My title has no random capitals.are these headlines not a little DU-ish? five sentances long and full of random capitals...?
are these headlines not a little DU-ish? five sentances long and full of random capitals...?
I'm sure it's been mentioned elsewhere, but you'll rarely see a roasting so comprehensive.
DU-ish?
Democratic Underground - one of the least user friendly, repetative and tedious political websites you could have the misfortune to visit. for some odd reason people there like to headline their threads or articles in a way beloved of Daily Mail 'writers' and click-bait hacks...
Ah, I've heard of that place. Isn't it a nest of liberals?
Squirm away Morgan, you vile Tory.
Not a fan I take it
My small data allowance precludes watching the whole thing but Im not going to pretend I'm not happy about the big rises to the minimum wage and the tax free allowance.
I can't see how they can be anything other than good news for people near the bottom of the pile.
Source."The UK’s five million lowest-paid employees will gain nothing at all," says Adam Corlett of the Resolution Foundation. Raising the personal allowance is useless for those earning less than £10,600, but much appreciated by the highest earners. Increasing the personal allowance to £12,500 would be worth £28 a year to the poorest 20 per cent of households, but £445 a year to the richest 20 per cent. It is a massive tax cut for the rich masquerading as substantive help for the poorest in society. And increasing tax on the poor is funding it.
Pathetic as it was, I didn't really see her getting a roasting or being destroyed
I aint watching it again though tbf !
Most agencies calculate tax weekly so the allowance rise means you are much less likely to pay tax each week.
But yeah, it doesn't benefit the very poorest, or those that can't get a full weeks work....
I wouldn't claim to be in the bottom 10% by the way, maybe in the 10percent above that.
I can't see how they can be anything other than good news for people near the bottom of the pile.
You mean being DESTROYED.
I can't see how they can be anything other than good news for people near the bottom of the pile.
I'm sure it's been mentioned elsewhere, but you'll rarely see a roasting so comprehensive.
Squirm away Morgan, you vile Tory. You won't be around for long.
I really hope not.Am I right in assuming they are going ahead with the £30.00 a week cut in ESA?
If you define "highest earners" as "richest 20%" then this is true. If you are talking about the very highest earners, however, it is worth bearing in mind that the very richest 2% earn more than £100,000, which is the point that you start to lose your personal allowance. For this very richest band, increasing the personal allowance thus does not help them at all.Source.Raising the personal allowance is useless for those earning less than £10,600, but much appreciated by the highest earners. Increasing the personal allowance to £12,500 would be worth £28 a year to the poorest 20 per cent of households, but £445 a year to the richest 20 per cent.
You're not happy about the minimum wage increase? Why's that then? Do you earn anywhere near the minimum wage?My small data allowance precludes watching the whole thing but Im not going to pretend I'm not happy about the big rises to the minimum wage and the tax free allowance..
Sorry Editor you've miss read that. To be fair I was using a double negative.You're not happy about the minimum wage increase? Why's that then? Do you earn anywhere near the minimum wage?
A confusing one at that!Sorry Editor you've miss read that. To be fair I was using a double negative.