two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
Nope, not noticed the squirrels. What are they doing?
Rfid tags in texas school boycotted due to religious beliefs
- Thread starter likesfish
- Start date
Nope, not noticed the squirrels. What are they doing?
Increasingly eratic behavior. If your not doing anything this weekend, go and watch some in your local park. Youll be shocked. Im suprised the RSPCA arent doing something as there very obviously in a lot of distress.
such as what? CCTV?
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
I see them quite regularly in the woods as they are my dog's favourite pursuit. Not noticed any erratic behaviour - what sort of things though?
1%er
Well-Known Member
I asked you two questions, will you answer them? Answering a question with a question isn't the way to hold a conversation
Let me rephrase them:
Do "they" implant RFID chips into people and do you believe that RFID is the best way to track people
1%er
Well-Known Member
If they can watch me why do they need RFID chips?
Lots. Most recent example - I saw 1 yesterday in the garden spinning round and round as if trying to escape from something invisibel.
Radio frequencies can do more than just FOLLOW you...
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
My dog does that!
The only squirrels I see are travelling in straight lines at speed trying to escape from the dog.
1%er
Well-Known Member
When I was a kid I had a rabbit and he did that just before he died, that's a true story.
1%er
Well-Known Member
Tell me more please?
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
1) Very little that can be statistically shown, although there's plenty of anecdote.
2) Because they're watching for it?
1%er
Well-Known Member
They look very sad, I wonder what has upset them
BTW do you have two sheds, I could have a case of shed envy
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
NLP is an even worse programming language for the human brain than Visual Basic is for Windows.
two sheds
Least noticed poster 2007
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Consent.
First you'd need to manufacture a whole world's worth of reasons, justifications and excuses as to why "chipping" people compulsorily would be "the right thing", then you'd need to legislate it, legislate penalties for removal and/or masking (amazingly simple to do with RFID tags, potential library book thieves!) and construct the infrastructure to put the tags into the public worldwide, as well as the infrastructure to monitor everyone, remove deaders from the database, and enter new arrivals onto the database.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
If only it were technical, I wouldn't mind, but it's more nutbaggery. Y2K is something you don't want to search CT sites about. There are many more than 2K CTs about the significance of Y2K, and most of them are totally Upminster!
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
First step
Not very handy in a culture that doesn't require the carrying of an identity document.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I sold mine to some geezer called "Crusher" down the pub.
1%er
Well-Known Member
But "they" will have seen you do that
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
All animals are sensitive to certain frequencies of radio waves. Unfortunately for your premise, most satellites that aren't used for TV or other commercial broadcasting use signals that don't use those wavelengths that affect animals because they're not narrow enough.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Such as using an active tracking device that broadcasts a signal, as opposed to one that needs to pass a reading device (and to pass it within certain speed and distance parameters). The whole thing with RFID is that it's passive, not active. It's like a barcode: it's there, but it does nothing until a scanner of the right sort scans it for the information imprinted on it - for a barcode, that's item type and price, for an RFID tag, it's "this tag relates to XXXX XXXXX" to which the scanner attaches the computer equivalent of "who has just passed Harrods, Knightsbridge".
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
1%er
Well-Known Member
Don't tell him that until he tells us if he thinks its the best way
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Sorry!
Right.
So, there are two key ways in which you might gain the consent to do something regarded as unpalatable.
The first, is the Hegelian Dialectic (renamed by Icke as Problem-Reaction-Solution). This involves covertly creating a problem, then offering your unpalatable thing as the solution to the problem you created in the first place. See - Al Qaeda, which remains CIA creation.
The second is the stepping-stone approach. It's too much to start microchipping everyone - we aren't going to take it. So you start off bit by bit. Biometrics in passports. National ID register (nearly flew). RFID tags for students. Students particularly good because they will grow up thinking it's normal, so you get the new generation. Criminals. Children. People likely to need medical attention. Then once you have large sections of society already using things, so much easier to make it universal.
Regarding the RFID chips in the case being passive, don't think for an instant that that means future chips are being limited to being passive. What they are looking for is to successfully introduce tagging to the school - using active chips will cost more, might potentially be less reliable, and perhaps more likely to give students the jitters.
This is all happening.
Similar threads
