Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Roger Waters self indulgent twat / not self indulgent twat

Water's is...


  • Total voters
    53
There is a difference between using a word in written form and using it in speech. in redcogs heights Mrs rc will become irate if c word is used as an expletive because it links female genitals to factors negative and derogatory, thus degrading women. Speech matters as we know. In print (on a forum for eg) or in a book the term is essential (imv) and 'free speech' demands its continued use. What would Chatterley (and many other works of literature) be without the erotic charge of cunt? Exceptions abound though. In extreme anger i think its probably ok. Waters aint a cunt.
 
Last edited:
There's a thread about violence against women, and once upon a time I suggested that it wasn't a good look to call a female poster a cunt, on that particular thread. It was explicitly limited to that context, i think thats clear. It certainly wasn't a general "don't call a woman a cunt ever" - that was a little strawman that came up later, and not from me.

That's it. It wasn't how it's being painted now.

That’s not the thread I was taking about AFAIR but I’m not massively bothered either way. Just confirming krtek’s post that there was a discussion and my personal reaction to that discussion. Everyone else can keep on doing whatever they want, I don’t make the rules.
 
Didn't realise he'd gone Grayzone but can't say I'm surprised. He probably still has a point about the Venezuela thing though.
 
We don't need no education
We don't need no nuanced takes on the realpolitik of the relations between a sovereign nation and an imperialist capitalist gangster bent on his own enrichment at the expense of the working class.
 
Roger Waters in need of education and thought control in the opinion of Iran's Pinky and Perky.

 
This may well have been mentioned in the thread already, apologies if repeating something but was reading this interesting article about how the UN, particularly the security council, is losing its power, and being superseded by groupings such as BRICS and the G20.
But this bit stood out - supposedly Roger Waters spoke at the the UN about the invasion of Ukraine at the invitation of the Russian delegation!! What a tool...

"But western officials are deeply frustrated by the paralysis of the Security Council, and in particular by what they see as the obstructionism of Russian officials aimed at undermining its role.

They highlight how traditionally Russia never wanted to give civil society much access to Security Council debates but since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine has invited dozens of outside figures to speak about the war — including Roger Waters, the former Pink Floyd bassist, who accuses the west of provoking the invasion.

“They are degrading the level of debate in the Security Council by inviting unqualified briefers and conspiracy theorists who make the debate look like a circus,” said one western diplomat. “It makes an onlooker think it’s not worth listening to.”
 
Great review here:

I must listen to the original. It’s about time I guess. I know I’ll hate it though, so maybe I shouldn’t bother. Pink Floyd are one of those bands you don’t need to hear without judging them and their output. I know instinctively that they are excrementally poor.
 
Great review here:

I must listen to the original. It’s about time I guess. I know I’ll hate it though, so maybe I shouldn’t bother. Pink Floyd are one of those bands you don’t need to hear without judging them and their output. I know instinctively that they are excrementally poor.
“Have you ever listened to an audiobook through one device with Radio 3's Night Tracks playing simultaneously on another? It's not as good as that”.

🤣🤣🤣
 
“Have you ever listened to an audiobook through one device with Radio 3's Night Tracks playing simultaneously on another? It's not as good as that”.

🤣🤣🤣
Fucking hell it is exactly like this.

Even if you hate Pink Floyd, as it’s traditionally very popular to on this forum, DSOTM has sold 45 million copies, and for many of those still bears repeat listens.

This would struggle to sell 45 copies and a single listen feels one like too many so far
 
Last edited:
Fucking hell it is exactly like this.

Even if you hate Pink Floyd, as it’s traditionally very popular to on this forum, DSOTM has sold 45 million copies, and for many of those still bears repeat listens.

This would struggle to sell 45 copies and a single listen feels one like too many so far
I heard he'd redone the album and assumed it was some kind of note for note remake and he'd just wanted to replace all those second class citizens who used to make up his retinue, aka Pink Floyd. I've just managed 5 minutes of the remade album and realised it's, well, how the fuck to describe it? Fucking awful, certainly, but beyond that... :eek: He claims he was the dominant voice in the original album and so, if that's true, he's laying down some kind of sub-lounge lizard vocals on top of it... I know, I know, he thinks he's a genius, ha ha... In his hubris he's shitting on his own creation.
 
Back
Top Bottom