Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Saddam Hussein visited by wife...

Jazzz

the truth don't care
Banned
...and guess what happened?

Last week, American authorities arranged a meeting of the former Iraqi dictator with his wife.

She was the first of Hussein"s relatives to meet with the ex-leader of Iraq at a new place, at the American military base in Qatar. Accompanied by Sheikh Hamad Al-Tani, Sajida Heiralla Tuffah has arrived from Syria on his private jet in the end of March.

The outcome of their meeting turned out to be quite scandalous. Sajina claims that the person she encountered was not her husband, but his double. If someone were to say for sure that it was not insinuation, it would have been easy to believe the wife with a 25-year experience. It is also possible to assume that Saddam has simply changed since the day of his sons' deaths, June 24 2003. This however is highly unlikely. In case we believe Hussein"s wife, all DNA testing of the ex-Iraqi leader should be considered a mere fake. Overall, today there remain more questions then there are answers.

Saddam's wife could not recognize her husband
 
Sounds dodgy mate!

If it weren't SH they had, why would the americans arrange for his wife to meet a double? I know they have a propensity towards stupidity, but...

And if they don't have SH, surely the wife would know where the man himself is?
 
From the site that brings you
"Russians conquered Mars 30 years ago"
"Alien visits Russian province"
and
"Jesus Christ born in Ukraine"

c'mon Jazzz :p
 
Could it be that the wife was something of a harridan causing Saddam to palm her off early on so that it was the double that she'd spent all those years living with and that the real Saddam, now a prisoner of the Coalition, is, in reality, a total stranger to her. What do think, Dr.Jazzz?
 
Bonfirelight said:
From the site that brings you
"Russians conquered Mars 30 years ago"
"Alien visits Russian province"
and
"Jesus Christ born in Ukraine"

c'mon Jazzz :p

...what the fuck are you on about?

Admittedly Pravda did run some unusual stories before the Iraq war such as 'evidence of WMD a sham', 'Colin Powell talks bollocks before the UN' (I forget the exact headlines).
 
Lock&Light said:
Could it be that the wife was something of a harridan causing Saddam to palm her off early on so that it was the double that she'd spent all those years living with and that the real Saddam, now a prisoner of the Coalition, is, in reality, a total stranger to her. What do think, Dr.Jazzz?

I think you are talking crap.
 
DrJazzz said:
I think you are talking crap.

Like you I find my little scenario totally unbelievable and, indeed, crap.

It's your postings which create the differences in our thinking.
 
Barking_Mad said:
Its on Pravda's web site.........highly unreliable.

Unreliable because Pravda hasn't been fitting in with the scheme of lies and censorship perpetrated by our Mickey Mouse media, or did you not see the astonishingly accurate articles on Pravda before the start of the Iraq war? (many articles on how the evidence of WMD was bollocks, military analysts saying it would be a long campaign (everyone now forgets how the rest of the media was predicting weeks) and lead to the complete turning over of the country).

trylo I think you are looking for the 'let's stick our heads in the sand' button. :rolleyes:
 
DrJazzz said:
(many articles on how the evidence of WMD was bollocks, military analysts saying it would be a long campaign (everyone now forgets how the rest of the media was predicting weeks) and lead to the complete turning over of the country)
What, and those were exclusive to Pravda, were they? Loads of papers and sources were saying precisely those things all around the world.
 
DrJazz, it's not really that I want to stick my head in the sand it's that if one, especially one coming from a political science background, wants to analyse politics and make meaningful conclusions one has to disregard conspiracy theories because they make analysis possible.

To use a poor analogy, my attitude towards conspiracy theories which obviously interest you very much is a bit like the cosmologist towards religion. I'm not going to say it's impossible that your theories are true, but if you factor them into the equation than just about anything could be true and then you can't come to any fact-based conclusions, it's just a mishmash of hearsay and faith.

Conspiracy theories and bogeyman stories could be true, but I can't make a living off of doing conspiracy analysis for a think tank, private company or government agency can I?
 
DrJazzz said:
...what the fuck are you on about?

this
24.gif

and this
113.gif

and this
165.gif

are what the fuck im talking about.
Just seems like the sort of stories rolled out by those dollar rags you get in the states..
 
Sabah el khir, Dr.J
Assuming this was the real Mrs.Hussein, there seem to have been more looky-likeys in Iraq than a Stars in Their Eyes Christmas special - then wouldn't you expect her to deny it was the old monster himself in the hope of getting him released as a mere looky-likey. It can get very confusing with all this bluff and counter bluff.*
Bisalama
 
Fair enough BonfireLight, I apologise for being rude.

However if you read "Jesus Christ born in Ukraine" and "Mars conquered thirty years ago" they turn out to be stories containing nothing remarkable. I'll accept there may be the odd fanciful article but the bulk of Pravda is serious news, and indeed www.iraqwar.ru was the best commentary on the Iraq war by any mainstream media.
 
fela fan said:
If it weren't SH they had, why would the americans arrange for his wife to meet a double? I know they have a propensity towards stupidity, but...

And if they don't have SH, surely the wife would know where the man himself is?


These are very important questions which need answers.

I don't have an answer to why the wife thought it wasn't Saddam because I don't have an answer to these.

The wife not recognising Saddam - is this reported anywhere else?
 
Just out of interest, can someone explain why we're supposed to believe (a) that the Saddam in custody is not the real one (b) that the US govt is scared of releasing him for trial because of what he might say about US-Iraq weapons links in the 80s, among other things.

That is, why would the US govt capture a fake Saddam only to be scared of what he might say?
 
Dirty Martini said:
That is, why would the US govt capture a fake Saddam only to be scared of what he might say?
A fake Saddam would presumably be unlikely to reveal anything that the US govt would regret - which would probably make him an ideal defendant in any forthcoming trial, and any supposed 'fear' of what he might reveal could merely be window-dressing ...but maybe not! ;)

I understand that Saddam had many doubles (didn't he also have many wives?), but I doubt if the doubles would have further wives of their own - though they could, couldn't they? It certainly would make the doubles more convincing if they each married wives who could then swear blind that they'd married the real Saddam. ;) ;)

That's the thing about intregue - with bluff and doublebluff and doubledoublebluff etc etc - one thing alone is for sure: truth is often stranger than fiction! :p
 
Well of course this was something that crossed a lot of peoples minds when he was captured. So it may be true.

On a seperate issue, has garfield been banned? I just saw it on this thread and was a wee bit suprised.
 
I think he's just set it as his 'location' - but you never can tell with this pesky interwebnet thing..!
 
She (Saddam's wife) has received letters from Saddam and not once did she express any doubts that it was him then.

So I think it's rather odd that suddenly she now has doubts. Very odd indeed. In fact quite likely that someone is telling porkies.
 
Back
Top Bottom