DJWrongspeed
radio eros
As if Ozzy bars are so great?
Golfrate have applied for planning permission to convert the top two floors of The Grosvenor into private flats.
http://www.brixtonbuzz.com/2014/07/...e-grosvenor-pub-stockwell-into-private-flats/
(*thanks to cuppa tee)
Same architect as the Brady's conversion................
[ thanks should really go to a dog walker in Slade Gardens who gave me the news btw ]
I'm pretty confident that it won't be a pub. At least not anything I'd describe as a pub.Seems the pub is being retained - in some form
It looks that way according to the plans, but the extension to the ground floor might be necessary to squeeze more flats on topSeems the pub is being retained - in some form
It looks that way according to the plans, but the extension to the ground floor might be necessary to squeeze more flats on top
one things for sure it won't be the same pub, and that is a loss to the area and beyond, I am trying to be optimistic but it's hard to imagine any future
premises will not be tainted by the whiff of pulled pork...........
Yep. It's really upsetting.I was told 1st weekend in August.
The much bigger problem is that golfrate want to turn the upstairs of the pub into flats.I thought the problem with The Grosvenor was the block opposite being built?
I'm sure the landlord John said he was selling cos he knew the new residents would moan about the noise. And are Golfrate actually buying? I got the impression it was still on offer
The new luxury flats opposite would have killed off the music just as surely.The much bigger problem is that golfrate want to turn the upstairs of the pub into flats.
And don’t forget the Canterbury Arms – mysteriously impossible to save from demolition and now suddenly right in the middle of the Council’s “Future Brixton” development.
Golfrate have already sent a surveyor in to measure the Grosvenor ground floor for “retail”.
If they get planning permission for the flats it’ll be a Tesco Metro in no time.
Refuse Permission
The following conditions for permission or reasons for refusal apply:
1 The evidence of marketing submitted to justify the loss of the public house (A4 use) at first and second floor levels is not considered to be sufficiently robust and comprehensive in line with the Councils Guidance Note for Marketing of Employment Premises and Sites. Consequently, insufficient justification for the loss of a use protected by adopted policy has been provided, undermining the Councils pool of employment generating sites and thus the proposal is contrary to policies 23 and 25 of the Unitary Development Plans (2007) and policy S3 of the LDF Core Strategy (2011)
2 In the absence of a Noise Impact Assessment of the existing noise climate affecting the development site, the local authority is unable to determine whether the amenity of future occupiers of the proposed dwellings would be affected as a result of the location of the surrounding late night noise generating uses. As such the proposed development would fail to comply with Policies 7 and 33 of the Unitary Development Plan: Policies saved beyond the 5th August 2010, Policy S2 of the Lambeth Local Development Framework Core Strategy (2011) and the Supplementary Planning Document ‘Guidance and Standards for Housing Developments and House Conversions’ (2008).