In Iraq and in Gaza, victory is inevitable.
I get Gaza but what would be victory in Iraq?
In Iraq and in Gaza, victory is inevitable.
I get Gaza but what would be victory in Iraq?
What a massive prThe destruction of the fascist
sectarian Maliki dictatorship. will result in a magnificent defeat of imperialism on a regional and world sc
PR?
What a massive victory for the people who are being brutalized and murdered in Iraq.
Zionist scumbags, infected by the propaganda of the Maliki regime.
Who? I'm too thick perhaps to get which zionist scumbags are being infected by Maliki's lot. Are you proposing ethnic cleansing of the Shia?
It's a pisstake, right?
...It's a pisstake, right?
[Butchersapron, post: 13329623, member: 366"]He just wants attention. Fake character. Waste of time.
MellySingsDoom said:All nationalism is a worthless concept, so should be opposed. So there!
I'd agree that the Kurdish regime is compromised with Israel and that Maliki is a cunt but what about the "Islamic State"?
The US, the Uk and even the EU have supported replacing Maliki, what's your problem?All of those westerners, quietly oropenly supporting the fascist dictatorship of Nouri al Maliki as his government engages a program of sectarian genocide.
The IDF infiltrated the Kurdish forces long ago.
No.
Yeah, long live imperialism, and deny the identity of the oppressed nations - according to this mentality, anyway
The Islamic State are an extremist group. Until recently they were part of an alliance, uniting the vast majority of Iraqis who are brutaluzed by the sectarian Shiite regime. The Iraqi, even many Shia, are opposed to the criminal, Maliki regime. All of the resistance is labelled as IS as part of a propagandist campaign orchestrated by the Maliki dictatorship, Tehran, Obama and Russia
Yeah, long live imperialism, and deny the identity of the oppressed nations - according to this mentality, anywaya
The US, the Uk and even the EU have supported replacing Maliki, what's your problem?
They say that they want to change the figurehead, even as they still supply him with weapons, as he id committing atrocities, deliberately bombing civilians.
Lovely concept, unfortunately will only happen once we are extinctAhem, not supporting nationalism does not equate to wanting imperialism. BTW, imperialism=nationalism with added irredentism.
Ever heard of wanting a world without nation states or borders?
Try again.
They say that they want to change the figurehead, even as they still supply him with weapons, as he id committing atrocities, deliberately bombing civilians.
Ahem, not supporting nationalism does not equate to wanting imperialism. BTW, imperialism=nationalism with added irredentism.
Ever heard of wanting a world without nation states or borders?
Try again.
as much as I want a borderless utopia we live in a world system that reproduces capitalist domination on a global as well as national scale.
realpolitik.
Even, imperialism, supporting a sectarian dictatorship.
Not by any measure, but."....I think perhaps most involved in his 'removal' would in hindsight , perhaps would have thought it through a bit more?So by simply reproducing nationalism, which perfectly fits within a capitalist hegemony, you feel this is a solution to....what? Was Saddam Hussein's Iraq a "success"?
Not by any measure, but."....I think perhaps most involved in his 'removal' would in hindsight , perhaps would have thought it through a bit more?
So by reproducing nationalism, which perfectly fits within a capitalist hegemony, you feel this is a solution to....what? Was Saddam Hussein's Iraq a "success"?
The moon is big tonight.