Organisers are seeking approval from Lambeth for an open-access, “performance-led pop-up” called the Open Arms occupying Ruskin Park Bandstand for 5 afternoons and evenings a week from 29th April to 12th September 2021, Covid restrictions permitting.
“With a Culture Recovery Grant, they will be looking to celebrate and support the rich pool of talent living within the borough. They will provide a stage for local performance in the midst of rapid venue closures. Alongside a food and beverage offer.”
I think folks should take heed of what's happened in Brockwell park where we end up with steel walls and things. It's an important matter of principle that public parks aren't assets to be sweated for (probably minimal) cash. The past year has made clear how valuable public open spaces are.Yeah that seems over the top.
Which part, the music bit or the pub-in-the-park bit?I think it could have been fun.Open Arms event will not go ahead – Friends of Ruskin Park
www.friendsofruskinpark.org.uk
Which part, the music bit or the pub-in-the-park bit?
I think there will still be some music events like there usually are, but they won't be encircled by a commercial drinking operation which is not really what public parks are supposed to be for. And presumably any pubs that have outdoor areas will be looking to get as much custom as they can this summer, in an attempt to survive.
I really liked the idea of people being able to watch live music in the park - after all, it's what bandstands were built for - but I think 5 days a week for five months was really too much.Both the music and the pub in the park bits. As a soon-to-be father, it would have been really nice to be able to get my friends over to Ruskin and be able to sit outside with our baby and have a few drinks and listen to some music. It's exactly what public parks are for, it would only have been a tiny part of the park. What do you think public parks are for?
And I don't think the pubs with gardens are going to be struggling to pull in punters this summer.
You'll still be able to do all of that won't you? No one is going to stop you bringing picnics and drinks in.Both the music and the pub in the park bits. As a soon-to-be father, it would have been really nice to be able to get my friends over to Ruskin and be able to sit outside with our baby and have a few drinks and listen to some music. It's exactly what public parks are for, it would only have been a tiny part of the park. What do you think public parks are for?
And I don't think the pubs with gardens are going to be struggling to pull in punters this summer.
You'll still be able to do all of that won't you? No one is going to stop you bringing picnics and drinks in.
There might be a less intensive programme of music on offer but there's quite often stuff going on at the bandstand, some of it formally organised and some of it impromptu. Sat around there having picnics several times last summer with various bands doing stuff in the bandstand.
The proposal was for something that would have set up a load of food and drink huts, portaloos and so on, on the grassy areas around the bandstand. And it would inevitably have attracted an additional load of people who might otherwise be spending their time in a pub garden. That is, additional to the people who regularly use the park and live in the surrounding area. Like most parks it's already suffering from unusually intensive use. I think we'd have ended up with a large area of completely trampled ground around the bandstand which would then take a long time to recover.
Something that just went on for one weekend or so would have been different. But this was proposed to be there for months on end. It's basically handing over public space for someone to build a temporary pub on and make a load of cash from it. The park, including the existing life around the bandstand, is already enjoyed by lots of people. This wasn't bringing anything of benefit to people that use the park regularly and for whom it provides local amenity space.
I never realised that part.It was also going to be fenced off and ticketed, so was privatizing public space.
You may want to use the plan that was submitted by the Open Arms on 26 February for permission, rather than the one dated 16 Feb which you've pasted from above. It's a bigger foot print and therefore begins to encroach further into the park.No it wasn't going to be ticketed, of course anyone would be against it if that was the case.
And you're being dramatic about the amount of space:
View attachment 263428
But it was a battle to create culture!pet project.
The kind you find on a petri dishBut it was a battle to create culture!
Smells like Brixton Project-style