beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
two tuesday boys are allowed in the OP's question
Yes, which is what gives you 13/27!
two tuesday boys are allowed in the OP's question
Irrelevant.In the OP, can the state of Child 1 affect the state of Child 2? What information, in the OP as stated, prevents the 2nd child from being a tuesday boy? If nothing prevents Child 2 from being a tuesday boy, then all possible children are possible. Half of all possible children are boys. The probability is 1/2. Add the "only" to the question in the OP, and you get the other answer.
two tuesday boys are allowed in the OP's question
Yes. And to answer the objection that everyone seems to be getting wrong, the order of Child1/child2 is fixed by the declaration of one of the children.
I have never seen this problem before. If you are right and this is generally considered to be the correct answer, I may have to set out why it isn't properly and send it to someone.Thing is, the correct answer is very well known, and it's not the one you're giving us. You might want to stop and wonder why that is rather than just repeating that you're right.
No. The order is irrelevant except in so far as it helps us enumerate all the possibilities. You've decided not to do it the easy way and hence have buggered up your counting.Yes. And to answer the objection that everyone seems to be getting wrong, the order of Child1/child2 is fixed by the declaration of one of the children. That is the order: declared; undeclared, as your knowledge stands at the point of working out the probability.
In the OP, can the state of Child 1 affect the state of Child 2? What information, in the OP as stated, prevents the 2nd child from being a tuesday boy? If nothing prevents Child 2 from being a tuesday boy, then all possible children are possible. Half of all possible children are boys. The probability is 1/2. Add the "only" to the question in the OP, and you get the other answer.
two tuesday boys are allowed in the OP's question
No. The order is irrelevant except in so far as it helps us enumerate all the possibilities. You've decided not to do it the easy way and hence have buggered up your counting.
Instead of repeating the wrong answer again, why not go and look it up? There's a perfectly good explanation linked to in the OP.
I have never seen this problem before. If you are right and this is generally considered to be the correct answer, I may have to set out why it isn't properly and send it to someone.
Seriously.
Aww, shucks.I love ymu
It's wrong.No. The order is irrelevant except in so far as it helps us enumerate all the possibilities. You've decided not to do it the easy way and hence have buggered up your counting.
Instead of repeating the wrong answer again, why not go and look it up? There's a perfectly good explanation linked to in the OP.
This isn't a question about two children. It's a question about one child.
No, it's a Bayesian probability question and the information you are given very much affects the answer.It's wrong.
Ok, one last go.
State of your knowledge at point of question:
there are two children
one is boy born on Tuesday (take this child out, whichever position he's in)
You are left with just one child at the point of consideration. This isn't a question about two children. It's a question about one child.
Please think about the absurdity of what you have just written here.If you then tell me that one child is a boy, I know it cannot be two girls. There are only two possibilities left, and one of them is twice as likely as the other one. The probability of a second boy is 1/3.
Put only in the OP, and then you get the interesting, counter-intuitive answer.
you're thinking about this the wrong way roundThink about it this way.
You have one child. It is a Tuesday Boy.
You get pregnant. Does the gender or birthday of your first child affect those of your second child? No.
You have one child. It is any gender/birthday you want.
You get pregnant. Is there any increased likelyhood of this child being a Tuesday Boy? No.
The variables are independent. This is not a drawing marbles from the bag question. Put only in the OP, and then you get the interesting, counter-intuitive answer.
Please think about the absurdity of what you have just written here.
Think about it this way.
You have one child. It is a Tuesday Boy.
You get pregnant. Does the gender or birthday of your first child affect those of your second child? No.
You have one child. It is any gender/birthday you want.
You get pregnant. Is there any increased likelyhood of this child being a Tuesday Boy? No.
The variables are independent. This is not a drawing marbles from the bag question. Put only in the OP, and then you get the interesting, counter-intuitive answer.
Please think about the absurdity of what you have just written here.
50/50The children are already born. We're not predicting the sex of the second child given that the first one was a boy (in which case, you would be correct), we're asking about the probability that both are boys given that one is a boy.
Oh yes it fucking is.