New Zealand has a population of less than 5 million and they seem to rub along ok.FFS India has a population of over a billion and a quarter, Pakistan has a population of 821m. Bangladesh the smallest fragment of the disintegration of what was India, has a population of 156m, nearly three times that of the UK.
Scotland has a population of just over 5m, and is not a viable nation on its own. Well, not if you want to have exotic things like schools, roads etc.
Scotland has a population of just over 5m, and is not a viable nation on its own. Well, not if you want to have exotic things like schools, roads etc.
'the destroyers'
Switzerland is a high added value economy, Scotland is not.I'll bugger off to live with my Aunty in Switzerland. It must be those extra 3 million there that make it so viable over Scotland.
New Zealand has a population of less than 5 million and they seem to rub along ok.
Didn't they have to dismantle their welfare state and disbanded the military?
Edit. Here we go. Something for the Tories to aspire to
What happens when you scrap the welfare state?: New Zealand has, and
300,000 in Iceland.
But Scots are incapable of looking after their own affairs, according to some (unionists). The only people that couldn't run their own country.
Anyway...I'm sure Khan's comments will be reflected in the upcoming local elections.
Scotland doesn't have any borrowing powers Sas, how does that work? And it has no input into the Budget or UK policy. But apart from that show me a country that doesn't have debt...the difference is that we don't get to pick ours, we get told.Scotland spends more than it earns at the moment, and little sign of that changing.
Didn't they have to dismantle their welfare state and disbanded the military?
Edit. Here we go. Something for the Tories to aspire to
What happens when you scrap the welfare state?: New Zealand has, and