you describe above how much of this is possible ?
R4's Any Answers (on at the moment) is overwhelmingly behind the various strikes/strikers which is interesting as it's normally very right wing.
In the local government strikes in the 80s , it was one day , two day and then three days strikes, I was still in the SWP. Despite the branch being controlled by the CP and Labour Party, we had built a reasonable network of rank and file shop stewards and activists through sectional disputes, collections for other strikes nationally and locally, anti racist work with the Black Workers Group etc etc. The line was for an all out strike which was imo somewhat optimistic and a bit propagandist but rather get lost in that debate some of us argued and worked for the setting up of a rank and file rally before the official one . At the first, we must have had around 100 attend ( I think some thought it was the official rally) . We built and worked for the two day strike and increased the numbers at the rank and file rallies and began organising proper picketing . For example, we closed the car parks where there had been some scabbing by the managers ( car parks were a big income spinner for the Council). By the time the three day strike started we had over 250 at the rank and file rallies and targeted the weaker sections of the Council,.On the second day of the three day strike some of the Branch officials turned up , and tried to control the meeting. So it was put to the vote who should chair , I was nominated , won the show of hands and we held a good meeting with members asking the officials why they hadn't done this or why didn't they try and do that etc .Honestly.... I think it's a fair few steps above where I think the strikes and people I know are currently. But good to plant the idea there and who knows, things can develop quickly.
The unions involved in the health strikes are pissing a fair number of workers off tbh, especially on the Trust level, my Trust have agreed with the RCN reps that basically not much will be on strike at all, loads has been categorised as 'essential' much more than the initial list of a few places which was critical care units, chemotherapy, dialysis, and some neonatal and paediatric units.
Was the council pretty much a one-union workplace, or did you have the same splits with GMB and so on?In the local government strikes in the 80s , it was one day , two day and then three days strikes, I was still in the SWP. Despite the branch being controlled by the CP and Labour Party, we had built a reasonable network of rank and file shop stewards and activists through sectional disputes, collections for other strikes nationally and locally, anti racist work with the Black Workers Group etc etc. The line was for an all out strike which was imo somewhat optimistic and a bit propagandist but rather get lost in that debate some of us argued and worked for the setting up of a rank and file rally before the official one . At the first, we must have had around 100 attend ( I think some thought it was the official rally) . We built and worked for the two day strike and increased the numbers at the rank and file rallies and began organising proper picketing . For example, we closed the car parks where there had been some scabbing by the managers ( car parks were a big income spinner for the Council). By the time the three day strike started we had over 250 at the rank and file rallies and targeted the weaker sections of the Council,.On the second day of the three day strike some of the Branch officials turned up , and tried to control the meeting. So it was put to the vote who should chair , I was nominated , won the show of hands and we held a good meeting with members asking the officials why they hadn't done this or why didn't they try and do that etc .
The point I'm trying to make is that hard work over a long period of time at the rank and file level , however small and modest, can make a difference and become a bridge between 'ideas' and delivering/achieving the sort of thing that your leaflet is promoting
GMB, NUPE as it was at the time , TGWU , obviously NALGO was the biggest . I'm sure there were some TASS /MFS as well.Was the council pretty much a one-union workplace, or did you have the same splits with GMB and so on?