Gramsci
Well-Known Member
Reclaim These Streets | Bindmans
Bindmans LLP act for a group of women from London who came together following suspected homicide of Sarah Everard, to plan a vigil on Clapham Common
www.bindmans.com
Here is Bindmans webpage- they worked for the Vigil organisers against the Met.
It contains pdf of the submssion to the Judge.
What is interesting is that initially - from emails that Bindmans have in the pdf - that local police were prepared to work with the organisers. Two of the organisers were local Cllrs. Lambeth Council ( Clapham Common is in Lambeth) supported idea of a vigil. Lambeth Council were prepared to help. So looks to me this could have been well organised one hour vigil with social distancing.
It was only later the Met said no.
On the blanket ban on Protest. In front of Judge the Met legal team said was not the case. Which tbf I find contradictory. As it is clear that is what they told organisers.
Bindman argue that the Human Rights Acts ( which protects freedom of expression and assembly) is primary legislation and that secondary legislation like the Covid legislation has to be compatible with it. HRA comes first.
So under the covid legislation of reasonable excuse the Met could have allowed a vigil. The HRA rights come first.
Its an important argument. Looking at the HRA excerpts in Bindmans pdf and the whole point of the HRA is to enshrine rights of individual against the state. The judgement call is to err in favour of peaceful protest. Its important part of democracy.
The pandemic is testing these important principles.
Last edited: