Wouldn't have mattered .Anyone who is black but doesn't have views that doesnt fit with the Guardians idea of what black people should be thinking isn't properly black.
I'm not qualified to comment on that, really.
But Claire Heuchan seems to be some kind of Ph.D. student expert in racism (Stirling University), and I suppose it was convenient for her to change the discussion into one that involves issues that she probably address often.
However, Sadiq Khan's speech seem less intent on telling Scotland that we're horribly racist against people of colour, than on telling us that we want to be horrible to everyone English.
There’s no difference between those who try to divide us on the basis of whether we’re English or Scottish and those who try to divide us on the basis of our background, race or religion.
He is so very much missing the point, that - oh it has been said already - I have to wonder if it is only incompetence.
The Labour Party used to be able to rely on a big majority of seats in Scotland, but people sort of noticed that Scotland voting Labour didn't stop us getting Tory governments anyway, so it's a bit distressing for the Labour Party not to have that any more.
Slight tangent - I saw a small rumour on Twitter that the speech was written by Anas Sarwar, who might, I suppose, have his own reasons for finding it ok to let this completely overshadow the whole conference and render anything Kezia Dugdale had to say completely unnoticeable.
But a twittery rumour doesn't carry any weight, and I'm not sure why Sarwar would want Dugdale's job right now. I suppose, if the May elections don't go well for Labour, he might fancy being leader and that he will somehow be the saviour of the party and the Union.
Sort of like Jim Murphy, who did so well.