Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Roosh V, Pro-Rape Pick Up Artist, Announces Worldwide 'Tribal Meetings'

The problem is twats will actually try this "game" approach in real life:facepalm: then get even more bitter and twisted when it doesnt work


pretty much.


you get the idiots who try this stuff. and when it dosen't work, there's got to be something wrong. and of course, there's nothing wrong with the hack. you just have to say the right stuff and behave in the right way and anyone can get any woman they want. so when it dosne't work, there's only one place to out blame. there's got to be something wrong with women.
 
I certainly don't . Some woman's dying of cancer , and ...she must absolutely do this before she dies because its so important...yknow..him fucking as many women as possible compared to her mere cancer...she calls him to her deathbed ..to reveal the ten ..yes ten..sacred secrets of the sisterhood . Like some old fucking crusty pirate telling someone where the treasure map is. Because shes consumed by guilt at all the ruses all women use to mess men about . Them being all exactly the same....all these women.who learned their wily evil ways in hitler slut ninja school or wherever . By the sounds of his description of their wrongness .

But the guilt finally got to her in the end, so she spilled the beans to him . Like Jack Palance and Curlys gold


What a complete load of old bollocks . He's a massive bullshitter and anyone taking his advice is a fucking clown .
the protocols of the elders of woman
 
<...>
Sorry, I got raged at page 15 and had to skip so I may have missed you seeing the light.
No you didn't. You missed him doing his usual trick of shitting all over a thread and being an all-purpose windup merchant. Up until fridgemagnet warned him off.
 
He's just got a ring binder with 'THE TRUTH' tippexed on the front. He writes inside using green pen.
A binder full of women.

romney-glove.jpg


Did you know that phil loves to snap on the latex?
 
Some men don't like women, but they like fucking them.That isn't what I agree with, but it makes sense to me, cos the man gets off and he feels like he has got one over on the woman.
Mind having said that, there are plenty women who say "I've had him", or "I've been there" in response to discussing men, so both men and women are more bothered about momentary sensury pleasure than deep and meaningful love. This roosh character wants to portray sex as hate-fucking rather than love making.
 
Women gaining custody of kids is a go-to argument of MRA types.

Hmm, what possible structural reason might there be for women being seen as natural care-givers?

Oh wait, I know this one!! Patriarchy!!
Also, a recent study has showed that there is no gender bias in the UK family court system - there was a similar success rate for mothers and fathers applying for residence orders, and fathers applying for contact were overly successful. This article gives an explanation as to why men may still perceive a bias - they apply for the vast majority of orders "to initiate or restart contact" - however some of the reason fathers lose contact in the first place are down to a lack of parenting involvement before the split - leading to poor attachment between father and child. They quote a study which shows that "being a more involved dad (changing nappies, putting the child to bed, reading and playing with them) prior to separation… was linked to more frequent contact and increased overnight stays, particularly where the father had looked after the child by himself." This article, dealing with the US system also points to why mothers are more likely to have custody of children - in the vast majority of cases men don't seek custody or greater contact, and both during a relationship and after relationship breakdown, men do less childcare than women.

Also, the study of the UK family courts found that in some cases the default to equal or near equal custody was working against the welfare of the child. There is also evidence that contact decisions where there is known domestic violence do not always put the needs of the child first: women's aid currently have a campaign based on the 19 children during 10 years killed during contact arrangements by parents who were prior perpetrators of domestic abuse (in all cases the perpetrator was the father).
 
When the jazz singer George Melly was on BBC Radio in 1989 he quoted a ‘Greek philosopher’ [Socrates] who, on being asked if he was upset at losing his sexual appetite, replied: ‘Upset, certainly not. It’s like being unchained from a lunatic.’

Perhaps that's what poor Roosh needs, a surgical mercy so he can finally live his life free of that relentless monkey on his back, able to see the world anew, no more hate and frustration... peace, compassion, blue skies, a new day now that the rain has gone etc.
 
Perhaps that's what poor Roosh needs, a surgical mercy so he can finally live his life free of that relentless monkey on his back, able to see the world anew, no more hate and frustration... peace, compassion, blue skies, a new day etc.
fuck surgical mercy, what he needs is a shot from a tokarev in the back of his neck. after he's dug his own grave, of course.
 
From the comments sections, it seems the site is now being trolled by Stormfront and other racists. lol. They're perfect for each other. It's really funny that the Rooshies don't see the irony

That makes a change!

From what I've seen, PUA/MRA-type sites and far right/fash seem to be made for each other and you often see them openly using fash usernames/iconography and propounding their way as one of the routes to Alphaness/being irresistable etc.

Another thing I've noticed is that their approach to newbies in that arena is remarkably similar to the "First we break them - then re-make them exactly as we want them" mantra of the SS trainers.

So if Fash are trolling Roosh, IMO its only because it serves their agenda in some other way, not out of any great ideological differences or respect for womens equality.
 
Also, a recent study has showed that there is no gender bias in the UK family court system - there was a similar success rate for mothers and fathers applying for residence orders, and fathers applying for contact were overly successful. This article gives an explanation as to why men may still perceive a bias - they apply for the vast majority of orders "to initiate or restart contact" - however some of the reason fathers lose contact in the first place are down to a lack of parenting involvement before the split - leading to poor attachment between father and child. They quote a study which shows that "being a more involved dad (changing nappies, putting the child to bed, reading and playing with them) prior to separation… was linked to more frequent contact and increased overnight stays, particularly where the father had looked after the child by himself." This article, dealing with the US system also points to why mothers are more likely to have custody of children - in the vast majority of cases men don't seek custody or greater contact, and both during a relationship and after relationship breakdown, men do less childcare than women.

Also, the study of the UK family courts found that in some cases the default to equal or near equal custody was working against the welfare of the child. There is also evidence that contact decisions where there is known domestic violence do not always put the needs of the child first: women's aid currently have a campaign based on the 19 children during 10 years killed during contact arrangements by parents who were prior perpetrators of domestic abuse (in all cases the perpetrator was the father).

I had seen similar reports about the US system, but wasn't certain if it was the same over here, which is why I didn't mention it was a falsity anyway.

It seems self-evident, that if custody is meant to be based on what is best for the child, then the parent who has previously given the most/best care will be looked at to provide a continuation of that care post-split. And, as per my previous sarcastic post, thanks to caring, sharing patriarchy it's women who end up disproportionately being responsible for a child's care (for a multitude of reasons, many of which differ within relationships).
 
That makes a change!

From what I've seen, PUA/MRA-type sites and far right/fash seem to be made for each other and you often see them openly using fash usernames/iconography and propounding their way as one of the routes to Alphaness/being irresistable etc.

Another thing I've noticed is that their approach to newbies in that arena is remarkably similar to the "First we break them - then re-make them exactly as we want them" mantra of the SS trainers.

So if Fash are trolling Roosh, IMO its only because it serves their agenda in some other way, not out of any great ideological differences or respect for womens equality.

Yeah, didn't the EDL say they were going to go along to some of his proposed meet ups and tell them to fuck off?

It smells of "we'll be the ones to control our women, thank you very much."
 
That makes a change!

From what I've seen, PUA/MRA-type sites and far right/fash seem to be made for each other and you often see them openly using fash usernames/iconography and propounding their way as one of the routes to Alphaness/being irresistable etc.

Another thing I've noticed is that their approach to newbies in that arena is remarkably similar to the "First we break them - then re-make them exactly as we want them" mantra of the SS trainers.

So if Fash are trolling Roosh, IMO its only because it serves their agenda in some other way, not out of any great ideological differences or respect for womens equality.

to explain more fully, the Stormfront guys are there basically to offer support but to also explain to the PUA's that they're not racist enough. And the PUA's are all "who let these psychos in?" not realizing that they sound just as psycho to the rest of the world. It's hilarious
 
I would settle for a rusty pair of pliers and a blunt tin opener tbh.
Oh bugger yes, it's what him and his ilk need,not oodles of introspection and long winded interpretation, he's a ( and I hate using this word, a total cunt) that needs neutered or sectioned.
Preferably both.
 
That could be a whole other thread, but I'd hope that people on all sides of that debate would agree that sex workers shouldn't be seen as society's safety valve for angry misogynists.


this.

prostitution is a really, really divisive topic.

what is important is that both sides want to reduce harm to sex workers and women in general. and whatever someone thinks of prostitution, aiming a bunch of deeply hateful men at sex workers and telling them they have a right to go see those women and put them in danger, to reduce the danger they pose to 'proper women' is an utterly horiffic idea and is about as far away from reducing harm to sex workers and to women as you can get
 
Back
Top Bottom