Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Rape, sexual assault and harassment in the entertainment industry

Women's voices being shouted down if they deviate from the official 'grab yer pitchforks' party line seems to be a common problem. If anything I'd say you're more likely to become the latest victim of a twitter pile-on as a woman calling for moderation than as a man openly defending abusers.

Assault is not a feeling. The Aziz Ansari story shows why language matters | Tiffany Wright

...this woman makes the point that many people started attacking her after only reading two tweets from a long thread. There's an attention span issue here I think, where ideas being reduced to tweets or clickbait headlines leads people to see everything as highly polarised between good and evil.

I don't think this rush to anger helps victims of abuse, and I don't think it helps men analyse and change their own behaviour. I hate to mention it but Aziz Ansari dealt with this on his own TV show, with his character being pilloried because of his association with someone who later turned out to be a creepy cunt. It was all done a bit ham-fistedly but there was at least an attempt there to look at the dynamics of these public exposure situations without discrediting victims or letting men off the hook.

Even now I'm trying to find a form of words that can't be misread as a defence of Ansari's behaviour. I just think there has to be a better approach to supporting victims, whose voices are often lost in the hullabaloo, and improving the behaviour of men in general. That may require an acceptance of the idea that in some cases people can do bad things without necessarily having bad intentions. So far a lot of public apologies (or not-apologies) have focussed on intentions, not consequences. That is clearly something that needs to change, but I think airing all this out in public encourages people to be defensive in that way. This doesn't help the victim find closure and doesn't give the perpetrator any motive to genuinely hold themself accountable or analyse their own behaviour.

But my views are vague, conflicted and ultimately irrelevant. We should be listening to women, not shouting them down because we can't be bothered to process subtle concepts or read more than three sentences in a row.
It seems to me most skim read the actual story after reading opinion pieces that focused on her using "non verbal cues" to say he isn't a mind reader. That's not all she did. They just picked that phrase out of stuff like this:

But the main thing was that he wouldn’t let her move away from him. She compared the path they cut across his apartment to a football play. “It was 30 minutes of me getting up and moving and him following and sticking his fingers down my throat again. It was really repetitive. It felt like a fucking game.”

Throughout the course of her short time in the apartment, she says she used verbal and non-verbal cues to indicate how uncomfortable and distressed she was. “Most of my discomfort was expressed in me pulling away and mumbling. I know that my hand stopped moving at some points,” she said. “I stopped moving my lips and turned cold.”

And she froze, a classic thing to happen when being assaulted and something that is often used against victims after as they didn't fight back.
 
jeffrey-tambor.jpg


From Larry Sanders, Arrested Development, Transparent
 
I googled him and am still none the wiser. I'm also not sure who he harassed either.
The bit I found seem to suggest he has been accused of harassing trans and cis women, and that the trans women said she had forgiven him. It's not clear though. I think this mainly shows how out of touch I am to be honest.
 
"Transparent" Actress Calls Out Jeffrey Tambor For Getting A Free Pass Amid #MeToo

Billings rightfully points out that no other high-profile male accused of sexual harassment has yet found work since the #MeToo movement began, though some have sniffed around the idea of a comeback — except Tambor. That Tambor’s image is in the process of being rehabilitated and he still has a job is only explained by one factor: his victims were transgender women. “This man treated these transwomen the way most males treat us: like a fetish. Disposable. Amusing. Sexy. Replaceable,” she writes. It points to our larger problem of not taking trans people seriously, not acknowledging their pain and danger, not listening to their stories.
 
Weinstein charged with rape and other offenses in New York - this might be the most heartwarming sight I've seen all week.

View attachment 136342
Only charged with offences against two women.

Why not the other dozens he assaulted? This is not rhetorical, I wondered if there was an answer.
Surely he should be charged for the Rose McGowan rape.

He's pleaded not guilty. He obviously had a Mr Burns style team of shit hot lawyers and thinks he can beat the case cos he's incredibly rich a la OJ Simpson, Michael Jackson and R Kelly
 
I listened to a podcast today with James O'Brian interviewing Ronan Farrow. They didn't talk about the Woody Allen allegations but Ronan came over as a supremely intelligent and erudite man, albeit with that typical over-privileged white liberal vocal fry voice which the Americans seem to foster.

He's kind of at the forefront of journalism surrounding the #metoo movement. He exposed Harvey Weinstein.
He claims he treats each claim of sexual harassment or assault with a sceptical view until he has fully investigated the claims.

I think there has been a tendency towards the flat #ibelieveher standpoint on these claims. This is what got Margaret Atwood in trouble, for stating that each claim must be investigated rather than just automatically believe the accuser and hang the accused at point of accusation.

But Ronan did point out he does not just "believe her". An impressive individual, but he's obviously too close to the Woody Allen accusation to be objective.
 
Back
Top Bottom